All treaties and agreements

Great Lakes / Old NorthwestTreaty

Treaty of Fort Harmar with the Wyandot and allied nations, 1789

At Fort Harmar in 1789 several nations renewed the Fort McIntosh boundary after Governor St. Clair reportedly threatened to attack them.

Signed
January 9, 1789
Senate
Ratified
Promises
1 of 1 broken or only partly kept

What happened

What happened

Arthur St. Clair, governor of the Northwest Territory, called leaders of the Wyandot, Delaware, Ottawa, Chippewa, Potawatomi and Sauk nations to Fort Harmar. Richland Source says the council began December 13, 1788. It says the nations hoped for a reservation west of the Muskingum River and north of the Ohio, but St. Clair refused and demanded the boundary set at Fort McIntosh in 1785. The article says he "told the American Indians he would attack them if they refused," and also sought their friendship with $3,000 in presents.

The treaty was dated January 9, 1789 and proclaimed September 27, 1789 (7 Stat. 28). The nations agreed to "renew and confirm" the Fort McIntosh boundary "to the end that the same may remain as a division line" between the lands of the United States and those of the nations "forever." They released and ceded "all the land east, south and west of the lines above described, so far as the said Indians formerly claimed the same." The text records goods valued at six thousand dollars delivered at the treaty, and two Wyandot hostages held until prisoners were returned.

Richland Source says many of Ohio's American Indians, including the Shawnee, refused to honor the treaty, claiming that the groups at the negotiations did not speak for them, and that warfare increased. The Treaty of Greenville, signed on August 3, 1795, had the Shawnee, Wyandot, Delaware, Miami and other nations agree to move to the northwestern corner of present-day Ohio.

What was promised, and what happened

  • Broken

    The Fort McIntosh boundary would remain the dividing line between the nations and the United States forever. (Art. II)

    agreed to move to the northwestern corner of what is present-day Ohio richlandsource.com

Good to know. Figures differ: a news feature says $3,000 in presents, while the treaty records goods worth $6,000; they may be different payments. St. Clair's threat is reported only by that news feature.

Summarized with AI assistance from 4 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error

What the sources say, and how this was checked

Supported by the sources below; some details rest on one source.

  1. do by these presents renew and confirm the said boundary lineTribal Treaties Database: Treaty of Fort Harmar with the Wyandot and allied nations, 1789 (Oklahoma State University Libraries)
  2. so far as the said Indians formerly claimed the sameTribal Treaties Database: Treaty of Fort Harmar with the Wyandot and allied nations, 1789 (Oklahoma State University Libraries)
  3. St. Clair told the American Indians he would attack them if they refused to abide by the Treaty of Fort McIntosh.Ohio's sporadic Indian wars stretched into the 18th century - Richland Source
  4. They claimed that the groups represented at the treaty negotiations did not speak for them.Ohio's sporadic Indian wars stretched into the 18th century - Richland Source

Research notes. Richland Source is a news feature, not a scholarly source; its account of St. Clair's threat is not checked against another source. It gives $3,000 in presents, while the treaty text records goods worth six thousand dollars; the two may describe different payments. The text proclaims the treaty September 27, 1789.

What happened next

Everything the record holds about this land and this treaty, in order: what earlier agreements said, what this one did, and what the United States, the courts and the nations did afterwards.

Who is doing the work today

The nations connected to this treaty come first, then groups returning land and defending treaty rights. Support goes directly to them.

Who is doing the work

This history belongs to living nations. Start with them:

Working with these nations

Native legal and land defense, nationally

Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.

Sources

Sources

  1. digitreaties.org/treaties/treaty/183374851reference work
Research notes

Concluded under Confederation authority just before the new government took office; Senate handling of Fort Harmar is in. Western Confederacy rejected the settlement, leading to the Northwest Indian War.

Shapes are approximate and are not legal descriptions of land, title or jurisdiction.