Violation

Fort Laramie 1868 and the Black Hills: abrogation by the Act of Feb. 28, 1877

Not yet reviewed by this nation. What follows comes from public records and research. It does not speak for the nation.

The 1868 Fort Laramie treaty set aside the Black Hills for the Sioux; Congress took them in 1877 without three-fourths consent.

Treaty
Treaty with the Sioux... and Arapaho (Fort Laramie), 15 Stat. 635
Nations
Lakota (Oglala, Sicangu/Brule, Minneconjou, Hunkpapa, Blackfeet, Sans Arc, Two Kettle), Yanktonai, Santee, and Arapaho; Oceti Sakowin
When
1874-1877
Land affected
The Black Hills (Paha Sapa) and the unceded Powder River country; later the lands west of the Missouri redrawn in 1889 (V025).
Acreage
Unceded territory about 33,000,000 acres from 1851 plus about 25,000,000 added (per a secondary summary of Art. 16)

What happened

The Fort Laramie Treaty of 1868 set apart the Great Sioux Reservation, which included the Black Hills, "for the absolute and undisturbed use and occupation" of the Sioux. Article 12 said no cession of reservation land would be valid unless signed by at least three-fourths of adult male Indians. Article 16 said the country north of the North Platte River and east of the Big Horn Mountains "shall be held and considered to be unceded" Indian territory.

In 1874 Lt. Col. George Armstrong Custer led an Army expedition into the Hills, and the discovery of gold was widely reported. The Supreme Court later quoted one historian calling the government's efforts to remove intruders "feeble." In November 1875 the President decided the military should make no further resistance to miners in the Hills. After a commission failed to buy the Hills in 1875, a second commission in 1876 presented an agreement to Sioux chiefs and leading men. The Court wrote that it "was signed by only 10% of the adult male Sioux population." Congress enacted it as the Act of February 28, 1877, which the Court said had the effect of abrogating the treaty. In exchange the Sioux were promised subsistence rations for as long as they would be needed.

In United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians (1980), the Supreme Court held that the 1877 Act was a taking of tribal property that required just compensation. It upheld an award of $17.1 million, the Black Hills' 1877 value, plus interest from 1877. The Encyclopedia of the Great Plains reports that the tribe still refuses the payment and continues to seek the land itself.

Good to know. The Encyclopedia of the Great Plains says the unclaimed award had grown to more than $600 million by the late 1990s.

Summarized with AI assistance from 3 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error

What the sources say, and how this was checked

Well supported by the sources below.

  1. set apart for the absolute and undisturbed use and occupation of the Indians herein namedFort Laramie Treaty, 1868 (Avalon Project, Yale Law School)
  2. It was signed by only 10% of the adult male Sioux population.United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians, 448 U.S. 371 (1980) (Library of Congress, U.S. Reports)
  3. a payment that the tribe still refuses to accept, choosing instead to continue to seek the return of the land itselfUnited States v. Sioux Nation of Indians (Encyclopedia of the Great Plains, University of Nebraska)

Research notes. Fund size: the Notre Dame Law page I opened says over $1 billion; the encyclopedia says over $600 million by the late 1990s; the input's $2 billion (2022) was not verified. The input's '$105 million then' was not found in the Court's text, so omitted. I could not open the input's June 2026 resolutions or the 2026 drilling-permit events at Pe' Sla (sacred-site sensitivity) and omit them. Ratification/proclamation dates and the 1923-1979 litigation chronology are from the input and only partly confirmed by the opinion. The statement that the Hills 'rations' replaced hunting rights is paraphrased from the opinion. The Oceti Sakowin nations' own accounts were not consulted. This entry covers the 1877 Act; the 1889 division is V025.

Treaty or agreementShapes from the 1899 federal record: approximate, not legal boundaries.

Who is doing the work

This history belongs to living nations. Start with them:

Working with these nations

Land return and Native-led work nearby

Native legal and land defense, nationally

Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.

Connections

These links were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.

Nations named 4

Located in 3

Taken to court in 2

Land returns that respond to this 2

Carried out through 1

Policy era 1

Concerns the instrument 1

Sources

  1. pbs.org/newshour/show/why-the-sioux-are-refusing-1-3-billionnews
  2. ictnews.org/news/mining-company-pulls-out-of-controversial-pe-sla-drilling-project/unclassified
  3. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-19/pdf/STATUTE-19-Pg254.pdfprimary record
  4. treaties.okstate.edu/treaties/treaty-with-the-sioux-brule-oglala-miniconjou-yanktonai-hunkreference work
  5. sdpb.org/politics/2026-06-10/south-dakota-tribes-revoice-claim-to-black-hills-through-joinunclassified
  6. supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/448/371/legal text copy
  7. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Rushmorepointer
  8. sdpb.org/arts-life/2022-05-12/united-states-v-sioux-nation-of-indians-the-supreme-court-caunclassified
  9. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Fort_Laramie_(1868)pointer
The record’s fields
What happened
Fort Laramie 1868 and the Black Hills: abrogation by the Act of Feb. 28, 1877 -- Concluded April 29, 1868 (ratified Feb. 16, 1869; proclaimed Feb. 24, 1869). Article 2 set aside the Great Sioux Reservation, including the Black Hills, for 'absolute and undisturbed use and occupation.' Article 12 made any cession of reservation land invalid unless signed by at least three-fourths of all adult male Indians. Article 16 created 'unceded Indian territory' north of the North Platte and east of the Big Horn Mountains. Custer's 1874 expedition and the resulting gold rush brought thousands of non-Indians into the Hills, which the Army did not stop. In 1876 a commission obtained signatures from only about 10% of adult males; Congress enacted that 'agreement' as the Act of Feb. 28, 1877 (19 Stat. 254), which abrogated Article 16, took the Black Hills and the unceded territory, and substituted rations for the Hills and off-reservation hunting rights. In the Court's words, the 1877 Act was a taking of tribal property requiring just compensation.
Legal aftermath
1923 suit under a jurisdictional act; Court of Claims dismissed 1942; Indian Claims Commission (1974, 4-1) held a taking; Court of Claims barred by res judicata 1975; Congress waived the bar 1978; Court of Claims affirmed 1979; Supreme Court (June 30, 1980) affirmed: $17.1 million principal (1877 value) plus 5% interest from 1877, about $105 million then. The award was never accepted. Fund reported over $1 billion by 2011 and about $2 billion by 2022 (journalistic figures; exact current balance not verified). The Lakota position is that the land was never for sale. In June 2026 resolutions from nine South Dakota tribes urged Congress to return federal public lands in the Black Hills. Pe' Sla: a 2026 exploratory drilling permit (Pete Lien & Sons; permit Feb. 27) near Pe' Sla was met by suits, a temporary restraining order, a week-long occupation (Apr. 30) and company withdrawal on about May 8, 2026.
Kind
Violation
Confidence
High
Nation review
Not yet reviewed by this nation
Notes
  • Some details are disputed

Correct this record