Doctrine
claims
The 1946 Indian Claims Commission let tribes press land and treaty claims against the United States for money, as in the Sioux case.
- Definition
- Claims against the United States or states for land loss or breach (ICC, Court of Claims, settlements).
What happened
The Indian Claims Commission Act of August 13, 1946 created a commission to "hear and determine" certain claims against the United States on behalf of any Indian tribe, band or identifiable group. The categories included claims arising under treaties and laws, claims that treaties or agreements should be revised for fraud, duress or unconscionable consideration, and "claims based upon fair and honorable dealings that are not recognized by any existing rule of law or equity."
The Act set a deadline. The Commission was to receive claims "for a period of five years after the date of the approval of this Act," and a claim not presented in that time could not later be heard by any court or agency.
The Sioux Nation case shows both promise and limits. In the Fort Laramie Treaty of 1868, the United States pledged that the Great Sioux Reservation, including the Black Hills, would be set apart for the Sioux's "absolute and undisturbed use and occupation." In 1980 the Supreme Court held that the 1877 Act effected "a taking of tribal property," which "implied an obligation on the Government's part to make just compensation to the Sioux." The Court noted a fair market value of $17.1 million as of 1877, plus interest.
In the Sioux case, the remedy the Court affirmed was compensation with interest.
Summarized with AI assistance from 4 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error
What the sources say, and how this was checked
Supported by the sources below; some details rest on one source.
claims based upon fair and honorable dealings that are not recognized by any existing rule of law or equity
Indian Claims Commission Act, 60 Stat. 1049 (Aug. 13, 1946), Statutes at LargeThe Commission shall receive claims for a period of five years after the date of the approval of this Act
Indian Claims Commission Act, 60 Stat. 1049 (Aug. 13, 1946), Statutes at Largeeffected a taking of tribal property which had been set aside by the Fort Laramie Treaty
United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians, 448 U.S. 371 (1980), Cornell LIIinterest on the principal sum of $17.1 million (the fair market value of the Black Hills as of 1877)
United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians, 448 U.S. 371 (1980), Cornell LII
Research notes. That the Commission paid money rather than returning land is inferred from the Act's 'quantum of relief' and payment provisions and from the Sioux outcome. The Act is shown here only through its first and later sections. The Sioux Nation's own response to the award was not examined. The case's path through the Court of Claims and the 1978 jurisdictional act is summarized only through the syllabus.
Who is doing the work
Native legal and land defense, nationally
- Native American Rights Fund (NARF) Native-led Litigation and legal advocacy for tribal sovereignty, treaty rights, land and resources Give on their site Website
- NDN Collective (LANDBACK Campaign) Native-led LANDBACK campaign (launched 2020; Mount Rushmore closure and return of Black Hills public lands), Indigenous… Give on their site Website
- Indian Land Tenure Foundation (ILTF) Native-led Land recovery and control by tribes and individual Indian landowners Website
- Decolonizing Wealth Project (Indigenous Earth Fund; California Tribal Land Return) Native-led Reparative philanthropy Give on their site Website
Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.
Connections
Applied in 21
- Choctaw Nation v. United States1886
- Pueblo Lands Act1924
- United States v. Creek Nation1935
- Shoshone Tribe v. United States1937
- Seminole Nation v. United States1942
- Northwestern Bands of Shoshone Indians v. United States1945
- Indian Claims Commission Act1946
- Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA)1971
- Rhode Island Indian Claims Settlement Act1978
- Maine Indian Claims Settlement Act (MICSA)1980
- United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians1980
- United States v. Dann1985
Show all 21
- Catawba Indian Tribe of South Carolina Land Claims Settlement Act1993
- United States v. Navajo Nation (Navajo I)2003
- Cobell v. Salazar (individual Indian trust litigation)2009
- Claims Resolution Act of 2010 (Cobell settlement; Land Buy-Back Program)2010
- United States v. Jicarilla Apache Nation2011
- Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin v. United States2016
- Arizona v. Navajo Nation2023
- Becerra v. San Carlos Apache Tribe2024
- Chinook Indian Nation v. Burgum2026
Sources
No source is linked to this record yet. That is a gap we are working to close.
- Kind
- Doctrine
- Confidence
- Medium