Treaty of St. Louis with the Sauk and Fox, 1804
Sauk and Fox chiefs ceded land along the Mississippi in 1804; many Sauk and Meskwaki, including Black Hawk, later called the treaty void.
- Signed
- November 3, 1804
- Senate
- Ratified January 25, 1805
- Land given up
- about 16 million acres
What happened
What happened
On November 3, 1804, at St. Louis, William Henry Harrison, governor of Indiana Territory, signed a treaty with chiefs and head men of the "united Sac and Fox tribes." In Article 1 the United States took the tribes into its "friendship and protection," and the tribes agreed to consider themselves under the protection of the United States and "no other power."
Article 2 drew a boundary line. It began on the Missouri River opposite the mouth of the Gasconade, ran to the river the text calls the Jeffreon and down it to the Mississippi, then up the Mississippi to the Wisconsin River, and across to the Illinois River. The tribes ceded "all the lands included within the above-described boundary." The price was goods worth $2,234.50 delivered at signing and an annuity of $1,000 in goods. Article 7 said that as long as the ceded lands stayed U.S. property, the Sauk and Fox could live and hunt on them.
A history from Before Knox says many Meskwaki and Sauk, including the Sauk leader Black Hawk, considered the treaty void because it was "signed in the absence of important leaders and without the consent of the Tribal Council." The same page says Fort Madison, built in 1808 on the side of the Mississippi meant for the Sauk and Meskwaki, called the treaty's legitimacy into question.
In 1816 the Sauk of Rock River signed a treaty with the United States that confirmed the 1804 treaty; it appears elsewhere in the atlas.
Good to know. Whether the 1804 signers had authority to cede the land is disputed; the "under pressure" description rests on that dispute, not on any account of force or threats.
Summarized with AI assistance from 5 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error
What the sources say, and how this was checked
Well supported by the sources below.
do hereby cede and relinquish forever to the United States, all the lands included within the above-described boundary
Treaty with the Sauk and Foxes, 1804 (Oklahoma State University Tribal Treaties Database)goods suited to the circumstances of the Indians of the value of one thousand dollars
Treaty with the Sauk and Foxes, 1804 (Oklahoma State University Tribal Treaties Database)was signed in the absence of important leaders and without the consent of the Tribal Council
The Black Hawk War and Treaties (Before Knox)The construction of Fort Madison on the western side of the Mississippi in 1808 also called the legitimacy of the treaty into question
The Black Hawk War and Treaties (Before Knox)do hereby unconditionally assent to recognize, re-establish, and confirm the treaty
Treaty with the Sauk, 1816 (Oklahoma State University Tribal Treaties Database)
Research notes. Whether the 1804 signers had authority to cede the land is disputed; the Before Knox page is a college-linked history, not a scholarly article, and gives Black Hawk's view only through that account. No acreage is stated in the OSU text. The 'under pressure' label rests on the disputed authority of the signers, not on any source describing force or threats.
What the treaty did to the land
About 16 million acres given up. Each shape is a numbered area in the federal government’s 1899 record of land cessions.
ceded to the United Statesabout 16 million acres
Land of the Sauk and Fox in Illinois, Missouri and Wisconsin, ceded 1804 (area 50)
Ceded by the united Sauk and Fox at St. Louis in November 1804; the Sauk, the Fox and the Sauk of Rock River each agreed to and confirmed that treaty in 1815 and 1816.
ceded to the United States
Land of the Sauk and Fox in Wisconsin, ceded 1804 (area 51)
Ceded by the Sauk and Fox in the November 1804 treaty, a 2-mile-square tract in Wisconsin for a military post; Sauk and Fox bands confirmed that treaty in 1815 and 1816.
What happened next
Everything the record holds about this land and this treaty, in order: what earlier agreements said, what this one did, and what the United States, the courts and the nations did afterwards.
- 1804
This treaty
About 16 million acres ceded to the United States by the Sauk and Fox
Sauk and Fox chiefs ceded land along the Mississippi in 1804; many Sauk and Meskwaki, including Black Hawk, later called the treaty void.
- 1804
Promise broken
Treaty of St. Louis 1804: cession signed by a delegation with no authority to sell
A Sauk and Fox delegation ceded land at St. Louis in 1804 for goods and an annuity; Black Hawk later said they lacked authority.
- 1805
This treaty
Ratified by the Senate
- 1815
Land record
Earlier terms confirmed for the land of the Sauk and Fox
By Sauk at Portage des Sioux (1815)
- 1815
Land record
Earlier terms confirmed for the land of the Sauk and Fox
By Fox at Portage des Sioux (1815)
- 1816
Land record
Earlier terms confirmed for the land of the Sauk and Fox
By Treaty of St. Louis with the Sauk of Rock River, 1816
Who is doing the work today
The nations connected to this treaty come first, then groups returning land and defending treaty rights. Support goes directly to them.
Who is doing the work
This history belongs to living nations. Start with them:
- Sac & Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Iowa
- Sac & Fox Nation of Missouri in Kansas and Nebraska
- Sac & Fox Nation, Oklahoma
Native legal and land defense, nationally
- Native American Rights Fund (NARF) Native-led Litigation and legal advocacy for tribal sovereignty, treaty rights, land and resources Give on their site Website
- NDN Collective (LANDBACK Campaign) Native-led LANDBACK campaign (launched 2020; Mount Rushmore closure and return of Black Hills public lands), Indigenous… Give on their site Website
- Indian Land Tenure Foundation (ILTF) Native-led Land recovery and control by tribes and individual Indian landowners Website
- Decolonizing Wealth Project (Indigenous Earth Fund; California Tribal Land Return) Native-led Reparative philanthropy Give on their site Website
Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.
Sources
Sources
- digitreaties.org/treaties/treaty/7891102reference work
Research notes
Signatories lacked tribal authority to cede (Wikipedia, pointer); never accepted by Black Hawk. Reaffirmed in 1815 and 1816 (RIT 72, 73, 78). Validity disputed. Ratification detail: 1805-01-25 (Senate consent; read from the Stat. margin by V2).
Shapes are approximate and are not legal descriptions of land, title or jurisdiction.