All treaties and agreements

SoutheastTreaty

Treaty of Indian Springs (1825) with the Creeks (McIntosh treaty)

The 1825 Indian Springs treaty ceded all Creek land in Georgia and part of Alabama; an 1826 treaty declared it null and void.

Signed
February 12, 1825
Senate
Ratified
Promises
0 of 1 broken or only partly kept

What happened

What happened

On February 12, 1825, commissioners Duncan G. Campbell and James Meriwether signed a convention at Indian Springs with "the Chiefs of the Creek Nation." The preamble says the commissioners told the Creeks it was U.S. policy that tribes inside states should move west of the Mississippi. It says the chiefs of the Creek towns agreed, "those of Tokaubatchee excepted."

The Creeks ceded all their lands in Georgia and a large area north and west of a line in Alabama. The United States offered the same amount of land "acre for acre" on the Arkansas River, and $400,000 for losses and the costs of removal.

The Encyclopedia of Alabama gives a darker account. It says the Creek National Council had refused to sell more land and had made ceding land punishable by death. It says the commissioners then turned to William McIntosh, who "had accepted bribes in the past," and that he and two others were killed on April 30, 1825. A large majority of chiefs and warriors objected that McIntosh lacked authority.

In 1826 a new treaty in Washington said the great majority of chiefs had protested that the Indian Springs treaty was signed by "persons having no sufficient authority." Article 1 declared it "null and void." The Creeks did not, however, get their territory back; the new treaty ceded Georgia land of its own.

What was promised, and what happened

  • Not known

    Land west of the Mississippi on the Arkansas River, acre for acre, in exchange for the ceded land. (Art. 2)

    is hereby declared to be null and void, to every intent and purpose whatsoever govinfo.gov

Good to know. The claim that about half the $400,000 would go to McIntosh and his friends, and the three million acre Alabama figure, come from the Encyclopedia of Alabama, not the treaty.

Summarized with AI assistance from 4 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error

What the sources say, and how this was checked

Well supported by the sources below.

  1. those of Tokaubatchee exceptedStatutes at Large, vol. 7 (GovInfo)
  2. is hereby declared to be null and void, to every intent and purpose whatsoeverStatutes at Large, vol. 7 (GovInfo)
  3. He had accepted bribes in the past, and the commissioners found him disposed to do so again.Treaty of Indian Springs (1825), Encyclopedia of Alabama
  4. A large majority of chiefs and warriors objected that McIntosh did not have sufficient authority to sign treaties or cede territoryTreaty of Indian Springs (1825), Encyclopedia of Alabama

Research notes. The Encyclopedia of Alabama gives April 30, 1825 for the killings and says about half the $400,000 would go to McIntosh and his friends; the treaty text does not say this. The Encyclopedia says three million acres in Alabama; the treaty gives boundaries only. The 1826 treaty's own ceded land and payments are not detailed here.

What happened next

Everything the record holds about this land and this treaty, in order: what earlier agreements said, what this one did, and what the United States, the courts and the nations did afterwards.

Who is doing the work today

The nations connected to this treaty come first, then groups returning land and defending treaty rights. Support goes directly to them.

Who is doing the work

This history belongs to living nations. Start with them:

Native legal and land defense, nationally

Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.

Sources

Sources

  1. digitreaties.org/treaties/treaty/121122213reference work
Research notes

Annulled/superseded by the Treaty of Washington of 1826-01-24 (RIT 144) after Creek National Council protest. Example of a Senate-ratified treaty later abrogated by treaty.

Shapes are approximate and are not legal descriptions of land, title or jurisdiction.