Statute
Rhode Island Indian Claims Settlement Act
The 1978 Rhode Island Indian Claims Settlement Act gave the Narragansett about 1,800 acres in exchange for giving up land claims.
- Citation
- Pub. L. 95-395, 92 Stat. 813 (Sept. 30, 1978); 25 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.
- Year
- 1978
- Effect on land rights
- mixed
What happened
In the 1970s the Narragansett Tribe sued to recover ancestral land in Rhode Island. As the Supreme Court later described it, the Tribe claimed the State had misappropriated its territory in violation of the Indian Non-Intercourse Act, 25 U.S.C. 177. The claims were resolved by an act of Congress approved September 30, 1978.
The Act approved the transfers at issue. It provided that land transfers by or on behalf of Indians in Rhode Island "shall be deemed to have been made in accordance with the Constitution and all laws of the United States," including the Trade and Intercourse Act of 1790, and that Congress "does hereby approve any such transfer." To the extent aboriginal title was involved, that approval was treated as extinguishing it, and it barred related claims.
In return, Carcieri v. Salazar (2009) describes the settlement this way: "the Tribe received title to 1,800 acres of land in Charlestown, Rhode Island, in exchange for relinquishing its past and future claims to land based on aboriginal title." The Tribe also agreed that the land would be subject to the civil and criminal laws and jurisdiction of the State of Rhode Island.
The Tribe gained formal federal recognition in 1983, and the Secretary of the Interior accepted a deed of trust to the 1,800 acres in 1988. A later fight over an additional 31-acre parcel reached the Supreme Court, which held that the Secretary lacked authority to take it into trust.
Good to know. The Act describes about 900 acres of private settlement lands plus public lands; the 1,800-acre total comes from the Supreme Court's description in Carcieri.
Summarized with AI assistance from 4 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error
What the sources say, and how this was checked
Well supported by the sources below.
shall be deemed to have been made in accordance with the Constitution and all laws of the United States
Rhode Island Indian Claims Settlement Act, Pub. L. 95-395, 92 Stat. 813 (Sept. 30, 1978)Congress does hereby approve any such transfer effective as of the date of said transfer
Rhode Island Indian Claims Settlement Act, Pub. L. 95-395, 92 Stat. 813 (Sept. 30, 1978)the Tribe received title to 1,800 acres of land in Charlestown, Rhode Island, in exchange for relinquishing its past and future claims
Carcieri v. Salazar, 555 U.S. 379 (2009), U.S. ReportsThe Tribe gained formal recognition from the Federal Government in 1983
Carcieri v. Salazar, 555 U.S. 379 (2009), U.S. Reports
Research notes. The Act itself describes the settlement in terms of about 900 acres of private settlement lands plus public settlement lands; the 1,800-acre total comes from the Supreme Court's description in Carcieri. The 'state-chartered settlement corporation' in the record corresponds to the 'State Corporation' and 'Indian Corporation' in the Act and was not examined in detail. The Act's full list of tribal, state and federal obligations was not read.
Who is doing the work
Native legal and land defense, nationally
- Native American Rights Fund (NARF) Native-led Litigation and legal advocacy for tribal sovereignty, treaty rights, land and resources Give on their site Website
- NDN Collective (LANDBACK Campaign) Native-led LANDBACK campaign (launched 2020; Mount Rushmore closure and return of Black Hills public lands), Indigenous… Give on their site Website
- Indian Land Tenure Foundation (ILTF) Native-led Land recovery and control by tribes and individual Indian landowners Website
- Decolonizing Wealth Project (Indigenous Earth Fund; California Tribal Land Return) Native-led Reparative philanthropy Give on their site Website
Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.
Connections
Links marked “suggested” were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.
Doctrine applied 3
Policy era 1
- Self-Determination1970suggested
Sources
No source is linked to this record yet. That is a gap we are working to close.
- Kind
- Statute
- Confidence
- High