Violation
Act of March 2, 1889: the Great Sioux Reservation divided and about 9 million acres opened
Not yet reviewed by this nation. What follows comes from public records and research. It does not speak for the nation.
The Act of March 2, 1889 split the Great Sioux Reservation into smaller ones and opened about half the remainder to settlers.
- Treaty
- Treaty of Fort Laramie (1868), Art. 12
- Nations
- Lakota and Dakota bands of the Great Sioux Reservation
- When
- 1889
- Land affected
- About half of what remained of the Great Sioux Reservation.
- Acreage
- about 9 million acres (secondary)
- Legal aftermath
- The Sioux Nation case (1980) addressed the 1877 taking, not the 1889 cession. Diminishment of individual reservations was later litigated (V031, V033).
What happened
The 1868 Fort Laramie treaty set aside the Great Sioux Reservation, which the Supreme Court describes as some 25 million acres. Article 12 said no later cession was valid unless signed by "at least three-fourths of all the adult male Indians occupying or interested in the same."
In 1877 Congress had already removed the Black Hills, about 7.5 million acres by the Court's count (the Act of February 28, 1877). The Act of March 2, 1889 then divided what remained into six smaller reservations. According to the Court, approximately one-half of the remaining reservation was "restored to the public domain." The Act set the price homesteaders would pay the United States for opened land at $1.25 per acre in the first three years, falling to 75 cents and then 50 cents. Section 28 said the Act would take effect only on the Sioux bands' acceptance in the manner required by Article 12 of the 1868 treaty.
In a 1977 footnote, the Supreme Court stated that this change in reservation status "was agreed to by three-fourths of the adult male Indians on the Great Sioux Reservation." So, unlike the 1877 Act, the 1889 Act is described by the Court as meeting the treaty's consent rule. This is context for a statutory division of the reservation. The Court cited a Senate document for that count.
Good to know. Unlike the 1877 taking of the Black Hills, the Supreme Court says the 1889 Act had the three-fourths consent the treaty required.
Summarized with AI assistance from 3 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error
What the sources say, and how this was checked
Well supported by the sources below.
unless executed and signed by at least three-fourths of all the adult male Indians occupying or interested in the same
Fort Laramie Treaty, 1868, Article XII (Avalon Project, Yale Law School)This termination of Reservation status was agreed to by three-fourths of the adult male Indians on the Great Sioux Reservation
Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. Kneip, 430 U.S. 584 (1977) (Library of Congress, U.S. Reports)sum of one dollar and twenty-five cents per acre for all lands disposed of within the first three years
Act of March 2, 1889, 25 Stat. 888 (Statutes at Large, via GovTrack)
Research notes. Disagreement with input: the input says the three-fourths threshold in 1889 is contested; the Supreme Court (Kneip, n.5) says the 1889 change was agreed to by three-fourths, and I found no source disputing it, so I report the Court's statement only. I could not confirm the input's 'about 9 million acres opened'; the Court says only 'approximately one-half' of the remaining reservation was restored to the public domain. The Act's section numbers were read from OCR text (the input cites Sec. 16, 21, 28; I saw 28 and the price terms). Section 28's wording is paraphrased. The figures 25 million and 7.5 million acres are the Court's. The Lakota and Dakota nations' views of the 1889 consent were not found. The input says the 1889 Act made five reservations; the Court says six separate reservations were carved out (sections 1-6).
Who is doing the work
This history belongs to living nations. Start with them:
- Crow Creek Sioux Tribe
- Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe of South Dakota
- Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation, Montana
- Lower Sioux Indian Community in the State of Minnesota
- Prairie Island Indian Community in the State of Minnesota
- Santee Sioux Nation, Nebraska
- Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community of Minnesota
- Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate
Working with these nations
- Rosebud Sioux Tribe (Sicangu Oyate) Nation government Pe' Sla (1,942 acres, Nov 30, 2012)
- Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes Nation government Seeking return of about 6,700 acres at Fort Reno
- Owamniyomni Okhodayapi (formerly Friends of the Falls) Native-led Dakota-led restoration and return of care for sacred St. Anthony Falls (Owamniyomni) site in Minneapolis, with… Give on their site Website
- Cheyenne River Youth Project (CRYP) Native-led Youth programs Website
- Siċaŋġu Co (Sicangu Community Development Corporation; Wolakota Buffalo Range) Native-led Sicangu Lakota economic engine incl. Wolakota Buffalo Range, food sovereignty initiative, local foods Give on their site Website
- Thunder Valley Community Development Corporation (Lakota Land Systems) Native-led Lakota-led regenerative community development on Pine Ridge: Lakota Land Systems Give on their site Website
Native legal and land defense, nationally
- Native American Rights Fund (NARF) Native-led Litigation and legal advocacy for tribal sovereignty, treaty rights, land and resources Give on their site Website
- NDN Collective (LANDBACK Campaign) Native-led LANDBACK campaign (launched 2020; Mount Rushmore closure and return of Black Hills public lands), Indigenous… Give on their site Website
- Indian Land Tenure Foundation (ILTF) Native-led Land recovery and control by tribes and individual Indian landowners Website
- Decolonizing Wealth Project (Indigenous Earth Fund; California Tribal Land Return) Native-led Reparative philanthropy Give on their site Website
Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.
Connections
These links were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.
Nations named 3
Taken to court in 2
Policy era 1
Concerns the instrument 1
Sources
The record’s fields
- What happened
- Act of March 2, 1889: the Great Sioux Reservation divided and about 9 million acres opened -- The Act of Mar. 2, 1889 (25 Stat. 888) divided the remaining Great Sioux Reservation into five smaller reservations (Standing Rock, Cheyenne River, Lower Brule, Rosebud, Pine Ridge), released Indian title to land outside them (Sec. 16), returned the remainder to the public domain for settlers at $1.25, $0.75 and $0.50 per acre (Sec. 21), and made the Act effective only upon acceptance and consent by the Sioux bands 'as prescribed by the twelfth article' of the 1868 treaty (Sec. 28). Whether the Article 12 three-fourths threshold was genuinely met is contested in the historical record; not resolved in sources read.
- Kind
- Violation
- Confidence
- Medium
- Nation review
- Not yet reviewed by this nation
- Notes
- Some details are disputed
- Some details unverified