Statute
Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA)
The 1988 Indian Gaming Regulatory Act set federal rules for tribal gaming on 'Indian lands' and required state compacts for casino-style games.
- Citation
- Pub. L. 100-497, 102 Stat. 2467 (Oct. 17, 1988); 25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.
- Year
- 1988
- Effect on land rights
- advanced
What happened
The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, was signed October 17, 1988. Its findings give Congress's reasons. They say "numerous Indian tribes have become engaged in or have licensed gaming activities on Indian lands as a means of generating tribal governmental revenue," that "existing Federal law does not provide clear standards or regulations for the conduct of gaming on Indian lands," and that "a principal goal of Federal Indian policy is to promote tribal economic development, tribal self-sufficiency, and strong tribal government."
The purposes section says the Act provides a statutory basis for tribal gaming, for regulation "adequate to shield it from organized crime and other corrupting influences," and for a National Indian Gaming Commission.
Land is central, because the Act applies only on "Indian lands." The definition covers all lands within the limits of any Indian reservation, and lands held in trust by the United States, or held by a tribe or individual subject to a federal restriction against alienation, "over which an Indian tribe exercises governmental power."
For the biggest casino-style games, Class III, Section 2710(d) says they are lawful on Indian lands only if the tribe's ordinance is approved by the Chairman of the Commission, the State permits such gaming for any purpose by any person, and the games are run under a Tribal-State compact in effect.
Summarized with AI assistance from 4 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error
What the sources say, and how this was checked
Well supported by the sources below.
existing Federal law does not provide clear standards or regulations for the conduct of gaming on Indian lands
25 U.S. Code sec. 2701 (IGRA findings), Cornell LIIadequate to shield it from organized crime and other corrupting influences
25 U.S. Code sec. 2702 (IGRA purposes), Cornell LIIover which an Indian tribe exercises governmental power
25 U.S. Code sec. 2703 (definitions), Cornell LIIconducted in conformance with a Tribal-State compact entered into by the Indian tribe and the State
25 U.S. Code sec. 2710 (tribal gaming ordinances), Cornell LII
Research notes. The old record tied the Act to litigation over trust-land definitions (Carcieri, Bay Mills); no source opened here covers those cases, so they are left out. The Statutes at Large page was fetched but quotes come from the current U.S. Code. Gaming revenue figures and tribal views were not reviewed.
Who is doing the work
Native legal and land defense, nationally
- Native American Rights Fund (NARF) Native-led Litigation and legal advocacy for tribal sovereignty, treaty rights, land and resources Give on their site Website
- NDN Collective (LANDBACK Campaign) Native-led LANDBACK campaign (launched 2020; Mount Rushmore closure and return of Black Hills public lands), Indigenous… Give on their site Website
- Indian Land Tenure Foundation (ILTF) Native-led Land recovery and control by tribes and individual Indian landowners Website
- Decolonizing Wealth Project (Indigenous Earth Fund; California Tribal Land Return) Native-led Reparative philanthropy Give on their site Website
Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.
Connections
Links marked “suggested” were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.
Doctrine applied 3
Policy era 1
- Self-Governance1988suggested
Responds to 1
- California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians1987suggested
Sources
- Kind
- Statute
- Confidence
- High