Statute

Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA)

The 1988 Indian Gaming Regulatory Act set federal rules for tribal gaming on 'Indian lands' and required state compacts for casino-style games.

Citation
Pub. L. 100-497, 102 Stat. 2467 (Oct. 17, 1988); 25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.
Year
1988
Effect on land rights
advanced

What happened

The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, was signed October 17, 1988. Its findings give Congress's reasons. They say "numerous Indian tribes have become engaged in or have licensed gaming activities on Indian lands as a means of generating tribal governmental revenue," that "existing Federal law does not provide clear standards or regulations for the conduct of gaming on Indian lands," and that "a principal goal of Federal Indian policy is to promote tribal economic development, tribal self-sufficiency, and strong tribal government."

The purposes section says the Act provides a statutory basis for tribal gaming, for regulation "adequate to shield it from organized crime and other corrupting influences," and for a National Indian Gaming Commission.

Land is central, because the Act applies only on "Indian lands." The definition covers all lands within the limits of any Indian reservation, and lands held in trust by the United States, or held by a tribe or individual subject to a federal restriction against alienation, "over which an Indian tribe exercises governmental power."

For the biggest casino-style games, Class III, Section 2710(d) says they are lawful on Indian lands only if the tribe's ordinance is approved by the Chairman of the Commission, the State permits such gaming for any purpose by any person, and the games are run under a Tribal-State compact in effect.

Summarized with AI assistance from 4 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error

What the sources say, and how this was checked

Well supported by the sources below.

  1. existing Federal law does not provide clear standards or regulations for the conduct of gaming on Indian lands25 U.S. Code sec. 2701 (IGRA findings), Cornell LII
  2. adequate to shield it from organized crime and other corrupting influences25 U.S. Code sec. 2702 (IGRA purposes), Cornell LII
  3. over which an Indian tribe exercises governmental power25 U.S. Code sec. 2703 (definitions), Cornell LII
  4. conducted in conformance with a Tribal-State compact entered into by the Indian tribe and the State25 U.S. Code sec. 2710 (tribal gaming ordinances), Cornell LII

Research notes. The old record tied the Act to litigation over trust-land definitions (Carcieri, Bay Mills); no source opened here covers those cases, so they are left out. The Statutes at Large page was fetched but quotes come from the current U.S. Code. Gaming revenue figures and tribal views were not reviewed.

Who is doing the work

Native legal and land defense, nationally

Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.

Connections

Links marked “suggested” were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.

Doctrine applied 3

Policy era 1

Responds to 1

Sources

  1. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Gaming_Regulatory_Actpointer
Kind
Statute
Confidence
High

Correct this record