Treaty of St. Louis with the Sauk of Rock River, 1816
The Sauk of Rock River made peace in 1816 and unconditionally confirmed the 1804 St. Louis cession.
- Signed
- May 13, 1816
- Senate
- Ratified
What happened
What happened
On May 13, 1816, commissioners William Clark, Ninian Edwards and Auguste Chouteau signed a treaty of peace and friendship at St. Louis with chiefs and warriors of the Sacs of Rock River and the adjacent country. The preamble starts from the Treaty of Ghent, whose ninth article called on the United States and Britain to end hostilities with Indian tribes and put them on their pre-war footing if they stopped fighting.
The commissioners' version of events, as written in the treaty, is that they invited the Rock River Sacs to meet at Portage des Sioux, but the Sacs "declined that friendly overture" and kept up hostilities and depredations. That, it says, "would have justified the infliction of the severest chastisement." The treaty adds that the Sacs "earnestly repented" and were "imploring mercy." That wording comes from the U.S. side. No Sauk account of the council appears in the sources here.
In Article 1 the Rock River Sacs "unconditionally assent to recognize, re-establish, and confirm" the 1804 Treaty of St. Louis and all other contracts with the Sac nation. In Article 2 the United States agreed to put them back on their pre-war footing if they delivered up plundered property to the officer at Cantonment Davis by July 1. Article 3 said failing to do so would forfeit their share of the 1804 annuities.
Before Knox says many Meskwaki and Sauk, including Black Hawk, considered the 1804 treaty void because it was "signed in the absence of important leaders and without the consent of the Tribal Council."
Good to know. The "under pressure" description rests on the treaty's own threats of punishment and annuity forfeiture; its "repented" and "imploring mercy" language is the U.S. commissioners' framing.
Summarized with AI assistance from 4 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error
What the sources say, and how this was checked
Well supported by the sources below.
which would have justified the infliction of the severest chastisement upon them
Treaty with the Sauk, 1816 (Oklahoma State University Tribal Treaties Database)do hereby unconditionally assent to recognize, re-establish, and confirm the treaty
Treaty with the Sauk, 1816 (Oklahoma State University Tribal Treaties Database)having earnestly repented of their conduct, now imploring mercy
Treaty with the Sauk, 1816 (Oklahoma State University Tribal Treaties Database)was signed in the absence of important leaders and without the consent of the Tribal Council
The Black Hawk War and Treaties (Before Knox)
Research notes. The 'under pressure' label relies on the treaty's own wording about punishment, the July 1 condition and the annuity forfeiture. The 'repented' and 'imploring mercy' language is the U.S. commissioners' framing. No independent account of the 1816 council is cited. Before Knox's account of Black Hawk's objection concerns the 1804 treaty, not this one. No acreage is involved.
What the treaty did to the land
Each shape is a numbered area in the federal government’s 1899 record of land cessions.
earlier terms confirmedabout 16 million acres
Land of the Sauk and Fox in Illinois, Missouri and Wisconsin, ceded 1804 (area 50)
Ceded by the united Sauk and Fox at St. Louis in November 1804; the Sauk, the Fox and the Sauk of Rock River each agreed to and confirmed that treaty in 1815 and 1816.
earlier terms confirmed
Land of the Sauk and Fox in Wisconsin, ceded 1804 (area 51)
Ceded by the Sauk and Fox in the November 1804 treaty, a 2-mile-square tract in Wisconsin for a military post; Sauk and Fox bands confirmed that treaty in 1815 and 1816.
What happened next
Everything the record holds about this land and this treaty, in order: what earlier agreements said, what this one did, and what the United States, the courts and the nations did afterwards.
- 1804
Land lost
About 16 million acres ceded to the United States by the Sauk and Fox
By Treaty of St. Louis with the Sauk and Fox, 1804
- 1815
Land record
Earlier terms confirmed for the land of the Sauk and Fox
By Sauk at Portage des Sioux (1815)
- 1815
Land record
Earlier terms confirmed for the land of the Sauk and Fox
By Fox at Portage des Sioux (1815)
- 1816
This treaty
Earlier terms confirmed for the land of the Sauk and Fox
The Sauk of Rock River made peace in 1816 and unconditionally confirmed the 1804 St. Louis cession.
Who is doing the work today
The nations connected to this treaty come first, then groups returning land and defending treaty rights. Support goes directly to them.
Who is doing the work
This history belongs to living nations. Start with them:
- Sac & Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Iowa
- Sac & Fox Nation of Missouri in Kansas and Nebraska
- Sac & Fox Nation, Oklahoma
Native legal and land defense, nationally
- Native American Rights Fund (NARF) Native-led Litigation and legal advocacy for tribal sovereignty, treaty rights, land and resources Give on their site Website
- NDN Collective (LANDBACK Campaign) Native-led LANDBACK campaign (launched 2020; Mount Rushmore closure and return of Black Hills public lands), Indigenous… Give on their site Website
- Indian Land Tenure Foundation (ILTF) Native-led Land recovery and control by tribes and individual Indian landowners Website
- Decolonizing Wealth Project (Indigenous Earth Fund; California Tribal Land Return) Native-led Reparative philanthropy Give on their site Website
Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.
Sources
Sources
- digitreaties.org/treaties/treaty/83317519reference work
Research notes
Reaffirmation of RIT 43; Black Hawk later contested.
Shapes are approximate and are not legal descriptions of land, title or jurisdiction.