Statute
Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA)
NAGPRA, signed November 16, 1990, made museums and federal agencies inventory Native remains and return them to descendants and tribes.
- Citation
- Pub. L. 101-601, 104 Stat. 3048 (Nov. 16, 1990); 25 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.; regulations at 43 C.F.R. part 10
- Year
- 1990
- Effect on land rights
- advanced
What happened
The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, Public Law 101-601, approved November 16, 1990, required federal agencies and museums across the country to give Native ancestors and cultural items back. A 1989 law had already required this of the Smithsonian Institution. The National Park Service, which helps administer it, says Congress acknowledged that human remains and other cultural items removed from Federal or tribal lands "belong, in the first instance, to lineal descendants, Indian Tribes, and Native Hawaiian organizations."
The Act sets a priority order for ownership of Native American cultural items excavated or discovered on federal or tribal lands after the Act's date. Human remains and associated funerary objects go first to lineal descendants. If none can be found, they go to the tribe on whose tribal land they were discovered, or to the tribe with the closest cultural affiliation that states a claim.
It also created duties for institutions. Each federal agency and museum holding Native American human remains and associated funerary objects must compile an inventory and, to the extent possible, identify the items' geographical and cultural affiliation. Those inventories had to be done in consultation with tribal officials, within five years of the Act. When cultural affiliation is shown, the agency or museum "shall expeditiously return" the remains and objects on request.
Return depends on a request: the agency or museum acts when a lineal descendant, tribe or Native Hawaiian organization asks and cultural affiliation is shown.
Summarized with AI assistance from 5 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error
What the sources say, and how this was checked
Well supported by the sources below.
To provide for the protection of Native American graves, and for other purposes.
Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, Pub. L. 101-601, 104 Stat. 3048 (Nov. 16, 1990)belong, in the first instance, to lineal descendants, Indian Tribes, and Native Hawaiian organizations
Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, National Park Servicein the case of Native American human remains and associated funerary objects , in the lineal descendants of the Native American
25 U.S.C. 3002, Ownership, Cornell LIIshall compile an inventory of such items and, to the extent possible based on information possessed by such museum or Federal agency
25 U.S.C. 3003, Inventory for human remains and associated funerary objects, Cornell LIIshall expeditiously return such remains and associated funerary objects.
25 U.S.C. 3005, Repatriation, Cornell LII
Research notes. The 2023 regulations (a separate record) changed how the Act is implemented. This story does not describe enforcement results or the number of items returned, because no source opened gives them. Exceptions, the definition of 'museum', and civil penalties were not examined.
Who is doing the work
Native legal and land defense, nationally
- Native American Rights Fund (NARF) Native-led Litigation and legal advocacy for tribal sovereignty, treaty rights, land and resources Give on their site Website
- NDN Collective (LANDBACK Campaign) Native-led LANDBACK campaign (launched 2020; Mount Rushmore closure and return of Black Hills public lands), Indigenous… Give on their site Website
- Indian Land Tenure Foundation (ILTF) Native-led Land recovery and control by tribes and individual Indian landowners Website
- Decolonizing Wealth Project (Indigenous Earth Fund; California Tribal Land Return) Native-led Reparative philanthropy Give on their site Website
Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.
Connections
Links marked “suggested” were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.
Doctrine applied 3
Policy era 1
- Self-Governance1988suggested
Sources
- Kind
- Statute
- Confidence
- High