Violation

Creek (Muscogee) 1866: punitive cession of the western half of the Nation

Not yet reviewed by this nation. What follows comes from public records and research. It does not speak for the nation.

The 1866 Creek treaty required cession of the nation's western half, citing its 1861 Confederate treaty, at 30 cents an acre.

Treaty
Treaty with the Creeks (14 Stat. 785)
Nations
Muscogee (Creek) Nation
When
1866
Land affected
West half of the Creek domain.
Acreage
3,250,560 acres (per treaty)

What happened

The Creek treaty of June 14, 1866 (14 Stat. 785; ratified July 19, 1866; proclaimed August 11, 1866) was made in Washington with a Creek delegation after the Civil War. Its preamble says the Creeks made a treaty with the "so-called Confederate States" in 1861, which left them "liable to forfeit to the United States all benefits and advantages enjoyed by them in lands, annuities, protection, and immunities." In view of this, it says, "the United States require of the Creeks a portion of their land whereon to settle other Indians."

Article 3 then had the Creeks "cede and convey to the United States" the west half of their entire domain, "estimated to contain three millions two hundred and fifty thousand five hundred and sixty acres," at thirty cents an acre. The land was to be used for other Indians and freedmen as the United States chose. The eastern half, retained by the Creeks, was to "be forever set apart as a home for said Creek Nation." This was a treaty of cession, not a court-found violation. Its preamble gives the Confederate treaty as the reason for taking the land.

In McGirt v. Oklahoma (2020), the Supreme Court noted that the 1866 treaty "reduced the size of the land set aside for the Creek," compensating the Tribe at that price, but that Congress "explicitly restated its commitment" to the remaining land. The Court held that the reservation was never disestablished.

Good to know. The treaty presents the cession as an agreement with Creek delegates; it gives the Creek treaty with the Confederacy as the reason the land was required.

Summarized with AI assistance from 2 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error

What the sources say, and how this was checked

Well supported by the sources below.

  1. the Creeks hereby cede and convey to the United States, to be sold to and used as homes for such other civilized IndiansTreaty with the Creeks, 1866, 14 Stat. 785, Tribal Treaties Database
  2. be forever set apart as a home for said Creek NationMcGirt v. Oklahoma, 591 U.S. ___ (2020), Cornell LII

Research notes. "Coercion" is my reading of the preamble, which ties the cession to the 1861 Confederate treaty; the treaty frames it as a negotiated agreement with Creek delegates, who included Southern Creek delegates. Payment of the $975,168 total was not verified as delivered. Parallel 1866 treaties with the Seminole, Cherokee, Choctaw and Chickasaw were not individually read. Muscogee (Creek) Nation's own account was not consulted.

Treaty or agreementShapes from the 1899 federal record: approximate, not legal boundaries.

Who is doing the work

This history belongs to living nations. Start with them:

Native legal and land defense, nationally

Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.

Connections

These links were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.

Taken to court in 1

Nations named 1

Policy era 1

Concerns the instrument 1

Sources

  1. treaties.okstate.edu/treaties/treaty-with-the-creeks-1866-0931reference work
  2. supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/591/18-9526/legal text copy
The record’s fields
What happened
Creek (Muscogee) 1866: punitive cession of the western half of the Nation -- Concluded June 14, 1866; ratified July 19; proclaimed Aug. 11. The preamble recites that the Creek treaty with the Confederate States (1861) left the Nation liable to forfeit benefits under earlier U.S. treaties. Article 3 required the Creeks to cede 'the west half of their entire domain,' estimated at 3,250,560 acres priced at 30 cents per acre ($975,168), to settle other Indians as the U.S. chose. This is a coerced cession imposed as a condition of restored relations (similar terms were imposed on the Seminole, Cherokee, Choctaw and Chickasaw in 1866).
Legal aftermath
The remaining Creek land is the territory at issue in McGirt (2020), where the Court read the 1866 treaty as 'forever set apart' land and held the reservation never disestablished (see V047).
Kind
Violation
Confidence
High
Nation review
Not yet reviewed by this nation
Notes
  • Some details not yet checked against a source

Correct this record