Statute

Rhode Island Indian Claims Settlement Act

The 1978 Rhode Island Indian Claims Settlement Act gave the Narragansett about 1,800 acres in exchange for giving up land claims.

Citation
Pub. L. 95-395, 92 Stat. 813 (Sept. 30, 1978); 25 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.
Year
1978
Effect on land rights
mixed

What happened

In the 1970s the Narragansett Tribe sued to recover ancestral land in Rhode Island. As the Supreme Court later described it, the Tribe claimed the State had misappropriated its territory in violation of the Indian Non-Intercourse Act, 25 U.S.C. 177. The claims were resolved by an act of Congress approved September 30, 1978.

The Act approved the transfers at issue. It provided that land transfers by or on behalf of Indians in Rhode Island "shall be deemed to have been made in accordance with the Constitution and all laws of the United States," including the Trade and Intercourse Act of 1790, and that Congress "does hereby approve any such transfer." To the extent aboriginal title was involved, that approval was treated as extinguishing it, and it barred related claims.

In return, Carcieri v. Salazar (2009) describes the settlement this way: "the Tribe received title to 1,800 acres of land in Charlestown, Rhode Island, in exchange for relinquishing its past and future claims to land based on aboriginal title." The Tribe also agreed that the land would be subject to the civil and criminal laws and jurisdiction of the State of Rhode Island.

The Tribe gained formal federal recognition in 1983, and the Secretary of the Interior accepted a deed of trust to the 1,800 acres in 1988. A later fight over an additional 31-acre parcel reached the Supreme Court, which held that the Secretary lacked authority to take it into trust.

Good to know. The Act describes about 900 acres of private settlement lands plus public lands; the 1,800-acre total comes from the Supreme Court's description in Carcieri.

Summarized with AI assistance from 4 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error

What the sources say, and how this was checked

Well supported by the sources below.

  1. shall be deemed to have been made in accordance with the Constitution and all laws of the United StatesRhode Island Indian Claims Settlement Act, Pub. L. 95-395, 92 Stat. 813 (Sept. 30, 1978)
  2. Congress does hereby approve any such transfer effective as of the date of said transferRhode Island Indian Claims Settlement Act, Pub. L. 95-395, 92 Stat. 813 (Sept. 30, 1978)
  3. the Tribe received title to 1,800 acres of land in Charlestown, Rhode Island, in exchange for relinquishing its past and future claimsCarcieri v. Salazar, 555 U.S. 379 (2009), U.S. Reports
  4. The Tribe gained formal recognition from the Federal Government in 1983Carcieri v. Salazar, 555 U.S. 379 (2009), U.S. Reports

Research notes. The Act itself describes the settlement in terms of about 900 acres of private settlement lands plus public settlement lands; the 1,800-acre total comes from the Supreme Court's description in Carcieri. The 'state-chartered settlement corporation' in the record corresponds to the 'State Corporation' and 'Indian Corporation' in the Act and was not examined in detail. The Act's full list of tribal, state and federal obligations was not read.

Who is doing the work

Native legal and land defense, nationally

Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.

Connections

Links marked “suggested” were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.

Doctrine applied 3

Policy era 1

Sources

No source is linked to this record yet. That is a gap we are working to close.

Kind
Statute
Confidence
High

Correct this record