Court case

Shoshone Tribe v. United States

In 1937 the Court held that settling Arapahoes on the Shoshone reservation was a taking for which the Shoshones were owed just compensation.

Citation
299 U.S. 476 (1937)
Court
U.S. Supreme Court
Year
1937
Nations
Eastern Shoshone (Wind River Reservation)
Treaty at issue
Fort Bridger Treaty of 1868 (Shoshone)
Effect on land rights
advanced

What happened

By a treaty of July 3, 1868, a reservation was set apart for the Shoshone Indians exclusively. On March 18, 1878, a band of Arapahoes, under military escort, settled on the land, and others did so later.

According to the Supreme Court, the Commissioner of Indian Affairs directed or sanctioned these moves, intending the settlements to be permanent. From then on he treated the two tribes as equal beneficiaries of the reservation, a view that at length found support in Acts of Congress dealing with cessions of land and allotment. The Shoshones protested consistently against the invasion of their rights. In 1927 Congress passed a jurisdictional act letting them sue in the Court of Claims for the taking of an undivided one-half interest in their tribal lands.

The case reached the Supreme Court on both sides' petitions, and on January 4, 1937 the Court reversed the Court of Claims' judgment on how to measure the award. It held that the guardianship of the United States "does not enable the Government to require a tribe" with an exclusive treaty right of occupancy "to share it with another tribe without just compensation."

A taking, the Court said, may be partial and need not involve complete eviction. The government's later actions ratified the original wrongful entry, so damages should be measured as of March 18, 1878. The Shoshones were also entitled to interest or a fair equivalent on top of the land's value.

Summarized with AI assistance from 3 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error

What the sources say, and how this was checked

Well supported by the sources below.

  1. By treaty of July 3, 1868, a reservation was set apart for the Shoshone Indians exclusively.Shoshone Tribe of Indians v. United States, 299 U.S. 476 (1937) (U.S. Reports, Library of Congress)
  2. A taking of land may be partial, not involving complete eviction.Shoshone Tribe of Indians v. United States, 299 U.S. 476 (1937) (U.S. Reports, Library of Congress)
  3. Damages should be measured as of that date.Shoshone Tribe of Indians v. United States, 299 U.S. 476 (1937) (U.S. Reports, Library of Congress)

Research notes. The syllabus gives the treaty date (July 3, 1868) but does not name the treaty; the atlas page calls it the Fort Bridger Treaty. The syllabus does not state a dollar amount and none is given here. The quoted guardianship phrasing is from the syllabus.

Treaty or agreementShapes from the 1899 federal record: approximate, not legal boundaries.

Who is doing the work

This history belongs to living nations. Start with them:

Native legal and land defense, nationally

Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.

Connections

Links marked “suggested” were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.

Doctrine applied 3

Concerns the instrument 1

Policy era 1

Nations named 1

Sources

  1. supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/299/476/legal text copy
The record’s fields
Holding
Where a treaty recognized the Shoshone's right to the reservation, later government placement of Arapaho there was a compensable taking; damages measured from the 1878 unlawful occupation plus added compensation such as interest.
Kind
Court case
Confidence
High

Correct this record