Violation

Georgia ignores Worcester v. Georgia (1832): the federal government declines to enforce

Not yet reviewed by this nation. What follows comes from public records and research. It does not speak for the nation.

The Supreme Court held in 1832 that Georgia's laws had no force in Cherokee territory; President Jackson did not enforce the ruling.

Treaty
Treaties of Hopewell (1785) and Holston (1791) as read in Worcester
Nations
Cherokee
When
1832-1838
Land affected
Practical protection of the Cherokee Nation's territorial integrity; precondition for the New Echota minority treaty (V006) and removal.
Acreage
n/a

What happened

Georgia passed laws extending its authority over the Cherokee Nation's territory and declaring Cherokee laws "null and void." Samuel Worcester, a missionary living there, was convicted under those laws and sentenced to four years of hard labor. He argued that treaties between the United States and the Cherokee recognized the nation's right to govern its territory, and that the Constitution makes treaties part of the supreme law of the land.

In Worcester v. Georgia (1832), the Supreme Court held that "the Cherokee nation, then, is a distinct community occupying its own territory," in which "the laws of Georgia can have no force." It called the Georgia act "void" and said the judgment against Worcester should be reversed. The New Georgia Encyclopedia reports that Georgia ignored the ruling and refused to release the missionaries. It says President Jackson "did not enforce the decision against the state," and instead urged the Cherokees to relocate or fall under Georgia's jurisdiction. That source says Jackson's widely quoted line about Marshall enforcing his decision does not match his actual words to a general.

In 1835 a dissident faction signed the New Echota treaty, and in 1838 the Army forcibly gathered almost all Cherokees and marched them to Indian Territory. In Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta (2022), the Court said the view in Worcester "has yielded to closer analysis."

Good to know. Jackson's widely quoted line about Marshall enforcing his own decision does not match what he actually wrote.

Summarized with AI assistance from 3 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error

What the sources say, and how this was checked

Well supported by the sources below.

  1. The Cherokee nation, then, is a distinct community occupying its own territoryWorcester v. Georgia, 31 U.S. (6 Pet.) 515 (1832), Cornell LII
  2. President Jackson did not enforce the decision against the stateWorcester v. Georgia (1832), New Georgia Encyclopedia
  3. has yielded to closer analysisOklahoma v. Castro-Huerta, 597 U.S. ___ (2022), Cornell LII

Research notes. Input dates for Georgia's laws (1828-30) and gold near Dahlonega in 1828 were not confirmed in sources I opened and are omitted. The Georgia Encyclopedia gives Jackson's actual words to Gen. Coffee ("fell still born"), not the famous line. Castro-Huerta (2022) held concurrent state jurisdiction over non-Indian crimes against Indians; "narrowed" is the input's characterization, the opinion says the Worcester view "has yielded."

Treaty or agreementShapes from the 1899 federal record: approximate, not legal boundaries.

Who is doing the work

This history belongs to living nations. Start with them:

Native legal and land defense, nationally

Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.

Connections

These links were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.

Taken to court in 2

Concerns the instrument 2

Nations named 1

Policy era 1

Sources

  1. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherokee_removalpointer
  2. supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/597/21-429/legal text copy
  3. supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/31/515/legal text copy
The record’s fields
What happened
Georgia ignores Worcester v. Georgia (1832): the federal government declines to enforce -- After Georgia extended its laws over the Cherokee Nation (1828-30, following the discovery of gold near Dahlonega in 1828), the Supreme Court held in Worcester (Mar. 3, 1832) that Georgia's laws had no force in Cherokee territory and that missionary Samuel Worcester's conviction was void. The executive branch did not enforce the decision. The remark attributed to Andrew Jackson ('John Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it') is probably apocryphal.
Legal aftermath
Worcester remains good law on the point that states lack authority in Indian country absent federal consent, but its force was narrowed in Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta (2022); see V048.
Kind
Violation
Confidence
High
Nation review
Not yet reviewed by this nation
Notes
  • Some details not yet checked against a source

Correct this record