Treaty with the Yankton Sioux, 1858
In 1858 the Yankton Sioux ceded more than 11 million acres of eastern South Dakota and kept a 400,000-acre reservation.
- Signed
- April 19, 1858
- Senate
- Ratified February 16, 1859
- Land given up
- about 12 million acres
- Land set aside for the nations
- about 447,000 acres
What happened
What happened
On April 19, 1858, in Washington, Commissioner Charles E. Mix signed a treaty with chiefs and delegates of the Yankton Sioux. They ceded "all the lands now owned, possessed, or claimed by them, wherever situated, except four hundred thousand acres." The Supreme Court describes this as renouncing a claim to more than 11 million acres of aboriginal lands. The reserve lay on the Missouri River in what is now Charles Mix County.
The National Park Service says Struck-by-the-Ree, the Yankton leader, told his people after returning from Washington: "The white men are coming in like maggots. It is useless to resist them." The Park Service gives about 11.5 million acres in exchange for approximately $1.6 million in annuities over 50 years and a 475,000-acre reservation.
The Senate ratified the treaty on February 16, 1859, per the Park Service. Under the 1887 Dawes Act individual members received allotments and the government negotiated for the surplus. In South Dakota v. Yankton Sioux Tribe (1998) the Supreme Court held that Congress intended its 1894 Act to diminish the reservation, so a landfill site was not Indian country.
Good to know. Figures differ: the treaty reserves 400,000 acres and the Supreme Court says more than 11 million acres were given up; the National Park Service gives about 11.5 million and 475,000.
Summarized with AI assistance from 3 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error
What the sources say, and how this was checked
Supported by the sources below; some details rest on one source.
In 1858, the Yanktons entered into a treaty with the United States renouncing their claim to more than 11 million acres of their aboriginal lands
South Dakota v. Yankton Sioux Tribe, 522 U.S. 329 (1998), Legal Information InstituteThe white men are coming in like maggots. It is useless to resist them.
Yankton Sioux Treaty Monument, National Park Servicewe hold that Congress intended to diminish the Yankton Reservation
South Dakota v. Yankton Sioux Tribe, 522 U.S. 329 (1998), Legal Information Institute
Research notes. Acreage differs by source: the Supreme Court says more than 11 million acres were renounced, with 400,000 acres retained; the National Park Service says about 11.5 million acres and a 475,000-acre reservation. The monument inscription quoted on the Park Service page gives the date as April 18, 1856, but the treaty was signed April 19, 1858. The quotation from Struck-by-the-Ree is as the Park Service reports it. The 1998 case is about the 1894 Act, not the 1858 treaty itself.
What the treaty did to the land
About 12 million acres given up. about 447,000 acres recognized, kept or set aside for the nations. Each shape is a numbered area in the federal government’s 1899 record of land cessions.
ceded to the United Statesabout 12 million acres
Land of the Yankton Sioux in South Dakota, ceded 1858 (area 410)
Ceded by the Yankton Sioux in 1858, all their claim to land in South Dakota, including islands in the Missouri River, except a 400,000-acre reserve.
set aside as a reservationabout 447,000 acres
Land of the Yankton Sioux in South Dakota, ceded 1894 (area 411)
Kept by the Yankton Sioux as a 400,000-acre reserve on the Missouri River in 1858; the unallotted land was ceded in a December 1892 agreement that Congress confirmed in 1894.
set aside as a reservation
Reservation of the Yankton Sioux in Minnesota (area 412)
Kept for the Yankton Sioux's use as the Red Pipestone quarry in Minnesota by the 1858 treaty; not a cession.
What happened next
Everything the record holds about this land and this treaty, in order: what earlier agreements said, what this one did, and what the United States, the courts and the nations did afterwards.
- 1858
This treaty
About 12 million acres ceded to the United States by the Yankton Sioux. About 447,000 acres set aside as a reservation for the Yankton Sioux
In 1858 the Yankton Sioux ceded more than 11 million acres of eastern South Dakota and kept a 400,000-acre reservation.
- 1859
This treaty
Ratified by the Senate
- 1894
Land lost
About 447,000 acres ceded to the United States by the Yankton Sioux
The 1899 record: “Confirms agreement with these Indians made Dec. 31, 1892, by which they cede to the U. S. all their title and interest in all the unallotted lands in their reservation”
- 1998
In court
South Dakota v. Yankton Sioux Tribe
In 1998 a unanimous Court held that an 1894 act ratifying the Yankton Sioux cession diminished the 1858 reservation.
The law behind it
The legal ideas behind the decisions, and related records without a date. Court cases and laws with a date are in what happened next, above.
Legal doctrine
diminishment
Only Congress can shrink a reservation, and courts require a clear statement; Solem, Hagen and Parker show how that test works.
Legal doctrine
disestablishment
Disestablishment means Congress ended a reservation entirely; courts require clear intent from Congress, and McGirt (2020) held the Creek Reservation was never disestablished.
Legal doctrine
indian country
Federal law defines 'Indian country' as reservations, dependent Indian communities and Indian allotments; the definition decides which government's laws apply.
Who is doing the work today
The nations connected to this treaty come first, then groups returning land and defending treaty rights. Support goes directly to them.
Who is doing the work
This history belongs to living nations. Start with them:
- Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe
- Crow Creek Sioux Tribe
- Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe of South Dakota
- Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation, Montana
- Lower Brule Sioux Tribe
- Lower Sioux Indian Community in the State of Minnesota
- Oglala Sioux Tribe
- Prairie Island Indian Community in the State of Minnesota
Working with these nations
- Rosebud Sioux Tribe (Sicangu Oyate) Nation government Pe' Sla (1,942 acres, Nov 30, 2012)
- Indian Land Tenure Foundation (ILTF) Native-led Land recovery and control by tribes and individual Indian landowners Website
- Lakota People's Law Project (program of Sacred Defense Fund) Native-led Legal advocacy Give on their site Website
- NDN Collective (LANDBACK Campaign) Native-led LANDBACK campaign (launched 2020; Mount Rushmore closure and return of Black Hills public lands), Indigenous… Give on their site Website
- Cheyenne River Youth Project (CRYP) Native-led Youth programs Website
- Thunder Valley Community Development Corporation (Lakota Land Systems) Native-led Lakota-led regenerative community development on Pine Ridge: Lakota Land Systems Give on their site Website
Native legal and land defense, nationally
- Native American Rights Fund (NARF) Native-led Litigation and legal advocacy for tribal sovereignty, treaty rights, land and resources Give on their site Website
- Decolonizing Wealth Project (Indigenous Earth Fund; California Tribal Land Return) Native-led Reparative philanthropy Give on their site Website
- Honor the Earth Native-led Pipeline resistance, sovereignty, energy justice Give on their site Website
- Indian Law Resource Center Native-led Legal assistance to Indigenous nations to protect lands, resources, treaty and human rights Give on their site Website
Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.
Sources
Sources
- digitreaties.org/treaties/treaty/178710468reference work
- nps.gov/mnrr/learn/historyculture/yankton-sioux-treaty-monument.htmreference work
The US Senate ratified the treaty on February 16, 1859
Corrections to this record
- date ratified was listed as “”; corrected from nps.gov
The US Senate ratified the treaty on February 16, 1859
Research notes
Acreage figures (, not entered); Kappler page.
Shapes are approximate and are not legal descriptions of land, title or jurisdiction.