Doctrine

land exchange

Congress authorized the Oak Flat land exchange with Resolution Copper in 2014; Apache Stronghold's religious-freedom challenge failed, with two justices dissenting.

Definition
A congressionally authorized swap of federal land for private land (Oak Flat).

What happened

A land exchange swaps federal land for private land by act of Congress. The best-known recent example is Oak Flat in Arizona, authorized by section 3003 of a 2014 defense bill, now codified at 16 U.S.C. 539p. The statute defines the federal land as approximately 2,422 acres in Pinal County, Arizona, and orders the Secretary of Agriculture, "not later than 60 days after the date of publication of the final environmental impact statement," to convey it to Resolution Copper, which in turn conveys specified non-federal parcels to the United States.

The statute includes process steps for tribes. It directs the Secretary to "engage in government-to-government consultation with affected Indian tribes" and to seek mutually acceptable measures to address their concerns. It also requires an environmental impact statement that assesses effects on cultural and archeological resources.

Apache Stronghold, a nonprofit, sued under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. The en banc Ninth Circuit rejected the challenge in 2024. The Supreme Court denied certiorari on May 27, 2025. Justice Gorsuch, joined by Justice Thomas, dissented, writing that "It is undisputed" that the government's plan will permanently "destroy the Apaches' historical place of worship"; he called the Court's refusal to hear the case "a grave mistake."

Good to know. Justice Gorsuch's words are from a dissent; the Court's majority gave no opinion when it declined the case.

Summarized with AI assistance from 4 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error

What the sources say, and how this was checked

Supported by the sources below; some details rest on one source.

  1. not later than 60 days after the date of publication of the final environmental impact statement, the Secretary shall convey all right, title, and interest16 U.S.C. 539p, Southeast Arizona land exchange (NDAA FY2015 sec. 3003), Cornell LII
  2. shall engage in government-to-government consultation with affected Indian tribes16 U.S.C. 539p, Cornell LII
  3. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.Apache Stronghold v. United States, No. 24-291 (U.S. May 27, 2025), Cornell LII
  4. It is undisputed” that the government’s plan will permanently “destroy the Apaches’ historical place of worshipApache Stronghold v. United States, No. 24-291 (U.S. May 27, 2025), Cornell LII

Research notes. Justice Gorsuch's words are the dissent's description of the facts and a view of the law; the majority gave no opinion. The statute's text was read in the Cornell codification, which spans the text of a 2014 law; the Public Law number (113-291) and its date were not confirmed on the page. The Ninth Circuit's 6-5 en banc vote and its reasoning were taken from a search summary and the dissent, not from the opinion text. Later 2026 emergency litigation by other plaintiffs exists but was not read. The statute defines 'Secretary' as the Secretary of Agriculture (same page). No sacred site location beyond the public name Oak Flat is given.

Who is doing the work

Native legal and land defense, nationally

Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.

Connections

Applied in 3

Sources

No source is linked to this record yet. That is a gap we are working to close.

Kind
Doctrine
Confidence
Medium

Correct this record