All treaties and agreements

SouthwestTreaty

Treaty with the Apache (Santa Fe), 1852

The 1852 Santa Fe treaty made peace with Apache chiefs, placed them under U.S. jurisdiction and promised to set their boundaries later.

Signed
July 1, 1852
Senate
Ratified

What happened

What happened

On July 1, 1852, at Santa Fe, Colonel E. V. Sumner and Indian agent John Greiner signed a treaty for the United States with seven chiefs acting for the Apache Nation, including Mangus Colorado. In Article 1 the Apaches declared that they were lawfully and exclusively under the laws, jurisdiction and government of the United States, and to its power and authority they "do hereby submit."

Articles 2 to 5 set perpetual peace, bound the Apaches to treat citizens of the United States honestly, and had them refrain from raids into Mexico and surrender captives. Article 6 said any United States citizen who murdered, robbed or maltreated an Apache would be arrested and tried. Article 7 gave free and safe passage through their territory, and Article 8 let the United States establish military posts, agencies and trading houses. In Article 9 the Apaches agreed that the United States would, at its earliest convenience, "designate, settle, and adjust their territorial boundaries." The treaty cedes no land and names no boundary. It was proclaimed on March 25, 1853.

A 2024 Ninth Circuit decision about a federal land transfer to a mining company recounts what followed. Chief Judge Murguia's dissent says Apache leaders signed "to make peace," but that conflict continued as more settlers, miners and soldiers entered Apache land, resulting in several massacres of Apaches by soldiers and civilians. It says that by the late 1870s the United States had forcibly removed the Apaches onto reservations. The majority held that, even assuming the Apaches' reading of the treaty was correct, the statute "clearly abrogates any contrary treaty obligation," so the treaty did not stop the transfer.

Good to know. The account of what followed comes from a dissenting opinion in a later court case.

Summarized with AI assistance from 5 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error

What the sources say, and how this was checked

Supported by the sources below; some details rest on one source.

  1. the government of the United States shall at its earliest convenience designate, settle, and adjust their territorial boundariesTreaty with the Apache, 1852 (OSU Tribal Treaties Database)
  2. they are lawfully and exclusively under the laws, jurisdiction, and government of the United States of AmericaTreaty with the Apache, 1852 (OSU Tribal Treaties Database)
  3. To make peace, various Apache leaders signed the Treaty of Santa Fe in 1852Apache Stronghold v. United States, No. 21-15295 (9th Cir. en banc, Mar. 1, 2024)
  4. clearly abrogates any contrary treaty obligation, not the other way around.Apache Stronghold v. United States, No. 21-15295 (9th Cir. en banc, Mar. 1, 2024)
  5. Mangus ColoradoTreaty with the Apache, 10 Stat. 979 (govinfo)

Research notes. The account of what followed comes from the opinion's dissent, which also recounts that the Apaches were removed by the late 1870s. The majority assumed the plaintiff's reading of the treaty without deciding it. The treaty text names the chiefs but not their bands, and the cited sources do not say which present-day Apache nations descend from them. Later proceedings in that case are not covered here.

What happened next

Everything the record holds about this land and this treaty, in order: what earlier agreements said, what this one did, and what the United States, the courts and the nations did afterwards.

  1. 1852

    This treaty

    Signed

    The 1852 Santa Fe treaty made peace with Apache chiefs, placed them under U.S. jurisdiction and promised to set their boundaries later.

  2. 1876

    Promise broken

    Chiricahua Apache: the 1872 reservation abolished (1876) and 27 years as prisoners of war (1886-1912/14)

    A Chiricahua reservation was created in 1872 and abolished after Cochise died; after Geronimo's 1886 surrender the people were held as prisoners of war.

  3. 2014

    Related history

    Oak Flat (Chi'chil Bildagoteel): 2014 land exchange, Apache Stronghold litigation and the March 2026 transfer

    A 2014 law authorized a land exchange, and Oak Flat passed to Resolution Copper in March 2026 despite Apache opposition.

  4. 2024

    In court

    Apache Stronghold v. United States (Oak Flat; Chi'chil Bildagoteel)

    The en banc Ninth Circuit affirmed denial of an injunction against the Oak Flat land transfer, rejecting religious freedom and treaty claims.

  5. 2026

    In court

    Lopez v. United States (Oak Flat application)

    Justice Kagan denied an emergency application by Apache plaintiffs to stop the Oak Flat land exchange on March 19, 2026.

The law behind it

The legal ideas behind the decisions, and related records without a date. Court cases and laws with a date are in what happened next, above.

  • Legal doctrine

    land exchange

    Congress authorized the Oak Flat land exchange with Resolution Copper in 2014; Apache Stronghold's religious-freedom challenge failed, with two justices dissenting.

  • Legal doctrine

    religious freedom

    Lyng (1988) rejected a Native challenge to a Forest Service road, and Oak Flat's religious-freedom challenge was denied Supreme Court review in 2025.

  • Legal doctrine

    sacred sites

    Sacred-site protection on federal land rests mainly on Executive Order 13007 and consultation laws; Lyng (1988) found no enforceable right under AIRFA.

  • Legal doctrine

    treaty trust claim

    Courts have refused to read treaties as creating enforceable federal trust duties beyond their text, in Arizona v. Navajo Nation and Apache Stronghold.

Who is doing the work today

The nations connected to this treaty come first, then groups returning land and defending treaty rights. Support goes directly to them.

Who is doing the work

This history belongs to living nations. Start with them:

Native legal and land defense, nationally

Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.

Sources

Sources

  1. digitreaties.org/treaties/treaty/175192410reference work
Research notes

Kappler page.

Shapes are approximate and are not legal descriptions of land, title or jurisdiction.