Violation
Creek (Muscogee) 1866: punitive cession of the western half of the Nation
Not yet reviewed by this nation. What follows comes from public records and research. It does not speak for the nation.
The 1866 Creek treaty required cession of the nation's western half, citing its 1861 Confederate treaty, at 30 cents an acre.
- Treaty
- Treaty with the Creeks (14 Stat. 785)
- Nations
- Muscogee (Creek) Nation
- When
- 1866
- Land affected
- West half of the Creek domain.
- Acreage
- 3,250,560 acres (per treaty)
What happened
The Creek treaty of June 14, 1866 (14 Stat. 785; ratified July 19, 1866; proclaimed August 11, 1866) was made in Washington with a Creek delegation after the Civil War. Its preamble says the Creeks made a treaty with the "so-called Confederate States" in 1861, which left them "liable to forfeit to the United States all benefits and advantages enjoyed by them in lands, annuities, protection, and immunities." In view of this, it says, "the United States require of the Creeks a portion of their land whereon to settle other Indians."
Article 3 then had the Creeks "cede and convey to the United States" the west half of their entire domain, "estimated to contain three millions two hundred and fifty thousand five hundred and sixty acres," at thirty cents an acre. The land was to be used for other Indians and freedmen as the United States chose. The eastern half, retained by the Creeks, was to "be forever set apart as a home for said Creek Nation." This was a treaty of cession, not a court-found violation. Its preamble gives the Confederate treaty as the reason for taking the land.
In McGirt v. Oklahoma (2020), the Supreme Court noted that the 1866 treaty "reduced the size of the land set aside for the Creek," compensating the Tribe at that price, but that Congress "explicitly restated its commitment" to the remaining land. The Court held that the reservation was never disestablished.
Good to know. The treaty presents the cession as an agreement with Creek delegates; it gives the Creek treaty with the Confederacy as the reason the land was required.
Summarized with AI assistance from 2 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error
What the sources say, and how this was checked
Well supported by the sources below.
the Creeks hereby cede and convey to the United States, to be sold to and used as homes for such other civilized Indians
Treaty with the Creeks, 1866, 14 Stat. 785, Tribal Treaties Databasebe forever set apart as a home for said Creek Nation
McGirt v. Oklahoma, 591 U.S. ___ (2020), Cornell LII
Research notes. "Coercion" is my reading of the preamble, which ties the cession to the 1861 Confederate treaty; the treaty frames it as a negotiated agreement with Creek delegates, who included Southern Creek delegates. Payment of the $975,168 total was not verified as delivered. Parallel 1866 treaties with the Seminole, Cherokee, Choctaw and Chickasaw were not individually read. Muscogee (Creek) Nation's own account was not consulted.
Who is doing the work
This history belongs to living nations. Start with them:
- Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town
- Kialegee Tribal Town
- Poarch Band of Creek Indians
- Thlopthlocco Tribal Town
Native legal and land defense, nationally
- Native American Rights Fund (NARF) Native-led Litigation and legal advocacy for tribal sovereignty, treaty rights, land and resources Give on their site Website
- NDN Collective (LANDBACK Campaign) Native-led LANDBACK campaign (launched 2020; Mount Rushmore closure and return of Black Hills public lands), Indigenous… Give on their site Website
- Indian Land Tenure Foundation (ILTF) Native-led Land recovery and control by tribes and individual Indian landowners Website
- Decolonizing Wealth Project (Indigenous Earth Fund; California Tribal Land Return) Native-led Reparative philanthropy Give on their site Website
Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.
Connections
These links were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.
Taken to court in 1
Nations named 1
Policy era 1
- Reservation1851
Concerns the instrument 1
Sources
- treaties.okstate.edu/treaties/treaty-with-the-creeks-1866-0931reference work
- supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/591/18-9526/legal text copy
The record’s fields
- What happened
- Creek (Muscogee) 1866: punitive cession of the western half of the Nation -- Concluded June 14, 1866; ratified July 19; proclaimed Aug. 11. The preamble recites that the Creek treaty with the Confederate States (1861) left the Nation liable to forfeit benefits under earlier U.S. treaties. Article 3 required the Creeks to cede 'the west half of their entire domain,' estimated at 3,250,560 acres priced at 30 cents per acre ($975,168), to settle other Indians as the U.S. chose. This is a coerced cession imposed as a condition of restored relations (similar terms were imposed on the Seminole, Cherokee, Choctaw and Chickasaw in 1866).
- Legal aftermath
- The remaining Creek land is the territory at issue in McGirt (2020), where the Court read the 1866 treaty as 'forever set apart' land and held the reservation never disestablished (see V047).
- Kind
- Violation
- Confidence
- High
- Nation review
- Not yet reviewed by this nation
- Notes
- Some details not yet checked against a source