Treaty of Fort Harmar with the Wyandot and allied nations, 1789
At Fort Harmar in 1789 several nations renewed the Fort McIntosh boundary after Governor St. Clair reportedly threatened to attack them.
- Signed
- January 9, 1789
- Senate
- Ratified
- Promises
- 1 of 1 broken or only partly kept
What happened
What happened
Arthur St. Clair, governor of the Northwest Territory, called leaders of the Wyandot, Delaware, Ottawa, Chippewa, Potawatomi and Sauk nations to Fort Harmar. Richland Source says the council began December 13, 1788. It says the nations hoped for a reservation west of the Muskingum River and north of the Ohio, but St. Clair refused and demanded the boundary set at Fort McIntosh in 1785. The article says he "told the American Indians he would attack them if they refused," and also sought their friendship with $3,000 in presents.
The treaty was dated January 9, 1789 and proclaimed September 27, 1789 (7 Stat. 28). The nations agreed to "renew and confirm" the Fort McIntosh boundary "to the end that the same may remain as a division line" between the lands of the United States and those of the nations "forever." They released and ceded "all the land east, south and west of the lines above described, so far as the said Indians formerly claimed the same." The text records goods valued at six thousand dollars delivered at the treaty, and two Wyandot hostages held until prisoners were returned.
Richland Source says many of Ohio's American Indians, including the Shawnee, refused to honor the treaty, claiming that the groups at the negotiations did not speak for them, and that warfare increased. The Treaty of Greenville, signed on August 3, 1795, had the Shawnee, Wyandot, Delaware, Miami and other nations agree to move to the northwestern corner of present-day Ohio.
What was promised, and what happened
- Broken
The Fort McIntosh boundary would remain the dividing line between the nations and the United States forever. (Art. II)
agreed to move to the northwestern corner of what is present-day Ohio
richlandsource.com
Good to know. Figures differ: a news feature says $3,000 in presents, while the treaty records goods worth $6,000; they may be different payments. St. Clair's threat is reported only by that news feature.
Summarized with AI assistance from 4 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error
What the sources say, and how this was checked
Supported by the sources below; some details rest on one source.
do by these presents renew and confirm the said boundary line
Tribal Treaties Database: Treaty of Fort Harmar with the Wyandot and allied nations, 1789 (Oklahoma State University Libraries)so far as the said Indians formerly claimed the same
Tribal Treaties Database: Treaty of Fort Harmar with the Wyandot and allied nations, 1789 (Oklahoma State University Libraries)St. Clair told the American Indians he would attack them if they refused to abide by the Treaty of Fort McIntosh.
Ohio's sporadic Indian wars stretched into the 18th century - Richland SourceThey claimed that the groups represented at the treaty negotiations did not speak for them.
Ohio's sporadic Indian wars stretched into the 18th century - Richland Source
Research notes. Richland Source is a news feature, not a scholarly source; its account of St. Clair's threat is not checked against another source. It gives $3,000 in presents, while the treaty text records goods worth six thousand dollars; the two may describe different payments. The text proclaims the treaty September 27, 1789.
What happened next
Everything the record holds about this land and this treaty, in order: what earlier agreements said, what this one did, and what the United States, the courts and the nations did afterwards.
Who is doing the work today
The nations connected to this treaty come first, then groups returning land and defending treaty rights. Support goes directly to them.
Who is doing the work
This history belongs to living nations. Start with them:
- Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians of the Bad River Reservation, Wisconsin
- Bay Mills Indian Community
- Chippewa Cree Indians of the Rocky Boy's Reservation, Montana
- Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians, Michigan
- Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin
- Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa
- Lac Vieux Desert Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of Michigan
- Little Shell Tribe of Chippewa Indians of Montana
Working with these nations
- Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife Commission (GLIFWC) Nation government Ojibwe treaty rights in ceded territories, natural resource stewardship, manoomin, and a Land Conservancy program… Give on their site Website
- Stockbridge-Munsee Community (Band of Mohican Indians) Nation government 372 acres on Monument Mountain's north slope (finalized Apr 2025; $2.5M, $2.26M state grant)
- Honor the Earth Native-led Pipeline resistance, sovereignty, energy justice Give on their site Website
- White Earth Land Recovery Project (WELRP) Native-led Recover the original White Earth reservation land base Give on their site Website
- Native Land Conservancy (Massachusetts) Native-led Native-led land conservation Give on their site Website
Native legal and land defense, nationally
- Native American Rights Fund (NARF) Native-led Litigation and legal advocacy for tribal sovereignty, treaty rights, land and resources Give on their site Website
- NDN Collective (LANDBACK Campaign) Native-led LANDBACK campaign (launched 2020; Mount Rushmore closure and return of Black Hills public lands), Indigenous… Give on their site Website
- Indian Land Tenure Foundation (ILTF) Native-led Land recovery and control by tribes and individual Indian landowners Website
- Decolonizing Wealth Project (Indigenous Earth Fund; California Tribal Land Return) Native-led Reparative philanthropy Give on their site Website
Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.
Sources
Sources
- digitreaties.org/treaties/treaty/183374851reference work
Research notes
Concluded under Confederation authority just before the new government took office; Senate handling of Fort Harmar is in. Western Confederacy rejected the settlement, leading to the Northwest Indian War.
Shapes are approximate and are not legal descriptions of land, title or jurisdiction.