Reconstruction Treaty with the Choctaw and Chickasaw, 1866
In 1866 the Choctaw and Chickasaw ceded the leased district west of the 98th meridian for $300,000, held in trust until freedmen won citizenship.
- Signed
- April 28, 1866
- Senate
- Ratified
- Land given up
- about 7.7 million acres
- Promises
- 0 of 1 broken or only partly kept
What happened
What happened
On April 28, 1866, in Washington, U.S. commissioners Dennis N. Cooley, Elijah Sells and Ely S. Parker signed a treaty with commissioners of the Choctaw and Chickasaw Nations. The nations agreed that slavery and involuntary servitude would never again exist among them, except as punishment for crime.
In Article 3 they ceded to the United States "the territory west of the 98° west longitude, known as the leased district." The United States agreed to pay $300,000, but to hold it in trust at not less than five percent interest. The money would be released once the nations' legislatures passed laws giving formerly enslaved people of African descent, and their descendants, the rights of citizens, including suffrage, and forty acres each. If no such laws came within two years of ratification, the money would be held for those freedpeople whom the United States removed from the nations.
The treaty also allowed the United States to settle up to ten thousand "Kansas Indians" in the two nations, with the same rights as Choctaws and Chickasaws. It also made a general amnesty for past offenses against U.S. laws. The Department of the Interior reports that the Five Tribes' 1866 treaties treated freedmen differently. The sources here do not describe whether the Choctaw and Chickasaw legislatures passed the laws, or either nation's own account.
What was promised, and what happened
- Not known
Hold $300,000 in trust until the nations give freedpeople citizenship rights and forty acres each. (Art. 3)
which the United States was to hold in trust until the Choctaw and Chickasaw Nations enacted
doi.gov
Good to know. The treaty text does not describe this cession as a penalty for any Confederate alliance.
Summarized with AI assistance from 4 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error
What the sources say, and how this was checked
Well supported by the sources below.
in consideration of the sum of three hundred thousand dollars, hereby cede to the United States the territory west of the 98
Tribal Treaties Database (Oklahoma State University): Treaty with the Choctaw and Chickasaw, 1866neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, otherwise than in punishment of crime whereof the parties shall have been duly convicted
Tribal Treaties Database (Oklahoma State University): Treaty with the Choctaw and Chickasaw, 1866Choctaw and Chickasaw Nations ceded certain lands in exchange for the sum of $300,000
U.S. Department of the Interior: Oklahoma Tribes Reconstruction TreatiesThe Freedmen provisions in each of the 1866 treaties differed in important respects.
U.S. Department of the Interior: Oklahoma Tribes Reconstruction Treaties
Research notes. The treaty text does not say the cession was a penalty for any Confederate alliance (unlike the Seminole and Creek preambles), so none is claimed. The sources cited here do not show whether the trust money was paid or the freedmen provisions carried out. The treaty itself uses 'leased district' and states no acreage.
What the treaty did to the land
About 7.7 million acres given up. Each shape is a numbered area in the federal government’s 1899 record of land cessions.
ceded to the United Statesabout 7.7 million acres
Land of the Chickasaw and Choctaw in Oklahoma, ceded 1866 (area 485)
Leased by the Choctaw and Chickasaw in 1855, their country west of the 98th meridian, for settling other tribes; they ceded this 'leased district' in the 1866 treaty.
What happened next
Everything the record holds about this land and this treaty, in order: what earlier agreements said, what this one did, and what the United States, the courts and the nations did afterwards.
- 1855
Land record
About 7.7 million acres named in the record
By Choctaw and Chickasaw at Washington, DC (1855)
- 1866
This treaty
About 7.7 million acres ceded to the United States by the Chickasaw and Choctaw
In 1866 the Choctaw and Chickasaw ceded the leased district west of the 98th meridian for $300,000, held in trust until freedmen won citizenship.
- 1898
Law
Curtis Act
The 1898 Curtis Act abolished tribal courts in Indian Territory and ordered the Dawes Commission to allot Five Tribes land.
- 1898
Promise broken
Curtis Act (1898) and Oklahoma statehood (1907): Five Tribes governments dismantled and lands allotted
The 1898 Curtis Act let allotment of Five Tribes land proceed without tribal consent and weakened their governments.
- 2020
In court
McGirt v. Oklahoma
Land promised to the Creek Nation by treaty remains a reservation, so Oklahoma could not prosecute a tribal member there.
The law behind it
The legal ideas behind the decisions, and related records without a date. Court cases and laws with a date are in what happened next, above.
Legal doctrine
canons of construction
Courts read ambiguous treaties in favor of tribes and as the Indians would have understood them, rules the Supreme Court has repeated for more than a century.
Legal doctrine
criminal jurisdiction
Who may prosecute a crime in Indian country depends on who the offender and victim are and where it happened.
Legal doctrine
diminishment
Only Congress can shrink a reservation, and courts require a clear statement; Solem, Hagen and Parker show how that test works.
Legal doctrine
disestablishment
Disestablishment means Congress ended a reservation entirely; courts require clear intent from Congress, and McGirt (2020) held the Creek Reservation was never disestablished.
Legal doctrine
indian country
Federal law defines 'Indian country' as reservations, dependent Indian communities and Indian allotments; the definition decides which government's laws apply.
Who is doing the work today
The nations connected to this treaty come first, then groups returning land and defending treaty rights. Support goes directly to them.
Who is doing the work
This history belongs to living nations. Start with them:
Native legal and land defense, nationally
- Native American Rights Fund (NARF) Native-led Litigation and legal advocacy for tribal sovereignty, treaty rights, land and resources Give on their site Website
- NDN Collective (LANDBACK Campaign) Native-led LANDBACK campaign (launched 2020; Mount Rushmore closure and return of Black Hills public lands), Indigenous… Give on their site Website
- Indian Land Tenure Foundation (ILTF) Native-led Land recovery and control by tribes and individual Indian landowners Website
- Decolonizing Wealth Project (Indigenous Earth Fund; California Tribal Land Return) Native-led Reparative philanthropy Give on their site Website
Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.
Sources
Sources
- digitreaties.org/treaties/treaty/179008966reference work
Research notes
Stat. page per Stat. vol. 14 OCR index; Kappler page.
Shapes are approximate and are not legal descriptions of land, title or jurisdiction.