Court case
United States v. Dann
In 1985 the Court held that depositing a $26 million claims award in a Treasury account for the Shoshone Tribe counted as "payment."
- Citation
- 470 U.S. 39 (1985)
- Court
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Year
- 1985
- Nations
- Western Shoshone (Newe Sogobia)
- Treaty at issue
- none discussed in opinion (Indian Claims Commission Act proceedings); Treaty of Ruby Valley (1863) is background [needs source]
- Effect on land rights
- eroded
What happened
In 1951 the Shoshone Tribe asked the Indian Claims Commission for compensation for the loss of aboriginal title to lands in several Western states. The Commission held that the title had been extinguished and later awarded $26 million. The Court of Claims affirmed.
The award was certified, and under a federal statute that certification automatically appropriated the amount. The money was deposited for the Tribe in an interest-bearing trust account in the United States Treasury. The Secretary of the Interior is required to submit to Congress a plan for distributing the fund, after consulting with the Tribe. The Secretary had not done so, because of the Tribe's refusal to cooperate.
The United States later brought a trespass action against members of the Tribe for grazing livestock without a permit on land involved in the earlier proceeding. They claimed aboriginal title to the land, so the government could not require grazing permits. The district court held that the title had been extinguished when the Commission's final award was certified for payment. The Ninth Circuit reversed.
On February 20, 1985, Justice Brennan wrote for a unanimous Court that "payment" under the Indian Claims Commission Act occurred when the funds "were placed by the United States into an account in the Treasury for the Tribe." Waiting for Congress to approve a distribution plan would frustrate the Act's purpose of disposing of Indian claims with finality. The Court reversed and remanded.
Good to know. The opinion calls the claimants the Shoshone Tribe; it does not say 'Western Shoshone.'
Summarized with AI assistance from 3 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error
What the sources say, and how this was checked
Well supported by the sources below.
Payment" occurred under § 22(a) when the funds in question were placed by the United States into an account in the Treasury for the Tribe.
United States v. Dann, 470 U.S. 39 (1985) (U.S. Reports, Library of Congress)the Indian Claims Commission (Commission) entered an interlocutory order holding that aboriginal title had been extinguished and later awarded $26 million
United States v. Dann, 470 U.S. 39 (1985) (U.S. Reports, Library of Congress)BRENNAN, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
United States v. Dann, 470 U.S. 39 (1985) (U.S. Reports, Library of Congress)
Research notes. The opinion calls the claimants the Shoshone Tribe and does not say "Western Shoshone"; the Western Shoshone National Council appears only as a friend-of-the-court filer. The atlas page statement that the Western Shoshone dispute the extinguishment and that the dispute continues is not supported by an opened source and is not asserted here.
Who is doing the work
This history belongs to living nations. Start with them:
- Eastern Shoshone Tribe of the Wind River Reservation, Wyoming
- Northwestern Band of the Shoshone Nation
- Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation
- Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians of Nevada (Four constituent bands: Battle Mountain Band; Elko Band; South Fork Band; and Wells Band)
- Duckwater Shoshone Tribe
- Ely Shoshone Tribe of Nevada
- Shoshone-Paiute Tribes of the Duck Valley Reservation, Nevada
- Yomba Shoshone Tribe of the Yomba Reservation, Nevada
Native legal and land defense, nationally
- Native American Rights Fund (NARF) Native-led Litigation and legal advocacy for tribal sovereignty, treaty rights, land and resources Give on their site Website
- NDN Collective (LANDBACK Campaign) Native-led LANDBACK campaign (launched 2020; Mount Rushmore closure and return of Black Hills public lands), Indigenous… Give on their site Website
- Indian Land Tenure Foundation (ILTF) Native-led Land recovery and control by tribes and individual Indian landowners Website
- Decolonizing Wealth Project (Indigenous Earth Fund; California Tribal Land Return) Native-led Reparative philanthropy Give on their site Website
Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.
Connections
Links marked “suggested” were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.
Doctrine applied 3
Decided a dispute over 2
Concerns the instrument 1
- Treaty of Ruby Valley (Western Shoshone), 18631863suggested
Policy era 1
- Self-Determination1970suggested
Nations named 1
- Western Shoshone (Newe)suggested
Sources
- supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/470/39/legal text copy
The record’s fields
- Holding
- Under the Indian Claims Commission Act, 'payment' of a tribal award occurred when funds were deposited in a Treasury trust account, so the Act barred the Danns from asserting tribal aboriginal title as a defense. The Court expressed no opinion on whether individual aboriginal title could be raised and left that question for the lower courts.
- Kind
- Court case
- Confidence
- High