Court case
Northwestern Bands of Shoshone Indians v. United States
The 1863 Treaty of Box Elder did not recognize Shoshone title to the land, so the Court denied compensation for its taking.
- Citation
- 324 U.S. 335 (1945)
- Court
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Year
- 1945
- Nations
- Northwestern Bands of Shoshone
- Treaty at issue
- Treaty of Box Elder (1863)
- Effect on land rights
- eroded
What happened
The Northwestern Bands of Shoshone Indians sought to recover from the United States damages estimated at fifteen million dollars for the taking of some fifteen million acres of land they said they held by Indian title, which is title based on long occupancy rather than a grant. They said the United States had recognized that title in a treaty made with the bands at Box Elder, Utah Territory, on July 30, 1863.
They sued in the Court of Claims under a special jurisdictional act of Congress of February 28, 1929. The Act allowed claims "arising under or growing out of" the treaties it listed, including the treaty of July 30, 1863.
The Supreme Court, in an opinion by Justice Reed, affirmed the Court of Claims. It held that the 1863 treaty "was not a recognition or acknowledgment by the United States of the Indian title to the lands therein mentioned," so a claim for the taking of those lands was not one arising under the treaty. The Court said recognition of Indian title is not to be implied from the Indians' grant of permission for travel or mining, and that the treaty's use of the word "claim" or the phrase "country claimed" did not acknowledge title. Indian treaties, the Court said, are construed "according to their tenor," and their terms are not varied to avoid alleged injustices.
Four justices disagreed. Justice Roberts thought the judgment should be reversed. Justice Douglas dissented, joined by Justices Frankfurter and Murphy, and Justice Murphy dissented, joined by Justices Frankfurter and Douglas. Justice Jackson, joined by Justice Black, wrote separately about the difficulties of settling such a grievance through a lawsuit.
Good to know. The 'fifteen million' figures describe the Bands' claim, not a court finding.
Summarized with AI assistance from 4 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error
What the sources say, and how this was checked
Well supported by the sources below.
was not a recognition or acknowledgment by the United States of the Indian title to the lands therein mentioned
Northwestern Bands of Shoshone Indians v. United States, 324 U.S. 335 (1945) (U.S. Reports, Library of Congress)Indian treaties are to be construed according to their tenor
Northwestern Bands of Shoshone Indians v. United States, 324 U.S. 335 (1945) (U.S. Reports, Library of Congress)did not constitute acknowledgment by the United States of such title
Northwestern Bands of Shoshone Indians v. United States, 324 U.S. 335 (1945) (U.S. Reports, Library of Congress)MR. JUSTICE ROBERTS is of the view that the judgment should be reversed.
Northwestern Bands of Shoshone Indians v. United States, 324 U.S. 335 (1945) (U.S. Reports, Library of Congress)
Research notes. The opinion describes the claimed lands only by treaty text; I have not named where they lay. The old text's remarks about Tee-Hit-Ton (1955) and the Indian Claims Commission were removed as unsourced. The 'fifteen million' figures are the opinion's description of the Bands' claim, not a finding. The Jackson concurrence description is brief and from its opening lines.
Who is doing the work
This history belongs to living nations. Start with them:
- Eastern Shoshone Tribe of the Wind River Reservation, Wyoming
- Northwestern Band of the Shoshone Nation
- Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation
- Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians of Nevada (Four constituent bands: Battle Mountain Band; Elko Band; South Fork Band; and Wells Band)
Native legal and land defense, nationally
- Native American Rights Fund (NARF) Native-led Litigation and legal advocacy for tribal sovereignty, treaty rights, land and resources Give on their site Website
- NDN Collective (LANDBACK Campaign) Native-led LANDBACK campaign (launched 2020; Mount Rushmore closure and return of Black Hills public lands), Indigenous… Give on their site Website
- Indian Land Tenure Foundation (ILTF) Native-led Land recovery and control by tribes and individual Indian landowners Website
- Decolonizing Wealth Project (Indigenous Earth Fund; California Tribal Land Return) Native-led Reparative philanthropy Give on their site Website
Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.
Connections
Links marked “suggested” were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.
Doctrine applied 3
Concerns the instrument 1
- Treaty of Box Elder (Northwestern Shoshone), 18631863suggested
Policy era 1
- Indian New Deal and Reorganization1934suggested
Nations named 1
- Northwestern Shoshonesuggested
Decided a dispute over 1
Sources
- supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/324/335/legal text copy
The record’s fields
- Holding
- The 1863 treaty did not recognize Indian title to the lands claimed, so the claim did not arise under the treaty and was not recoverable under the 1929 jurisdictional act. Illustrates the recognized-title / aboriginal-title divide.
- Kind
- Court case
- Confidence
- High