Creeks at Creek Agency (1827)
In 1827 the Creeks ceded their remaining Georgia land, after the President urged them to extend the 1826 lines, for $27,491 and $15,000.
- Signed
- November 15, 1827
- Senate
- Ratified
- Land given up
- about 256,000 acres
What happened
What happened
On November 15, 1827, Thomas L. McKenney and John Crowell signed articles of agreement at the Creek Agency. They signed for the United States, with Little Prince and other chiefs and head men of the Creek Nation.
The preamble looks back to the Treaty of Washington of January 24, 1826. That treaty was meant to cede all Creek land inside Georgia's chartered limits. It "having been since ascertained" that its lines, and a supplementary article, did not cover all of it, and "the President of the United States having urged the Creek Nation further to extend the limits," the chiefs, "being desirous of complying with the wish of the President," ceded "all the remaining lands now owned or claimed by the Creek Nation" within Georgia's chartered limits.
In return the United States agreed to pay $27,491 once the agreement was approved and ratified and had also been sanctioned by a council of the Creek Nation, or by added signatures of chiefs "as shall constitute it the act of the Creek Nation." It also agreed to allow $15,000 more, of which $5,000 was for the education and support of Creek children at a school in Kentucky.
The Statutes at Large record a proclamation on March 4, 1828. The agreement does not state how many acres were involved.
Summarized with AI assistance from 3 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error
What the sources say, and how this was checked
Supported by the sources below; some details rest on one source.
the President of the United States having urged the Creek Nation further to extend the limits
Tribal Treaties Database (OSU)as shall constitute it the act of the Creek Nation
Tribal Treaties Database (OSU)Thomas L. McKenney
Statutes at Large, vol. 7 (GovInfo)
Research notes. The agreement says the President "urged" the extension; the sources cited describe no further pressure. Acreage is not stated.
What the treaty did to the land
About 256,000 acres given up. Each shape is a numbered area in the federal government’s 1899 record of land cessions.
ceded to the United Statesabout 256,000 acres
Land of the Creek in Georgia, ceded 1827 (area 141)
Ceded by the Creek in November 1827, giving up all their remaining land in Georgia.
What happened next
Everything the record holds about this land and this treaty, in order: what earlier agreements said, what this one did, and what the United States, the courts and the nations did afterwards.
Who is doing the work today
The nations connected to this treaty come first, then groups returning land and defending treaty rights. Support goes directly to them.
Who is doing the work
This history belongs to living nations. Start with them:
- Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town
- Kialegee Tribal Town
- Muscogee (Creek) Nation
- Poarch Band of Creek Indians
- Thlopthlocco Tribal Town
Native legal and land defense, nationally
- Native American Rights Fund (NARF) Native-led Litigation and legal advocacy for tribal sovereignty, treaty rights, land and resources Give on their site Website
- NDN Collective (LANDBACK Campaign) Native-led LANDBACK campaign (launched 2020; Mount Rushmore closure and return of Black Hills public lands), Indigenous… Give on their site Website
- Indian Land Tenure Foundation (ILTF) Native-led Land recovery and control by tribes and individual Indian landowners Website
- Decolonizing Wealth Project (Indigenous Earth Fund; California Tribal Land Return) Native-led Reparative philanthropy Give on their site Website
Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.
Sources
Sources
- treaties.okstate.edu/treaties/treaty-with-the-creeks-1827-0284reference work
Nov. 15, 1827. | 7 Stat., 307. / scan: 284 TREATY WITH THE CREEKS, 1827.
Shapes are approximate and are not legal descriptions of land, title or jurisdiction.