Court case

Lopez v. United States (Oak Flat application)

Justice Kagan denied an emergency application by Apache plaintiffs to stop the Oak Flat land exchange on March 19, 2026.

Citation
No. 25A1008 (U.S. Mar. 19, 2026) (application denied)
Court
U.S. Supreme Court
Year
2026
Nations
Western Apache (San Carlos Apache and Apache Stronghold-affiliated plaintiffs)not yet checked against a source
Treaty at issue
Treaty of Santa Fe (1852) invokednot yet checked against a source
Effect on land rights
eroded

What happened

Oak Flat is National Forest land in the Tonto National Forest. The Southeast Arizona Land Exchange and Conservation Act directs the Forest Service to transfer nearly 2,500 acres there, including Oak Flat, which the Ninth Circuit calls "an Apache ceremonial religious ground," to Resolution Copper. In exchange, Resolution Copper must provide over 5,000 acres of equally appraised land to the federal government.

Three groups sued: a coalition of conservation groups, the San Carlos Apache Tribe, and a separate set of Apache plaintiffs known as the Lopez plaintiffs. On March 13, 2026 the Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of a preliminary injunction. It held that the Lopez plaintiffs' claim under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and the Free Exercise Clause was foreclosed by precedent. The court wrote that "Congress has chosen to transfer this land, and Plaintiffs have not raised any viable challenges to that decision." Eos reported that the title transfer was completed the same day.

The Lopez plaintiffs then asked the Supreme Court for an injunction. The Supreme Court's docket for application No. 25A1008, Lopez v. United States, shows it was submitted to Justice Kagan and denied by her on March 19, 2026. It was a ruling on an emergency application, not an opinion of the full Court.

This application followed the earlier Apache Stronghold case, in which the Supreme Court denied certiorari in May 2025.

Good to know. The application was denied by Justice Kagan alone, not by the full Court. The transfer date comes from a secondary news source.

Summarized with AI assistance from 5 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error

What the sources say, and how this was checked

Well supported by the sources below.

  1. Application (25A1008) denied by Justice Kagan.Lopez v. United States, No. 25A1008 (U.S. Supreme Court docket)
  2. Congress has chosen to transfer this land, and Plaintiffs have not raised any viable challenges to that decision.Arizona Mining Reform Coalition v. U.S. Forest Service, No. 25-5189 (9th Cir. Mar. 13, 2026, amended Apr. 8, 2026)
  3. The Land Exchange Act directs the United States Forest Service to transfer nearly 2,500 acres of National Forest landArizona Mining Reform Coalition v. U.S. Forest Service, No. 25-5189 (9th Cir. Mar. 13, 2026, amended Apr. 8, 2026)
  4. the title transfer of Arizona land from the federal government to mining venture Resolution Copper was completed on 13 MarchSupreme Court rejects tribal appeal to halt planned copper mine (Eos, updated March 17, 2026)
  5. May 27 2025 Petition DENIED.Apache Stronghold v. United States, No. 24-291 (U.S. Supreme Court docket)

Research notes. The docket shows the application was denied by Justice Kagan alone, not by the full Court; our page summary says 'The Court denied.' The transfer date (March 13, 2026) comes from an Eos update, a secondary source; the Ninth Circuit opinion in the same case is dated March 13 and amended April 8, 2026. Our data's 'more than 2,400 acres' transferred is consistent with the opinion's 'nearly 2,500 acres' but was not confirmed as the transferred amount. The Treaty of Santa Fe (1852) in our data is not discussed in these sources.

Who is doing the work

This history belongs to living nations. Start with them:

Native legal and land defense, nationally

Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.

Corrections to this record

  • The holding was listed as “The Court denied an application to stop the Oak Flat land transfer to Resolution Copper (NARF memo lists it as denied Mar. 19, 2026); the Forest Service then transferred more than 2,400 acres.”; corrected from supremecourt.govapplication (25A1008) denied by Justice Kagan.

Connections

Links marked “suggested” were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.

Doctrine applied 3

Nations named 2

Concerns the instrument 1

Policy era 1

Sources

  1. supremecourt.gov/search.aspxprimary record
    application (25A1008) denied by Justice Kagan.
  2. sct.narf.org/updatememos/2026/04-23-2026.pdfunclassified
The record’s fields
Holding
Justice Kagan denied an application to stop the Oak Flat land transfer to Resolution Copper (NARF memo lists it as denied Mar. 19, 2026); the Forest Service then transferred more than 2,400 acres.
Kind
Court case
Confidence
High
Notes
  • Some details not yet checked against a source

Correct this record