How the land was taken
In 1784 nearly all of the land west of the Appalachians was Native land, and the new United States knew it: it needed treaties to claim it. Over the next 110 years the government recorded more than 700 cessions. Scroll to watch them happen, and to see what came after.
Map: C. C. Royce’s 1899 cession maps, colored by how each piece was taken. Chapters are AI-assisted summaries of the sources listed under each, not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations involved.
1784–1794
Treaties at the edge of a new nation
After the Revolution, the United States made its first treaties with Native nations and began to claim sole authority over buying their land.
The Treaty of Paris of 1783 ended the war with Britain but, the National Park Service says, set no terms for Britain's Native allies. The nations had to negotiate their own peace with the United States. At Fort Stanwix, New York, in 1784, the Park Service says the federal negotiators dictated terms to the Six Nations and took hostages until prisoners of war were returned. The Six Nations ceded interests in land west and north of an older boundary line. The treaty recognized each of the six nations as sovereign and promised to protect the Six Nations' reserve, a promise the Park Service says "was not kept."
New York did not wait for Washington. Within a year the state began making its own treaties with the Oneida, Tuscarora, Onondaga and Cayuga, starting at Fort Herkimer in June 1785, arguing that nations living inside its borders could deal with the state. At Fort Schuyler in 1788, the lands of the Oneida and Onondaga were, in the Park Service's words, greatly reduced, though hunting and fishing interests and the Onondaga right to make salt at Onondaga Lake were protected. In 1787 Congress promised in the Northwest Ordinance that "their lands and property shall never be taken from them without their consent," with an exception for "just and lawful wars authorized by Congress." In 1790 the Non-Intercourse Act barred the sale of Indian lands to individuals or states without formal federal approval.
The Park Service notes that the United States had negotiated its first treaty with a Native nation, the Delaware, in 1778. The National Archives counts approximately 370 treaties made and approved by the Senate from 1789 to 1871.
- 1784
The first postwar treaty, at Fort Stanwix
At Fort Stanwix, New York, the United States made its first treaty with the Six Nations after the Revolution. The National Park Service says the federal negotiators dictated the terms, took hostages until prisoners of war were returned, and that signers may have been coerced. The Six Nations ceded interests in land west and north of an older boundary line.
Treaty and Land Transaction of 1784, National Park Service, Treaty and Land Transaction of 1784, National Park Service, Treaty and Land Transaction of 1784, National Park Service
- 1787
- 1790
Sources for this chapter (6)
The federal negotiators then dictated the terms of the treaty to the Six Nations
Treaty and Land Transaction of 1784, National Park Servicea promise that was not kept.
Treaty and Land Transaction of 1784, National Park Serviceprohibited the sale of Indian lands to individuals or states, absent formal federal approval
State of New York Treaties and Land Transactions with the Oneida, Onondaga, and Cayuga, National Park Servicetheir lands and property shall never be taken from them without their consent
The Northwest Ordinance (1787), Teaching American HistoryFrom 1789 to 1871, approximately 370 treaties were made and approved by the Senate
American Indian Treaties, National ArchivesThe United States negotiated its first treaty with American Indians in 1778.
Treaty and Land Transaction of 1784, National Park Service
1795–1809
Cessions in the Ohio country
After the Battle of Fallen Timbers, treaties opened much of Ohio and Indiana, and Tecumseh challenged who had the right to sell.
General Anthony Wayne's victory at the Battle of Fallen Timbers on August 20, 1794, ended a series of hostilities on the Ohio Valley frontier. On August 3, 1795, Wayne signed the Treaty of Greenville with chiefs of the Wyandots, Delawares, Shawnees, Ottawas, Miamis and others. The West Virginia Encyclopedia says the nations ceded about two-thirds of present Ohio. They received $20,000 in goods at once and $9,500 in goods each year, and kept the right to hunt on the ceded land and to drive off or punish settlers who infringed on their lands. The same source says peace did not hold, because settlers almost immediately began to breach Indian territory to the west, and that leaders such as Tecumseh had not signed and did not recognize the treaty.
In 1809 William Henry Harrison, governor of the Indiana Territory, negotiated the Treaty of Fort Wayne with the Delawares, Shawnees, Potawatomis, Miamis, Kickapoos and others to acquire 3 million acres, the National Library of Medicine's Native Voices timeline records. The Shawnee leader Tecumseh told Harrison the signers had no authority to sell the land. He questioned whether they could rightfully sell land held in common with other Native peoples. As Congress ratified the treaty, he warned Americans not to settle on the land and organized troops to fight any incursions.
- 1795
Greenville opens most of Ohio
After the victory at Fallen Timbers, General Anthony Wayne and chiefs of the Wyandots, Delawares, Shawnees, Ottawas, Miamis and others signed the Treaty of Greenville on August 3, 1795. The West Virginia Encyclopedia says the nations ceded about two-thirds of present Ohio. It adds that Tecumseh had not signed and did not recognize the treaty.
Treaty of Greenville, e-WV: The West Virginia Encyclopedia, Treaty of Greenville, e-WV: The West Virginia Encyclopedia, Treaty of Greenville, e-WV: The West Virginia Encyclopedia
- 1809
Fort Wayne, and Tecumseh's objection
In the Treaty of Fort Wayne, Governor William Henry Harrison acquired 3 million acres from the Delawares, Shawnees, Potawatomis, Miamis, Kickapoos and others. The National Library of Medicine's timeline says Tecumseh told Harrison the signers had no authority to sell the land, asked whether land held in common could be sold, and warned Americans not to settle on it.
1809: Treaty of Fort Wayne, Native Voices, National Library of Medicine, 1809: Treaty of Fort Wayne, Native Voices, National Library of Medicine, 1809: Treaty of Fort Wayne, Native Voices, National Library of Medicine
Sources for this chapter (5)
Under the terms of the treaty, the Indians ceded to the United States about two-thirds of present Ohio.
Treaty of Greenville, e-WV: The West Virginia Encyclopediathe authority to drive off or punish settlers of European descent who infringed on their lands
Treaty of Greenville, e-WV: The West Virginia Encyclopediasome tribal leaders, such as Tecumseh, had not signed the treaty and did not recognize its provisions
Treaty of Greenville, e-WV: The West Virginia Encyclopediato acquire 3 million acres
1809: Treaty of Fort Wayne, Native Voices, National Library of MedicineTecumseh tells Harrison, a future U.S. president, that the signers have no authority to sell the land.
1809: Treaty of Fort Wayne, Native Voices, National Library of Medicine
1810–1829
A doctrine and a policy take shape
The Supreme Court wrote a rule about extinguishing Native title into law while Georgia pressed the Cherokee to leave.
In Johnson v. M'Intosh (1823), Chief Justice Marshall wrote that discovery gave the discovering government "an exclusive right to extinguish the Indian title of occupancy, either by purchase or by conquest." The same opinion called Native people "the rightful occupants of the soil, with a legal as well as just claim to retain possession of it." In March 1824, Secretary of War John C. Calhoun set up the Bureau of Indian Affairs inside the War Department by his own order, Interior's Bureau of Indian Affairs says. Congress created it by statute in 1832.
The Cherokee Nation shows how pressure built. The National Park Service says treaties beginning in 1791 recognized the Cherokee Nation as sovereign, yet treaties and agreements "steadily whittled away at their land base." As more cessions were forced in the first two decades of the 1800s, some Cherokee moved to what is now northwest Arkansas. In 1819 the Cherokee National Council told the federal government it would no longer cede land. Georgia's residents resented Cherokee success in holding onto their homelands and governing themselves. In 1828 Georgia passed a law declaring Cherokee laws null and void after June 1, 1830. When gold was found on Cherokee land in 1829, efforts to dislodge the Cherokee intensified, and President Andrew Jackson began to implement a policy of extinguishing Indian land titles in affected states and relocating the Indian population.
- 1819
- 1823
- 1824
Sources for this chapter (5)
discovery gave an exclusive right to extinguish the Indian title of occupancy, either by purchase or by conquest
Johnson v. M'Intosh, 21 U.S. 543 (1823), Cornell LIIthe rightful occupants of the soil, with a legal as well as just claim to retain possession of it
Johnson v. M'Intosh, 21 U.S. 543 (1823), Cornell LIISecretary of War John C. Calhoun administratively established the BIA within the his department on March 11, 1824.
What is the BIA's history?, Bureau of Indian AffairsIn 1819, the Cherokee National Council notified the federal government that it would no longer cede land
Cherokee Relations with US Government Before Removal, National Park ServiceWhen gold was discovered on Cherokee land in northern Georgia in 1829, efforts to dislodge the Cherokee from their lands intensified.
Cherokee Relations with US Government Before Removal, National Park Service
1830–1838
Removal
Congress authorized exchanging Native lands in the East for land west of the Mississippi, and whole nations were moved.
The Indian Removal Act of May 28, 1830, let the President divide land west of the Mississippi into districts "for the reception of such tribes or nations of Indians as may choose to exchange the lands where they now reside." The National Park Service says it targeted the Cherokee, Choctaw, Creek, Chickasaw and Seminole nations of the Southeast in particular, and that the treaties negotiated under it aimed at clearing Indian-occupied land for white settlers.
The Choctaw signed first. In January 1830 the Mississippi legislature voted to extend state jurisdiction over Choctaw lands. EBSCO says leaders, feeling pressured, agreed to negotiate, and at Dancing Rabbit Creek they gave up the remaining ten million acres of their land in Mississippi. About 15 percent of the tribe died during removal, EBSCO says.
The Cherokee went to court and to Congress. In Worcester v. Georgia (1832) the Supreme Court held that Georgia's laws "can have no force" in Cherokee territory, but Georgia ignored the ruling and President Jackson refused to act. In December 1835 a small group of Cherokee, the Ridge Party, signed the Treaty of New Echota. Principal Chief John Ross gathered a petition of over 15,000 signatures against it and wrote Congress that "we are not parties to its covenants." The Senate approved the treaty by one vote. In 1838 General Winfield Scott's soldiers rounded up Cherokee families into internment camps and stockades. Of about 15,000 who began the trek west, an estimated 4,000 died.
- 1830
- 1830
- 1831
- 1832
Worcester v. Georgia
The Supreme Court held that the Cherokee nation was a distinct community occupying its own territory, where the laws of Georgia could have no force. The National Park Service says Georgia ignored the ruling and that President Jackson, who sided with Georgia, refused to act. Treaty-making toward Cherokee removal continued.
Worcester v. Georgia, 31 U.S. 515 (1832), Cornell LII, Worcester v. Georgia, 31 U.S. 515 (1832), Cornell LII, Cherokee Relations with US Government Before Removal, National Park Service
- 1832
- 1835
New Echota, and the Cherokee protest treaty
On December 29, 1835, a small group of Cherokee signed the Treaty of New Echota, ceding all Cherokee lands east of the Mississippi for five million dollars. Chief John Ross wrote Congress that the treaty "is not the act of our Nation." The Senate ratified it despite knowing no official representative of the Cherokee Nation had signed.
Treaty with the Cherokee, 1835, Tribal Treaties Database, Oklahoma State University, Chief John Ross Protests the Treaty of New Echota, National Park Service, Cherokee Relations with US Government Before Removal, National Park Service
- 1838
Sources for this chapter (11)
for the reception of such tribes or nations of Indians as may choose to exchange the lands where they now reside
Indian Removal Act (1830), Teaching American Historythe Federal Government negotiated treaties aimed at clearing Indian-occupied land for white settlers
Trail of Tears, National Park Servicethe Mississippi legislature voted to extend state jurisdiction over Choctaw lands
Treaty of Dancing Rabbit Creek, EBSCO Research Startersabout 15 percent of the tribe died during removal
Treaty of Dancing Rabbit Creek, EBSCO Research StartersGeorgia simply ignored the ruling
Cherokee Relations with US Government Before Removal, National Park Servicein which the laws of Georgia can have no force
Worcester v. Georgia, 31 U.S. 515 (1832), Cornell LIIall the lands owned claimed or possessed by them east of the Mississippi river
Treaty with the Cherokee, 1835, Tribal Treaties Database, Oklahoma State UniversityRoss gathered a petition of over 15,000 signatures asking Congress to void the treaty.
Cherokee Relations with US Government Before Removal, National Park ServiceThe Senate, however, approved the treaty by a margin of one vote in 1836.
Cherokee People in North Carolina, Part V: The Trail of Tears, NCpediawe are not parties to its covenants
Chief John Ross Protests the Treaty of New Echota, National Park ServiceOf the approximately 15,000 who began the trek, an estimated 4,000 perished.
Cherokee People in North Carolina, Part V: The Trail of Tears, NCpedia
1839–1850
After removal, the frontier moves west
The removed nations rebuilt in Indian Territory, the Seminole war ground on, and some Cherokee stayed behind.
The Cherokee who survived the march found themselves in Indian Territory, in what is now Oklahoma, after about five months on the road, the National Park Service says. The Choctaw had agreed in 1820, in the Treaty of Doak's Stand, to sell five million acres in Mississippi for thirteen million acres west of the river. EBSCO says the removal of most of the tribe began in 1831 and lasted three years.
Not every Cherokee left. NCpedia says 300 to 400 Cherokees remained in North Carolina, hiding in the mountains. Between 1838 and the end of the Civil War, many Cherokees gave their money to their agent, William Holland Thomas, to buy land for them. He acquired many of the tracts that make up the Qualla Boundary, and these Cherokees, together with those who hid or returned, formed the nucleus of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians.
In Florida, the Seminole Nation Museum says most Seminoles refused to leave and the Second Seminole War lasted until 1842. It calls it the longest and most costly of the wars of removal, and says the Seminoles "as a nation never stopped resisting." The war claimed over 1,500 U.S. soldiers. At its end, with no peace treaty, roughly 3,000 Seminoles had been removed to Indian Territory and fewer than 500 remained in the Everglades. In 1849 the Bureau of Indian Affairs moved from the War Department to the new Interior Department.
Sources for this chapter (5)
Those who were still alive five months later found themselves in Indian Territory.
Trail of Tears, National Park ServiceFive million acres of land in western and west-central Mississippi were sold to the United States
Treaty of Dancing Rabbit Creek, EBSCO Research StartersApproximately 300 to 400 Cherokees remained in North Carolina, hiding in the mountains.
Cherokee People in North Carolina, Part V: The Trail of Tears, NCpediathe Seminoles as a nation never stopped resisting.
The Seminole Wars, Seminole Nation MuseumIn 1849, the BIA was transferred to the newly created Interior Department.
What is the BIA's history?, Bureau of Indian Affairs
1851–1867
Reservations and war on the Plains
As emigrant roads crossed the Plains, treaties fixed territories and then reservations, and violence followed.
On September 17, 1851, the Treaty of Fort Laramie was concluded with the Sioux, Cheyenne, Arapaho, Crow, Assiniboine, Gros Ventre, Mandan and Arikara. The nations recognized the right of the United States "to establish roads, military and other posts, within their respective territories." The treaty named each nation's territory and said the nations did "not hereby abandon or prejudice any rights or claims they may have to other lands." The United States promised to protect the nations from depredations by its people and to pay $50,000 a year for ten years.
In the Pacific Northwest, Washington Territorial Governor Isaac Stevens compelled tribes to enter treaties, the Washington Secretary of State's history says. At Medicine Creek on December 26, 1854, the Puyallup, Nisqually, Steilacoom and Squaxin Island tribes ceded most of their lands for $32,500, reservations, and the permanent right of access to traditional fishing and hunting grounds. HistoryLink says the overwhelming evidence is that not all 62 leaders named on the treaty actually signed, largely because they objected to the inadequate Puyallup and Nisqually reservations. Larger reservations followed in 1857.
War reached other nations. In August 1862, with the Dakota facing starvation, fighting broke out in Minnesota. The fighting lasted six weeks. On December 26, 38 Dakota were hanged at Mankato, and the Dakota were forcibly removed from the state. On November 29, 1864, soldiers killed more than 230 Cheyenne and Arapaho at Sand Creek, the National Park Service says.
- 1851
First Fort Laramie treaty
At Fort Laramie in September 1851, the Sioux, Cheyenne, Arapaho, Crow and other nations recognized the right of the United States to establish roads and military posts within their territories. The treaty named each nation's territory and said they did not abandon rights or claims to other lands. The United States promised to protect them from depredations by its people.
Treaty of Fort Laramie with Sioux, etc., 1851, Tribal Treaties Database, Treaty of Fort Laramie with Sioux, etc., 1851, Tribal Treaties Database, Treaty of Fort Laramie with Sioux, etc., 1851, Tribal Treaties Database
- 1854
Medicine Creek treaty in Puget Sound
At Medicine Creek on December 26, 1854, Governor Isaac Stevens and the Puyallup, Nisqually, Steilacoom and Squaxin Island tribes made the treaty. HistoryLink says the tribes ceded most of their lands for $32,500, reservations and the permanent right of access to traditional fishing and hunting grounds, and that not all 62 leaders named actually signed.
Treaty of Medicine Creek, 1854, HistoryLink.org, Treaty of Medicine Creek, 1854, HistoryLink.org, The Boldt Decision at 50, Washington Secretary of State
- 1862
U.S.-Dakota War and the removal after it
In August 1862, with the Dakota facing starvation, fighting broke out in Minnesota. On December 26, 38 Dakota were hanged at Mankato, the largest mass execution in U.S. history, the Minnesota Historical Society says. About 1,600 non-combatant Dakota were held at Fort Snelling that winter and then forcibly removed from the state to reservations in Dakota Territory and what is now Nebraska.
U.S.-Dakota War of 1862: Background, Minnesota Historical Society, U.S.-Dakota War of 1862: Background, Minnesota Historical Society, U.S.-Dakota War of 1862: Background, Minnesota Historical Society
- 1864
Sources for this chapter (6)
recognize the right of the United States Government to establish roads, military and other posts, within their respective territories
Treaty of Fort Laramie with Sioux, etc., 1851, Tribal Treaties Databasedo not hereby abandon or prejudice any rights or claims they may have to other lands
Treaty of Fort Laramie with Sioux, etc., 1851, Tribal Treaties DatabaseWashington Territorial Governor Isaac Stevens compelled them to enter treaties
The Boldt Decision at 50, Washington Secretary of Statethe overwhelming historical evidence indicates that not all those named actually signed
Treaty of Medicine Creek, 1854, HistoryLink.orgOn Dec. 26, 1862, 38 Dakota were hanged in Mankato in the largest mass execution in U.S. history.
U.S.-Dakota War of 1862: Background, Minnesota Historical Societykilled more than 230 Cheyenne and Arapaho over the course of seven hours
Sand Creek Massacre National Historic Site, National Park Service
1868–1870
The treaties of 1868
After war, the United States promised to close the Bozeman Trail and recognized the Great Sioux Reservation, and signed the treaty that let the Navajo go home.
Red Cloud, an Oglala Lakota, declared he would keep making war on travelers and Army posts until the government closed the Bozeman Trail, which ran through Sioux treaty lands toward the Montana gold fields, North Dakota Studies says. In 1868 a treaty commission met again at Fort Laramie. The United States promised to close the Bozeman Trail and the forts along it. The treaty set apart a reservation for the "absolute and undisturbed use and occupation" of the Indians named. Article 12 said no cession of reservation land would be valid unless signed by at least three-fourths of the adult male Indians occupying or interested in it. Article 16 declared the country north of the North Platte River and east of the Big Horn Mountains "unceded Indian territory." Many Lakota bands agreed to the treaty, but many did not sign; North Dakota Studies notes that Sitting Bull and his Hunkpapa band were among those who did not.
In late May 1868 at Fort Sumner, New Mexico, General William T. Sherman offered the Navajo a choice between Oklahoma and returning to their ancestral lands, the National Archives says. The Navajo chose to go home. Their leader Barboncito spoke for them, and the treaty was signed on June 1, 1868. A House report says approximately 8,000 Navajos were forced to make a 350-mile march to the Bosque Redondo, a site that became a virtual prison camp where more than 3,000 Navajo people died. The treaty recognized the Navajo Nation as it exists today.
- 1868
- 1868
Second Fort Laramie treaty
After war over the Bozeman Trail, the United States promised to close the trail and the forts along it. The treaty set apart a reservation for the "absolute and undisturbed use and occupation" of the Indians named, and Article 12 required the signatures of three-fourths of adult male Indians for any cession of it. The treaty was ratified February 16, 1869.
The Treaties of Fort Laramie, 1851 & 1868, North Dakota Studies, Treaty with the Sioux, Brule, Oglala, etc., and Arapaho, 1868, Tribal Treaties Database, Treaty with the Sioux, Brule, Oglala, etc., and Arapaho, 1868, Tribal Treaties Database
Sources for this chapter (6)
The government promised to close the Bozeman trail and the forts along the trail.
The Treaties of Fort Laramie, 1851 & 1868, North Dakota Studiesset apart for the absolute and undisturbed use and occupation of the Indians herein named
Treaty with the Sioux, Brule, Oglala, etc., and Arapaho, 1868, Tribal Treaties Databaseunless executed and signed by at least three-fourths of all the adult male Indians, occupying or interested in the same
Treaty with the Sioux, Brule, Oglala, etc., and Arapaho, 1868, Tribal Treaties DatabaseSherman offered a choice between moving to Oklahoma
The Navajo Treaty Travels to the Navajo Nation, National Archives Pieces of HistoryMore than 3,000 Navajo people died due to starvation, malnutrition, exposure to freezing temperatures, disease, or by gunfire
House Report 107-222, Long Walk National Historic Trail Study Act, govinfo.govThe United States and the Navajo tribes executed the Treaty of 1868 recognizing the Navajo Nation as it exists today.
House Report 107-222, Long Walk National Historic Trail Study Act, govinfo.gov
1871–1886
After the end of treaty-making
Congress stopped making treaties with Native nations in 1871, and the Black Hills were taken by statute.
The Indian Appropriation Act of March 3, 1871, ended formal treaty-making with Native nations: no Indian nation or tribe within the territory of the United States would be acknowledged or recognized as an independent nation, tribe, or power with whom the United States may contract by treaty. Treaties already made were not undone. After 1871, the National Archives says, agreements were made through Acts of Congress, Executive Orders and Executive Agreements.
The Black Hills show how that worked. The 1868 treaty had pledged them to the Sioux. Amid speculation about gold, the Supreme Court later wrote, the Army made an exploratory expedition into the Hills in 1874, and in November 1875 President Grant decided the military should make no further resistance to miners. A commission then presented an "agreement" to the Sioux in 1876, ignoring the treaty's three-fourths rule. It was signed by only 10 percent of adult male Sioux. Congress made it law on February 28, 1877, which the Court said had the effect of abrogating the Fort Laramie Treaty.
The Sioux nations never accepted that. In 1980 the Supreme Court held that the 1877 Act took tribal property and that just compensation, with interest, was owed. PBS reported in 2011 that the money, then well over a billion dollars, had never been collected; Oglala Sioux Tribe counsel Mario Gonzalez said the tribes have maintained since 1877 that the taking was illegal and want some land returned.
- 1871
- 1877
Sources for this chapter (7)
No Indian nation or tribe within the territory of the United States shall be acknowledged
25 U.S. Code 71, Cornell LIIThe Act ended formal treaty making with American Indian nations and the Senate's role in ratifying those treaties.
American Indian Treaties, National ArchivesAfter 1871, treaties were made through Acts of Congress, Executive Orders, and Executive Agreements.
American Indian Treaties, National ArchivesIt was signed by only 10% of the adult male Sioux population.
United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians, 448 U.S. 371 (1980), Cornell LIIThe Act had the effect of abrogating the earlier Fort Laramie Treaty
United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians, 448 U.S. 371 (1980), Cornell LIIThe trust's value continues to grow well beyond $1 billion, but the Sioux have never collected.
Why the Sioux Are Refusing $1.3 Billion, PBS NewsHour (2011)they've maintained that position since 1877
Why the Sioux Are Refusing $1.3 Billion, PBS NewsHour (2011)
1887–1933
Allotment and assimilation
Congress divided reservations into individual plots and opened the rest to settlers; tribal land fell by about two-thirds.
The Dawes Act, signed on February 8, 1887, authorized the President to break up reservation land held in common into small allotments for individual Native Americans, the National Archives says. A head of family could receive a quarter of a section. The United States would hold each allotment in trust for twenty-five years. Once allotments were made, the Secretary of the Interior could negotiate to buy the rest of a reservation. The law said that land so sold would be "disposed of by the United States to actual and bona fide settlers only." Interior's Bureau of Indian Affairs says Native Americans controlled about 138 million acres of land before the Dawes Act, and 48 million acres remained in tribal control by 1934.
The 1889 Sioux Act divided the Great Sioux Reservation into six reservations and opened about 9 million acres to non-Native settlement, according to the North Dakota State Museum. On December 29, 1890, the U.S. Army's 7th Cavalry massacred Lakota people at Wounded Knee; History.com estimates almost 150 were killed, nearly half of them women and children, and says some historians put the number at twice as high. The Kiowa, Comanche and Apache sued over a 1900 land law passed without the three-fourths signatures their treaty required, but in Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock the Court held that Congress could pass laws in conflict with Indian treaties, the 1980 Sioux Nation opinion recounts.
Congress made all non-citizen Indians born in the United States citizens in 1924. The 1928 Meriam Report condemned the allotment policy and urged protection for Indian property.
- 1887
- 1889
- 1890
Wounded Knee
On December 29, 1890, the U.S. Army's 7th cavalry surrounded a band of Ghost Dancers under the Lakota chief Big Foot near Wounded Knee Creek on the Pine Ridge reservation. History.com says it is estimated almost 150 Native Americans were killed, nearly half of them women and children, and that some historians put the number at twice as high.
Massacre at Wounded Knee, History.com, Massacre at Wounded Knee, History.com
- 1903
- 1924
- 1928
Sources for this chapter (6)
disposed of by the United States to actual and bona fide settlers only
Dawes Act (1887), National Archives Milestone DocumentsIndian held land went from 138 million acres in 1887 to 48 million acres in 1934.
Federal Law and Indian Policy Overview, Bureau of Indian Affairsopened about 9 million acres of former reservation land for non-Native settlement
The Sioux Act of 1889 and Its Modern Implications, North Dakota Heritage Center & State Museumalmost 150 Native Americans were killed
Massacre at Wounded Knee, History.comthe legislative power might pass laws in conflict with treaties made with the Indians.
United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians, 448 U.S. 371 (1980), Cornell LIIThe report condemned the allotment policy that had been instituted with the passage of the General Allotment Act of 1887,
Meriam Report, EBSCO Research Starters
1934–1968
Reorganization and termination
Congress ended allotment in 1934, but the 1950s brought a policy of ending federal recognition of tribes.
The Indian Reorganization Act of June 18, 1934, provided that no land of any Indian reservation "shall be allotted in severalty to any Indian." It extended trust periods on Indian lands and let the Secretary of the Interior acquire land "for the purpose of providing lands for Indians." DocsTeach says it gave tribes the choice to vote on whether to organize under the Act. In 1946 Congress created the Indian Claims Commission to hear tribal claims. The National Archives says it was not empowered to grant or restore land, but it could award money based on the market value of lands when they were lost. It ultimately awarded over $800 million.
On August 1, 1953, House Concurrent Resolution 108 called for termination, "at the earliest possible time," of tribes in California, Florida, New York and Texas and of named tribes including the Flathead, Klamath and Menominee. Termination ended federal recognition and trust status for affected reservations. Public Law 280, enacted August 15, 1953, gave state authorities criminal and civil jurisdiction over most reservations in California, Minnesota, Nebraska, Oregon and Wisconsin. From 1953 until 1970, Congress initiated 60 separate termination proceedings, and over three million acres of tribal lands were relinquished.
Dams took land too. The Army Corps of Engineers began work on Oahe Dam on Cheyenne River Sioux land in 1948. By its dedication in 1962, a Senate report says, 104,492 acres of tribal land were inundated and 181 families, 30 percent of the tribal population, were forced to relocate.
- 1934
- 1946
- 1953
Termination policy begins
House Concurrent Resolution 108, announced August 1, 1953, called for termination at the earliest possible time of tribes in California, Florida, New York and Texas and of named tribes such as the Flathead, Klamath and Menominee. The National Archives counts 60 termination proceedings from 1953 to 1970, with over three million acres of tribal lands relinquished.
Bureau of Indian Affairs Records: Termination, National Archives, Bureau of Indian Affairs Records: Termination, National Archives
Sources for this chapter (5)
shall be allotted in severalty to any Indian
Indian Reorganization Act (1934), textThe legislation gave tribes the choice to vote whether or not they wished to politically organize under the Wheeler-Howard Act.
Indian Reorganization Act, DocsTeach, National ArchivesThe ICC was not empowered to grant or restore land to tribes
Record Group 279: Records of the Indian Claims Commission, National ArchivesFrom 1953 until 1970, Congress initiated 60 separate termination proceedings against American Indian tribes
Bureau of Indian Affairs Records: Termination, National Archives104,492 acres of tribal lands had been inundated
Senate Report 106-217, Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe Equitable Compensation Act, govinfo.gov
1969–1999
Self-determination and the first returns
Protest, new federal policy and court victories brought the first returns of land and recognition of treaty rights.
From November 1969 to June 1971, Indians of All Tribes occupied Alcatraz Island, protesting federal policies that took aboriginal land. The National Park Service calls it the first intertribal protest action to focus the nation's attention on the situation of Native peoples. On July 8, 1970, President Nixon told Congress that "this policy of forced termination is wrong." That December, Congress returned 48,000 acres taken in 1906 to Taos Pueblo, which Taos Pueblo's own page calls the Return of Blue Lake. In 1971 the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act gave Alaska Natives approximately 45 million acres and about $962.5 million, while extinguishing their claims to over 360 million acres, the Congressional Research Service reports. In 1972 an executive order restored a 21,000-acre tract of Mount Adams to the Yakima Reservation.
In December 1973 President Nixon signed the Menominee Restoration Act, returning the Menominee Indian Tribe to federal trust status. On February 12, 1974, Judge George Boldt ruled that Washington State had disregarded promises made to the tribes in the 1850s and that tribes were entitled to up to 50 percent of the catch. In 1980 the Supreme Court held that the Black Hills had been taken and compensation was owed. In 1985 it held that the Oneida had a federal right of action over a 1795 land sale made without federal approval. In 1990 the Puyallup Land Claims Settlement gave the Tribe roughly 900 acres.
- 1969
Alcatraz is occupied
From November 1969 to June 1971, a group called Indians of All Tribes, Inc. occupied Alcatraz Island, protesting government policies that took aboriginal land away from American Indians. The National Park Service calls it the first intertribal protest action to focus the nation's attention on the situation of Native peoples in the United States.
Alcatraz Occupation, National Park Service, Alcatraz Occupation, National Park Service
- 1970
- 1970
- 1971
- 1972
- 1973
- 1974
- 1980
Sioux Nation ruling on the Black Hills
On June 30, 1980, the Supreme Court held that the 1877 Act took tribal property, which implied an obligation to make just compensation to the Sioux Nation. PBS reported in 2011 that the Sioux had never collected the money, then over $1 billion, and former special trustee Ross Swimmer said "They didn't want the money. They wanted the Black Hills."
United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians, 448 U.S. 371 (1980), Cornell LII, United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians, 448 U.S. 371 (1980), Cornell LII, Why the Sioux Are Refusing $1.3 Billion, PBS NewsHour (2011)
- 1985
Oneida win on a 1795 land sale
On March 4, 1985, the Supreme Court held that the Oneida had a federal common-law right of action for violation of their possessory rights. The Oneida said their ancestors' 1795 conveyance to New York State violated the 1793 Nonintercourse Act, which barred purchases of Indian land without federal approval.
County of Oneida v. Oneida Indian Nation, 470 U.S. 226 (1985), Cornell LII, County of Oneida v. Oneida Indian Nation, 470 U.S. 226 (1985), Cornell LII, County of Oneida v. Oneida Indian Nation, 470 U.S. 226 (1985), Cornell LII
- 1990
Sources for this chapter (7)
It was the first intertribal protest action to focus the nation's attention on the situation of native peoples in the United States.
Alcatraz Occupation, National Park ServiceThis policy of forced termination is wrong, in my judgment, for a number of reasons.
Special Message on Indian Affairs (July 8, 1970), Teaching American Historyin 1906 an injustice was done in which land involved in this bill, 48,000 acres, was taken from the Indians involved
The Return of Blue Lake, Taos PuebloAlaska Natives received approximately 45 million acres
Alaska Native Lands and the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act, Congressional Research Serviceto administer it for the use and benefit of the Yakima Tribe of Indians
Executive Order 11670 (May 20, 1972), American Presidency ProjectBy restoring the Menominee Indian Tribe to Federal trust status
Statement on Signing the Menominee Restoration Act (Dec. 22, 1973), American Presidency ProjectFederal Judge George H. Boldt ruled that the State of Washington had disregarded solemn promises made to the tribes in the 1850s.
The Boldt Decision at 50, Washington Secretary of State
2000–today
Apology, repair, and land coming back
Agencies apologized, courts held the United States to old treaties, and some land returned to tribal ownership.
On September 8, 2000, Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs Kevin Gover said at the Bureau of Indian Affairs' 175th anniversary: "On behalf of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, I extend this formal apology to Indian people for the historical conduct of this agency." In 2005, the Supreme Court held in City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation that the Oneida could not revive tribal sovereignty over parcels they had bought on the open market, a reminder that regaining land does not always restore full authority over it.
On July 9, 2020, in McGirt v. Oklahoma, the Supreme Court held that land the Creek treaties promised remains a reservation for purposes of federal criminal law: "Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word." In 2021 Interior moved the National Bison Range, approximately 18,800 acres, into trust for the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes, saying the 1908 act that created it had reduced their homeland. Congress approved the transfer in a 2021 law. The Land Buy-Back Program concluded in 2023 with nearly 3 million acres in 15 states consolidated into tribal trust ownership.
On October 25, 2024, President Biden said: "I formally apologize, as President of the United States of America, for what we did," speaking of Indian boarding schools. On December 18, 2025, the Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina was recognized when the National Defense Authorization Act was signed, the tribe says.
- 2000
Apology from the Bureau of Indian Affairs
On September 8, 2000, at the Bureau of Indian Affairs' 175th anniversary, Assistant Secretary Kevin Gover said: "On behalf of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, I extend this formal apology to Indian people for the historical conduct of this agency." It was an apology by the agency, not by Congress.
Gover Apologizes For BIA's Misdeeds, Bureau of Indian Affairs press release (Sept. 8, 2000), Gover Apologizes For BIA's Misdeeds, Bureau of Indian Affairs press release (Sept. 8, 2000)
- 2005
Sherrill limits Oneida sovereignty over bought land
In City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation, decided March 29, 2005, the Supreme Court held that the Tribe could not unilaterally revive its ancient sovereignty over parcels it had bought. It cited the non-Indian character of central New York, 200 years of state authority, and the Oneidas' long delay in seeking relief.
City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of N.Y., 544 U.S. 197 (2005), Cornell LII, City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of N.Y., 544 U.S. 197 (2005), Cornell LII
- 2020
McGirt v. Oklahoma
On July 9, 2020, the Supreme Court asked whether the land promised by treaties to the Creek Nation remains a reservation. It held that it does for purposes of the Major Crimes Act: "Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word."
McGirt v. Oklahoma, 591 U.S. ___ (2020), supremecourt.gov, McGirt v. Oklahoma, 591 U.S. ___ (2020), supremecourt.gov, McGirt v. Oklahoma, 591 U.S. ___ (2020), supremecourt.gov
- 2021
National Bison Range returned
On June 23, 2021, Interior announced it was moving all National Bison Range lands, approximately 18,800 acres, into trust for the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes. Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary Bryan Newland said the act that created the Range reduced the Salish and Kootenai peoples' homeland by thousands of acres. A 2021 law approved the transfer.
Interior Transfers National Bison Range Lands in Trust for the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes, U.S. Department of the Interior, Interior Transfers National Bison Range Lands in Trust for the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes, U.S. Department of the Interior, Interior Transfers National Bison Range Lands in Trust for the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes, U.S. Department of the Interior
- 2023
- 2024
Presidential apology for boarding schools
On October 25, 2024, at the Gila River Indian Community in Arizona, President Biden said the federal government had never formally apologized for the Indian boarding school program until that day: "I formally apologize, as President of the United States of America, for what we did." The text is from the official Public Papers of the President.
Remarks at the Gila River Indian Community (Oct. 25, 2024), govinfo.gov, Remarks at the Gila River Indian Community (Oct. 25, 2024), govinfo.gov
- 2025
Sources for this chapter (7)
On behalf of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, I extend this formal apology to Indian people for the historical conduct of this agency.
Gover Apologizes For BIA's Misdeeds, Bureau of Indian Affairs press release (Sept. 8, 2000)the Tribe cannot unilaterally revive its ancient sovereignty, in whole or in part, over the parcels at issue
City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of N.Y., 544 U.S. 197 (2005), Cornell LIIwe hold the government to its word.
McGirt v. Oklahoma, 591 U.S. ___ (2020), supremecourt.govthis act reduced the Salish and Kootenai peoples’ homeland by thousands of acres
Interior Transfers National Bison Range Lands in Trust for the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes, U.S. Department of the Interiornearly 3 million acres in 15 states were consolidated and restored to Tribal trust ownership
Three Million Acres of Land Returned to Tribes Through Interior's Land Buy-Back Program, U.S. Department of the InteriorI formally apologize, as President of the United States of America, for what we did.
Remarks at the Gila River Indian Community (Oct. 25, 2024), govinfo.govthe Lumbee Tribe of N.C. is fully Federally Recognized as the 575th Tribe in the nation
Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina fully and rightfully recognized, Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina