Court case
Worcester v. Georgia
In 1832 the Court held Georgia's laws had no force in the Cherokee Nation and reversed the missionary Samuel Worcester's conviction.
- Citation
- 31 U.S. (6 Pet.) 515 (1832)
- Court
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Year
- 1832
- Nations
- Cherokee Nation
- Treaty at issue
- Treaties of Hopewell (1785) and Holston (1791)
- Effect on land rights
- advanced
What happened
Samuel A. Worcester, a citizen of Vermont, entered the Cherokee Nation as a missionary. He said he had the authority of the president of the United States and the permission and approval of the Cherokee Nation. A Georgia court indicted him for residing, on July 15, 1831, in the part of the Cherokee Nation that Georgia had attached to Gwinnett County, without a state license and without taking an oath to support Georgia's constitution and laws.
He pleaded that Georgia could not prosecute him. He cited several treaties in which the United States acknowledged the Cherokee Nation as a sovereign nation and guaranteed the territory it occupied. He said the Georgia laws were repugnant to those treaties, to the Constitution, and to the federal Trade and Intercourse Act. The Gwinnett court overruled his plea, convicted him, and sentenced him to hard labour in the penitentiary for four years.
In the January 1832 term, Chief Justice Marshall wrote for the Supreme Court. The Court said the "right given by discovery among the European discoverers" could not "affect the rights of those already in possession." It pointed to the treaties of Hopewell and Holston, which recognized the Cherokees' national character and right of self-government.
"The Cherokee nation, then, is a distinct community, occupying its own territory," Marshall wrote, "in which the laws of Georgia can have no force." The Court held Worcester's sentence was pronounced under a law that is void and ought to be reversed and annulled.
Summarized with AI assistance from 3 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error
What the sources say, and how this was checked
Well supported by the sources below.
in which the laws of Georgia can have no force, and which the citizens of Georgia have no right to enter
Worcester v. Georgia, 31 U.S. (6 Pet.) 515 (1832) (U.S. Reports, Library of Congress)could not affect the rights of those already in possession, either as aboriginal occupants
Worcester v. Georgia, 31 U.S. (6 Pet.) 515 (1832) (U.S. Reports, Library of Congress)sentenced "to hard labour in the penitentiary for four years."
Worcester v. Georgia, 31 U.S. (6 Pet.) 515 (1832) (U.S. Reports, Library of Congress)
Research notes. The atlas page notes that Georgia and President Jackson did not enforce the judgment, and the old text mentioned the 1835 Treaty of New Echota; neither is in the opened opinion and both were removed. The reporter text has OCR errors, so quotes are taken from legible passages. Treaties of Hopewell and Holston are named in the opinion.
Who is doing the work
This history belongs to living nations. Start with them:
Native legal and land defense, nationally
- Native American Rights Fund (NARF) Native-led Litigation and legal advocacy for tribal sovereignty, treaty rights, land and resources Give on their site Website
- NDN Collective (LANDBACK Campaign) Native-led LANDBACK campaign (launched 2020; Mount Rushmore closure and return of Black Hills public lands), Indigenous… Give on their site Website
- Indian Land Tenure Foundation (ILTF) Native-led Land recovery and control by tribes and individual Indian landowners Website
- Decolonizing Wealth Project (Indigenous Earth Fund; California Tribal Land Return) Native-led Reparative philanthropy Give on their site Website
Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.
Connections
Links marked “suggested” were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.
Doctrine applied 4
Decided a dispute over 3
Concerns the instrument 2
- Treaty of Hopewell with the Cherokee, 17851785suggested
- Treaty of Holston with the Cherokee, 17911791suggested
Policy era 1
- Removal1830suggested
Nations named 1
- Cherokeesuggested
Sources
- supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/31/515/legal text copy
The record’s fields
- Holding
- Georgia's law requiring non-Indians to obtain a state license to reside in Cherokee territory was void; the Cherokee Nation is a distinct political community whose relations are governed exclusively by the federal government. Georgia and President Jackson did not enforce the judgment.not yet checked against a source
- Kind
- Court case
- Confidence
- High
- Notes
- Some details not yet checked against a source