Violation

Tuscarora and the Niagara Power Project (1960)

Not yet reviewed by this nation. What follows comes from public records and research. It does not speak for the nation.

The Tuscarora cited the 1794 treaty against a Niagara reservoir; the Court found no treaty applied and let 1,383 acres be taken.

Treaty
Treaty of Canandaigua (1794) invoked; Tuscarora title held in fee
Nations
Tuscarora Nation (Haudenosaunee)
When
1958-1960
Land affected
Tuscarora land taken for the reservoir.
Legal aftermath
Takings upheld with compensation. Shows how the form of title (fee vs. trust) and licensee condemnation authority can defeat treaty arguments.

What happened

The Tuscarora Nation argued that the Treaty of Canandaigua (1794) shielded its land in western New York. In that treaty, Article III promised the Seneca Nation that the United States "will never claim the same, nor disturb" them in the free use of their lands. The Tuscarora had bought their 4,329-acre tract in fee simple from the Holland Land Company in 1804, with help from the Secretary of War.

In Public Law 85-159 (August 21, 1957), Congress directed the Federal Power Commission to license the Niagara hydroelectric project. In January 1958 the Commission licensed the New York Power Authority, and the revised plan for the reservoir included 1,383 acres of Tuscarora land. The Court of Appeals blocked taking that land, but the Supreme Court reversed in 1960. The majority held that the Tuscarora land was not a federal "reservation" under the Federal Power Act, so the Act's extra protections did not apply, and that licensees could condemn Indian-owned land with just compensation. On the treaty argument, the majority said the Canandaigua treaty was with the Seneca, who sold their interest in 1797, so the Tuscarora title was "free of any treaty."

Justice Black, joined by the Chief Justice and Justice Douglas, dissented, arguing the taking breached the government's long-standing protection of Indian homelands. The Court's ruling means this case is a loss of land through eminent domain after a treaty argument was rejected, not a court finding that a treaty was broken.

Good to know. The Court held that no treaty covered the Tuscarora land, so this was a taking where a treaty argument failed, not a ruled treaty violation.

Summarized with AI assistance from 3 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error

What the sources say, and how this was checked

Well supported by the sources below.

  1. its title rests upon that conveyance, free of any treaty.Federal Power Commission v. Tuscarora Indian Nation, 362 U.S. 99 (1960) (Cornell LII)
  2. which included 1,383 acres of the Tuscaroras' lands.Federal Power Commission v. Tuscarora Indian Nation, 362 U.S. 99 (1960), dissent
  3. the United States will never claim the same, nor disturb the Seneka nation, nor any of the Six NationsTreaty with the Six Nations, 1794 (Treaty of Canandaigua), OSU Tribal Treaties Database

Research notes. Important correction: the majority held no treaty covered the Tuscarora land (the 1794 treaty was with the Seneca, who sold their interest in 1797), so this is not an adjudicated treaty violation; the atlas should label it a taking where a treaty argument failed. The input's 'about 1,383 acres' is now verified from the opinion. The input says three Justices dissented (Black, Warren, Douglas) and 'Section 21 of the Act', both consistent with the text. Whether the Federal Power Commission's licensing of the Power Authority counts as 'executive_action' vs Congress's 1957 direction is a judgment call. Compensation amount not found. The Tuscarora's own account was not consulted. The vote count is not given because the opinion shows Justice Brennan concurring in the result and three Justices dissenting.

Treaty or agreementShapes from the 1899 federal record: approximate, not legal boundaries.

Who is doing the work

Working with these nations

Land return and Native-led work nearby

Native legal and land defense, nationally

Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.

Connections

These links were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.

Nations named 2

Taken to court in 1

Located in 1

Policy era 1

Concerns the instrument 1

Sources

  1. supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/362/99/legal text copy
The record’s fields
What happened
Tuscarora and the Niagara Power Project (1960) -- The Federal Power Commission licensed New York's Power Authority to build the Niagara reservoir, which required Tuscarora land. The Supreme Court (Mar. 7, 1960) held that land owned in fee simple by the Nation is not a 'reservation' under the Federal Power Act because the United States holds no interest in it, and that Section 21 of the Act lets licensees condemn Indian-owned land with just compensation; neither 25 U.S.C. 177 nor any treaty barred the taking. Three Justices dissented (Black, Warren, Douglas).
Kind
Violation
Confidence
High
Nation review
Not yet reviewed by this nation
Notes
  • Some details not yet checked against a source
  • Some details unverified

Correct this record