Statute
TLA-S-ANCSA1971Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA)
ANCSA in 1971 extinguished Alaska Native aboriginal land claims in exchange for corporation-held land and money, not reservations.
- Citation
- Pub. L. 92-203, 85 Stat. 688 (Dec. 18, 1971); 43 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.
- Year
- 1971
- Effect on land rights
- mixed
What happened
The Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) became law on December 18, 1971. Its findings say there was "an immediate need for a fair and just settlement of all claims by Natives and Native groups of Alaska, based on aboriginal land claims." They add that the settlement should come "rapidly, with certainty" and "without litigation," and "without creating a reservation system or lengthy wardship or trusteeship."
Section 4 (43 U.S.C. 1603) is the extinguishment clause: "All aboriginal titles, if any, and claims of aboriginal title in Alaska based on use and occupancy, including submerged land underneath all water areas, both inland and offshore, and including any aboriginal hunting or fishing rights that may exist, are hereby extinguished." It also ends claims based on any statute or treaty relating to Native use and occupancy, including claims pending before courts or the Indian Claims Commission.
In return, the Supreme Court's summary in Alaska v. Native Village of Venetie (1998) says ANCSA revoked the Venetie Reservation and all but one of the other Native reserves, and authorized transferring $962.5 million and about 44 million acres of land to state-chartered private business corporations formed by Alaska Natives. Those corporations received fee simple title, with no federal restrictions on later transfers.
That structure mattered later. In Venetie the Court held that the Tribe's former reservation land, which ANCSA conveyed to its corporations and they then transferred to the Tribe, was not "Indian country," so the Tribe could not tax a non-member contractor.
Good to know. The $962.5 million and 44 million acre figures are as the Supreme Court described the Act.
Summarized with AI assistance from 5 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error
What the sources say, and how this was checked
Well supported by the sources below.
an immediate need for a fair and just settlement of all claims by Natives and Native groups of Alaska
43 U.S. Code sec. 1601 (ANCSA findings), Cornell LIIwithout creating a reservation system or lengthy wardship or trusteeship
43 U.S. Code sec. 1601 (ANCSA findings), Cornell LIIincluding any aboriginal hunting or fishing rights that may exist, are hereby extinguished
43 U.S. Code sec. 1603 (extinguishment), Cornell LIIauthorized the transfer of $962.5 million in federal funds and approximately 44 million acres of Alaska land
Alaska v. Native Village of Venetie Tribal Government, 522 U.S. 520 (1998), Cornell LIIHeld: The Tribe's land is not "Indian country.''
Alaska v. Native Village of Venetie Tribal Government, 522 U.S. 520 (1998), Cornell LII
Research notes. The $962.5 million and 44 million acre figures come from the Supreme Court's description rather than from the statute sections opened here. Later amendments to ANCSA and the details of subsistence law are not covered. The Venetie holding concerns one tribe's former reservation land conveyed to corporations; its wider effect on other Alaska land was not reviewed.
Who is doing the work
Native legal and land defense, nationally
- Native American Rights Fund (NARF) Native-led Litigation and legal advocacy for tribal sovereignty, treaty rights, land and resources Give on their site Website
- NDN Collective (LANDBACK Campaign) Native-led LANDBACK campaign (launched 2020; Mount Rushmore closure and return of Black Hills public lands), Indigenous… Give on their site Website
- Indian Land Tenure Foundation (ILTF) Native-led Land recovery and control by tribes and individual Indian landowners Website
- Decolonizing Wealth Project (Indigenous Earth Fund; California Tribal Land Return) Native-led Reparative philanthropy Give on their site Website
Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.
Connections
Links marked “suggested” were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.
Doctrine applied 3
Policy era 1
- Self-Determination1970suggested
Responds to 1
- Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States1955suggested
Used to carry out 1
Sources
- Kind
- Statute
- Confidence
- High