Court case
Lopez v. United States (Oak Flat application)
Justice Kagan denied an emergency application by Apache plaintiffs to stop the Oak Flat land exchange on March 19, 2026.
- Citation
- No. 25A1008 (U.S. Mar. 19, 2026) (application denied)
- Court
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Year
- 2026
- Nations
- Western Apache (San Carlos Apache and Apache Stronghold-affiliated plaintiffs)not yet checked against a source
- Treaty at issue
- Treaty of Santa Fe (1852) invokednot yet checked against a source
- Effect on land rights
- eroded
What happened
Oak Flat is National Forest land in the Tonto National Forest. The Southeast Arizona Land Exchange and Conservation Act directs the Forest Service to transfer nearly 2,500 acres there, including Oak Flat, which the Ninth Circuit calls "an Apache ceremonial religious ground," to Resolution Copper. In exchange, Resolution Copper must provide over 5,000 acres of equally appraised land to the federal government.
Three groups sued: a coalition of conservation groups, the San Carlos Apache Tribe, and a separate set of Apache plaintiffs known as the Lopez plaintiffs. On March 13, 2026 the Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of a preliminary injunction. It held that the Lopez plaintiffs' claim under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and the Free Exercise Clause was foreclosed by precedent. The court wrote that "Congress has chosen to transfer this land, and Plaintiffs have not raised any viable challenges to that decision." Eos reported that the title transfer was completed the same day.
The Lopez plaintiffs then asked the Supreme Court for an injunction. The Supreme Court's docket for application No. 25A1008, Lopez v. United States, shows it was submitted to Justice Kagan and denied by her on March 19, 2026. It was a ruling on an emergency application, not an opinion of the full Court.
This application followed the earlier Apache Stronghold case, in which the Supreme Court denied certiorari in May 2025.
Good to know. The application was denied by Justice Kagan alone, not by the full Court. The transfer date comes from a secondary news source.
Summarized with AI assistance from 5 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error
What the sources say, and how this was checked
Well supported by the sources below.
Application (25A1008) denied by Justice Kagan.
Lopez v. United States, No. 25A1008 (U.S. Supreme Court docket)Congress has chosen to transfer this land, and Plaintiffs have not raised any viable challenges to that decision.
Arizona Mining Reform Coalition v. U.S. Forest Service, No. 25-5189 (9th Cir. Mar. 13, 2026, amended Apr. 8, 2026)The Land Exchange Act directs the United States Forest Service to transfer nearly 2,500 acres of National Forest land
Arizona Mining Reform Coalition v. U.S. Forest Service, No. 25-5189 (9th Cir. Mar. 13, 2026, amended Apr. 8, 2026)the title transfer of Arizona land from the federal government to mining venture Resolution Copper was completed on 13 March
Supreme Court rejects tribal appeal to halt planned copper mine (Eos, updated March 17, 2026)May 27 2025 Petition DENIED.
Apache Stronghold v. United States, No. 24-291 (U.S. Supreme Court docket)
Research notes. The docket shows the application was denied by Justice Kagan alone, not by the full Court; our page summary says 'The Court denied.' The transfer date (March 13, 2026) comes from an Eos update, a secondary source; the Ninth Circuit opinion in the same case is dated March 13 and amended April 8, 2026. Our data's 'more than 2,400 acres' transferred is consistent with the opinion's 'nearly 2,500 acres' but was not confirmed as the transferred amount. The Treaty of Santa Fe (1852) in our data is not discussed in these sources.
Who is doing the work
This history belongs to living nations. Start with them:
- Apache Tribe of Oklahoma
- Fort Sill Apache Tribe
- Jicarilla Apache Nation, New Mexico
- Lipan Apache Tribe of Texas
- Mescalero Apache Tribe
- Tonto Apache Tribe of Arizona
- White Mountain Apache Tribe of the Fort Apache Reservation, Arizona
- Yavapai-Apache Nation of the Camp Verde Indian Reservation, Arizona
Native legal and land defense, nationally
- Native American Rights Fund (NARF) Native-led Litigation and legal advocacy for tribal sovereignty, treaty rights, land and resources Give on their site Website
- NDN Collective (LANDBACK Campaign) Native-led LANDBACK campaign (launched 2020; Mount Rushmore closure and return of Black Hills public lands), Indigenous… Give on their site Website
- Indian Land Tenure Foundation (ILTF) Native-led Land recovery and control by tribes and individual Indian landowners Website
- Decolonizing Wealth Project (Indigenous Earth Fund; California Tribal Land Return) Native-led Reparative philanthropy Give on their site Website
Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.
Corrections to this record
- The holding was listed as “The Court denied an application to stop the Oak Flat land transfer to Resolution Copper (NARF memo lists it as denied Mar. 19, 2026); the Forest Service then transferred more than 2,400 acres.”; corrected from supremecourt.gov
application (25A1008) denied by Justice Kagan.
Connections
Links marked “suggested” were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.
Doctrine applied 3
Nations named 2
- Apachesuggested
- San Carlos Apache Tribesuggested
Concerns the instrument 1
- Treaty with the Apache (Santa Fe), 18521852suggested
Policy era 1
Sources
- supremecourt.gov/search.aspxprimary record
application (25A1008) denied by Justice Kagan.
- sct.narf.org/updatememos/2026/04-23-2026.pdfunclassified
The record’s fields
- Holding
- Justice Kagan denied an application to stop the Oak Flat land transfer to Resolution Copper (NARF memo lists it as denied Mar. 19, 2026); the Forest Service then transferred more than 2,400 acres.
- Kind
- Court case
- Confidence
- High
- Notes
- Some details not yet checked against a source