Reconstruction Treaty with the Seminole, 1866
In 1866 the Seminole Nation ceded its whole domain at fifteen cents an acre and took 200,000 acres of Creek land at fifty cents.
- Signed
- March 21, 1866
- Senate
- Ratified
- Land given up
- about 800,000 acres
- Land set aside for the nations
- about 250,000 acres
- Promises
- 1 of 1 broken or only partly kept
What happened
What happened
On March 21, 1866, in Washington, the Seminole Nation signed a new treaty with U.S. commissioners D. N. Cooley, Elijah Sells and Ely S. Parker. The preamble says the Seminoles had made a treaty with the "so-called Confederate States" on August 1, 1861. That treaty, it says, "incurred the liability of forfeiture of all lands and other property held by grant or gift of the United States." A treaty of peace was made at Fort Smith in 1865, in which the Seminoles revoked the Confederate treaty.
In Article 3, "in compliance with the desire of the United States to locate other Indians and freedmen thereon," the Seminoles ceded their entire domain, estimated at 2,169,080 acres. The United States agreed to pay $325,362, at fifteen cents an acre. The United States had obtained the western half of the Creek Nation's lands, and granted the Seminoles 200,000 acres of it. The Seminoles were to pay fifty cents an acre, or $100,000, deducted from the payment. Article 2 gave persons of African descent among the Seminoles the rights of native citizens.
The Interior Department's testimony on the Five Tribes' Reconstruction treaties says the freedmen provisions differed in each. In Seminole Nation v. United States (1942) the Supreme Court noted that for 1867 to 1874 the United States paid only $16,902.80 of the $20,000 appropriated under Article 3's school fund. It said the Nation's right to the $3,097.20 deficiency was undisputed.
What was promised, and what happened
- Partly kept
Establish a $50,000 school fund and pay five percent interest ($2,500 a year) for schools. (Art. 3)
During the period from 1867 to 1874 the Government only partially discharged this annual obligation
law.cornell.edu
Summarized with AI assistance from 5 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error
What the sources say, and how this was checked
Well supported by the sources below.
thereby incurred the liability of forfeiture of all lands and other property held by grant or gift of the United States
Tribal Treaties Database (Oklahoma State University): Treaty with the Seminole, 1866the Seminoles cede and convey to the United States their entire domain
Tribal Treaties Database (Oklahoma State University): Treaty with the Seminole, 1866said purchase being at the rate of fifteen cents per acre
Tribal Treaties Database (Oklahoma State University): Treaty with the Seminole, 1866The Freedmen provisions in each of the 1866 treaties differed in important respects.
U.S. Department of the Interior: Oklahoma Tribes Reconstruction Treatiesa $50,000 trust fund for the Seminole Nation and to pay thereon annual interest of 5% ($2,500) for the support of schools
Seminole Nation v. United States, 316 U.S. 286 (1942)
Research notes. No Seminole Nation source is cited, so the Nation's own account is not described. The Supreme Court's 1942 opinion covers several claims; only the Article 3 school-fund claim is described here, and the Court left the Nation entitled only to the small deficiency in that item, disallowing the rest of it.
What the treaty did to the land
About 800,000 acres given up. about 250,000 acres recognized, kept or set aside for the nations. Each shape is a numbered area in the federal government’s 1899 record of land cessions.
ceded to the United Statesabout 800,000 acres
Land of the Seminole in Oklahoma, ceded 1866 (area 480)
Given by the Creek to the Seminole in 1856, then ceded by the Seminole to the United States in the March 1866 treaty.
set aside as a reservationabout 250,000 acres
Reservation of the Seminole in Oklahoma (area 481)
Granted to the Seminole in 1866 as a reserve from the western half of the Creek lands in Indian Territory; not a cession by them.
What happened next
Everything the record holds about this land and this treaty, in order: what earlier agreements said, what this one did, and what the United States, the courts and the nations did afterwards.
- 1856
Land kept
About 800,000 acres set aside as a reservation for the Seminole
By Creeks and Seminole at Washington, DC (1856)
- 1866
This treaty
About 800,000 acres ceded to the United States by the Seminole. About 250,000 acres set aside as a reservation for the Seminole
In 1866 the Seminole Nation ceded its whole domain at fifteen cents an acre and took 200,000 acres of Creek land at fifty cents.
- 1870
Promise broken
Seminole Nation v. United States (1942): annuities paid to corrupt officials despite treaty duties
The Seminole Nation said treaty money was paid to corrupt tribal officers; in 1942 the Court held the U.S. to the most exacting fiduciary standards.
- 1898
Law
Curtis Act
The 1898 Curtis Act abolished tribal courts in Indian Territory and ordered the Dawes Commission to allot Five Tribes land.
- 1898
Promise broken
Curtis Act (1898) and Oklahoma statehood (1907): Five Tribes governments dismantled and lands allotted
The 1898 Curtis Act let allotment of Five Tribes land proceed without tribal consent and weakened their governments.
- 1942
In court
Seminole Nation v. United States
In 1942 the Supreme Court said the United States must be judged by "the most exacting fiduciary standards" when it handles Indian treaty money.
- 1985
In court
United States v. Dann
In 1985 the Court held that depositing a $26 million claims award in a Treasury account for the Shoshone Tribe counted as "payment."
- 2020
In court
McGirt v. Oklahoma
Land promised to the Creek Nation by treaty remains a reservation, so Oklahoma could not prosecute a tribal member there.
The law behind it
The legal ideas behind the decisions, and related records without a date. Court cases and laws with a date are in what happened next, above.
Legal doctrine
claims
The 1946 Indian Claims Commission let tribes press land and treaty claims against the United States for money, as in the Sioux case.
Legal doctrine
trust doctrine
The 1831 'ward and guardian' description became a trust relationship that courts enforce for damages mainly where a statute or regulation creates the duty.
Legal doctrine
aboriginal title
Aboriginal title is Native nations' right to land held before European arrival; unrecognized title can be ended without payment.
Legal doctrine
federal recognition
Federal recognition acknowledges a tribe's political existence; Congress, Interior or a court can grant it, and only Congress can end it.
Legal doctrine
canons of construction
Courts read ambiguous treaties in favor of tribes and as the Indians would have understood them, rules the Supreme Court has repeated for more than a century.
Legal doctrine
criminal jurisdiction
Who may prosecute a crime in Indian country depends on who the offender and victim are and where it happened.
Legal doctrine
diminishment
Only Congress can shrink a reservation, and courts require a clear statement; Solem, Hagen and Parker show how that test works.
Legal doctrine
disestablishment
Disestablishment means Congress ended a reservation entirely; courts require clear intent from Congress, and McGirt (2020) held the Creek Reservation was never disestablished.
Legal doctrine
indian country
Federal law defines 'Indian country' as reservations, dependent Indian communities and Indian allotments; the definition decides which government's laws apply.
Who is doing the work today
The nations connected to this treaty come first, then groups returning land and defending treaty rights. Support goes directly to them.
Who is doing the work
This history belongs to living nations. Start with them:
Native legal and land defense, nationally
- Native American Rights Fund (NARF) Native-led Litigation and legal advocacy for tribal sovereignty, treaty rights, land and resources Give on their site Website
- NDN Collective (LANDBACK Campaign) Native-led LANDBACK campaign (launched 2020; Mount Rushmore closure and return of Black Hills public lands), Indigenous… Give on their site Website
- Indian Land Tenure Foundation (ILTF) Native-led Land recovery and control by tribes and individual Indian landowners Website
- Decolonizing Wealth Project (Indigenous Earth Fund; California Tribal Land Return) Native-led Reparative philanthropy Give on their site Website
Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.
Sources
Sources
- digitreaties.org/treaties/treaty/178931070reference work
Research notes
Stat. page per Stat. vol. 14 OCR index; Kappler page. Reconstruction treaties penalised tribes that allied with the Confederacy (see UNL Confederate treaties of 1861).
Shapes are approximate and are not legal descriptions of land, title or jurisdiction.