Court case

Choctaw Nation v. United States

The Court awarded the Choctaw Nation payment for lands ceded in the 1830 treaty, using the Senate's award as its guide.

Citation
119 U.S. 1 (1886)
Court
U.S. Supreme Court
Year
1886
Nations
Choctaw Nation
Treaty at issue
Treaty of Dancing Rabbit Creek (1830) and later Choctaw treatiesnot yet checked against a source
Effect on land rights
advanced

What happened

By the Treaty of September 27, 1830, the Choctaw Nation ceded its lands to the United States. The Choctaws later claimed that the United States had broken that treaty and that they should receive the proceeds of the sale of the ceded lands. In the Treaty of June 22, 1855, the two sides submitted their disputes to the United States Senate, which acted as arbitrator. The Senate's award was later computed by the Secretary of the Interior at $2,981,247.30.

In 1881 Congress authorized the Court of Claims to "take jurisdiction of and try all questions of difference arising out of treaty stipulations with the Choctaw nation" and to review them de novo, meaning from scratch. The Court of Claims found a balance due the Nation of $408,120.32. Both the Nation and the United States appealed.

The Supreme Court reversed. It said that when the United States deals with tribes under its "care and control," its acts and promises are to be interpreted as "justice and reason demand." It held that the Senate's award "furnishes the nearest approximation to the justice and right of the case." The judgment was for $2,981,247.30, subject to the deduction of $250,000 paid under the act of 1861, plus $59,445.32 in unpaid annuities and $68,102 for lands taken in fixing the Arkansas boundary. Chief Justice Waite dissented.

The Court's reading of the 1881 act meant the Senate award, not the Court of Claims' smaller figure, set the measure of what the Choctaws were owed.

Good to know. Dollar figures are as printed in the U.S. Reports, which has small inconsistencies (for example $59,449.32 in an exhibit versus $59,445.32 in the judgment for one annuity).

Summarized with AI assistance from 4 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error

What the sources say, and how this was checked

Well supported by the sources below.

  1. furnishes the nearest approximation to the justice and right of the caseChoctaw Nation v. United States, 119 U.S. 1 (1886) (U.S. Reports, Library of Congress)
  2. to take jurisdiction of and try all questions of difference arising out of treaty stipulations with the Choctaw nationChoctaw Nation v. United States, 119 U.S. 1 (1886) (U.S. Reports, Library of Congress)
  3. the Treaty of September 27, 1830, 7 Stat. 333Choctaw Nation v. United States, 119 U.S. 1 (1886) (U.S. Reports, Library of Congress)
  4. are to be interpreted as justice and reason demand in cases where power is exerted by the strongChoctaw Nation v. United States, 119 U.S. 1 (1886) (U.S. Reports, Library of Congress)

Research notes. Dollar figures are as printed in the U.S. Reports (the scan has some typographical errors, such as a minor variation in one listed annuity figure of $59,449.32 in an exhibit versus $59,445.32 in the judgment). I read the syllabus, statement of facts and the end of the opinion, not all of the roughly 100 pages. The treaty text itself was not opened.

Removal treatyShapes from the 1899 federal record: approximate, not legal boundaries.

Who is doing the work

This history belongs to living nations. Start with them:

Native legal and land defense, nationally

Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.

Connections

Links marked “suggested” were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.

Doctrine applied 2

Concerns the instrument 1

Policy era 1

Nations named 1

Sources

  1. supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/119/1/legal text copy
The record’s fields
Holding
Treated the Senate's 1859 arbitration award as the closest approximation of justice and held the Choctaw entitled to further sums for unpaid annuities and land lost in the Arkansas boundary survey. Often cited for reading treaties as the Indians understood them.not yet checked against a source
Kind
Court case
Confidence
High
Notes
  • Some details not yet checked against a source

Correct this record