Violation
Oahe Dam and Pick-Sloan: Standing Rock, Cheyenne River, Lower Brule and Crow Creek
Not yet reviewed by this nation. What follows comes from public records and research. It does not speak for the nation.
Oahe Dam flooded Missouri River bottomlands on Sioux reservations; Congress paid the Cheyenne River Tribe under half of what it sought.
- Treaty
- Treaty of Fort Laramie (1868) and Great Sioux Reservation
- Nations
- Standing Rock Sioux, Cheyenne River Sioux, Lower Brule Sioux, Crow Creek Sioux
- When
- 1944-1960s
- Land affected
- Riverbottom forests, towns, agricultural land and the Missouri riparian corridor.
- Acreage
- 104,492 acres (Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe); more than 200,000 acres across Standing Rock and Cheyenne River per Wikipedia
What happened
The 1868 Fort Laramie Treaty set apart the Great Sioux Reservation "for the absolute and undisturbed use and occupation" of the Sioux nations. By the 1950s the reservations that came from it, including Cheyenne River, Standing Rock, Lower Brule and Crow Creek, lay along the Missouri River.
In the Flood Control Act of 1944, Congress approved the Pick-Sloan program of dams on the Missouri. A Senate report says that in 1948 the Army Corps of Engineers took possession of Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe land along the river and began building Oahe Dam. By the time it was dedicated in 1962, four reservation communities were flooded, 104,492 acres of tribal land were inundated, and 181 families (30% of the tribal population) had been forced to relocate. The tribe lost some 90% of its timber, and it received none of the flood control or low-cost power the program was designed to bring. Congress compensated the tribe in 1954. The tribe had requested $23.5 million; the law authorized $10.6 million. On average non-Indians received $49.22 per acre for agricultural land, and the tribe received $21.49.
Later Congresses acknowledged the shortfall and created trust funds: $149.2 million for Fort Berthold and $90.6 million for Standing Rock (1992), $27.5 million for Crow Creek (1996) and $39.3 million for Lower Brule (1997). This is about compensation, not a court finding that the dam breached the 1868 treaty. Public Law 106-511 (November 13, 2000) cites a Comptroller General determination of $290,723,000 as appropriate compensation for the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe's land.
Good to know. No court has held that the dam breached the 1868 treaty; the treaty connection is this page's reading.
Summarized with AI assistance from 3 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error
What the sources say, and how this was checked
Well supported by the sources below.
non-Indians received an average of $49.22 per acre for their agricultural lands, while the Tribe received only $21.49 per acre
Senate Report 106-217, Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe Equitable Compensation Act (GovInfo)the acquisition by the Federal Government of 104,492 acres of land of the Tribe for the Oahe Dam and Reservoir project
Public Law 106-511, Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe Equitable Compensation Act (Congress.gov)set apart for the absolute and undisturbed use and occupation of the Indians herein named
Fort Laramie Treaty, 1868 (Avalon Project, Yale Law School)
Research notes. Correction to input: the Cheyenne River Act was enacted as Public Law 106-511 (Nov. 13, 2000), confirmed on Congress.gov; I cite the Comptroller General's $290,723,000 determination from the Act's findings, not an appropriated sum (the input's $290.7M 'principal' was from the 1999 report). The 'more than 200,000 acres on Standing Rock and Cheyenne River' figure is Wikipedia-only and omitted; Standing Rock, Lower Brule and Crow Creek acreage and communities moved were not verified here, only their trust funds (from the Senate report). The Senate report says the tribe asked for $23.5 million and the law (P.L. 83-776) authorized $10.6 million. The Senate report does not itself cite the 1868 treaty; the link to the treaty's 'undisturbed use' clause is mine, and I found no court holding that the dam breached it. The nations' own accounts were not consulted.
Who is doing the work
This history belongs to living nations. Start with them:
- Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes
- Northern Arapaho Tribe of the Wind River Reservation, Wyoming
- Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe of South Dakota
- Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation, Montana
- Lower Sioux Indian Community in the State of Minnesota
- Prairie Island Indian Community in the State of Minnesota
- Santee Sioux Nation, Nebraska
- Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community of Minnesota
Working with these nations
- Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes Nation government Seeking return of about 6,700 acres at Fort Reno
- Rosebud Sioux Tribe (Sicangu Oyate) Nation government Pe' Sla (1,942 acres, Nov 30, 2012)
- Cheyenne River Youth Project (CRYP) Native-led Youth programs Website
- Right Relationship Boulder (Land Group) Native-led Funds tribal youth camps and gatherings, plant-gathering access, trail content with tribes, pushes for tribal… Give on their site Website
- Owamniyomni Okhodayapi (formerly Friends of the Falls) Native-led Dakota-led restoration and return of care for sacred St. Anthony Falls (Owamniyomni) site in Minneapolis, with… Give on their site Website
- Indian Land Tenure Foundation (ILTF) Native-led Land recovery and control by tribes and individual Indian landowners Website
Land return and Native-led work nearby
- Native Governance Center Native-led Strengthening Native nation governance and capacity to exercise sovereignty Give on their site Website
- Siċaŋġu Co (Sicangu Community Development Corporation; Wolakota Buffalo Range) Native-led Sicangu Lakota economic engine incl. Wolakota Buffalo Range, food sovereignty initiative, local foods Give on their site Website
- Tanka Fund Native-led Returning buffalo to Native American lands, lives and economies via animals, grants and technical assistance to… Give on their site Website
- Thunder Valley Community Development Corporation (Lakota Land Systems) Native-led Lakota-led regenerative community development on Pine Ridge: Lakota Land Systems Give on their site Website
Native legal and land defense, nationally
- Native American Rights Fund (NARF) Native-led Litigation and legal advocacy for tribal sovereignty, treaty rights, land and resources Give on their site Website
- NDN Collective (LANDBACK Campaign) Native-led LANDBACK campaign (launched 2020; Mount Rushmore closure and return of Black Hills public lands), Indigenous… Give on their site Website
- Decolonizing Wealth Project (Indigenous Earth Fund; California Tribal Land Return) Native-led Reparative philanthropy Give on their site Website
- Honor the Earth Native-led Pipeline resistance, sovereignty, energy justice Give on their site Website
Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.
Connections
These links were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.
Nations named 4
Located in 2
Carried out through 1
Policy era 1
Concerns the instrument 1
Sources
The record’s fields
- What happened
- Oahe Dam and Pick-Sloan: Standing Rock, Cheyenne River, Lower Brule and Crow Creek -- Under the Pick-Sloan program, Oahe Dam flooded more than 200,000 acres on the Standing Rock and Cheyenne River reservations (Wikipedia). For the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe alone, Senate Report 106-217 states 104,492 acres of tribal land were acquired, four communities were flooded, 181 families (about 30% of the tribal population) were relocated and about 90% of the tribe's timber was lost. In 1954 the tribe asked for about $23.5 million; Congress authorized $10.6 million, and the report states non-Indian owners received $49.22 per acre against $21.49 for the tribe.
- Legal aftermath
- Later equitable compensation trust funds: Standing Rock $90.6M (Pub. L. 102-575, 1992); Fort Berthold $149.2M (same act); Crow Creek $27.5M (Pub. L. 104-223, 1996); Lower Brule $39.3M (Pub. L. 105-132, 1997); Cheyenne River bill S. 964 recommended in 1999 with $290.7M principal (enactment not confirmed in sources read).
- Kind
- Violation
- Confidence
- High
- Nation review
- Not yet reviewed by this nation
- Notes
- Some details not yet checked against a source
- Some details unverified