Violation
Treaty of Buffalo Creek (1838): sale of Seneca reservations and the 1842 and 1857 corrections
Not yet reviewed by this nation. What follows comes from public records and research. It does not speak for the nation.
The 1838 Buffalo Creek treaty tied removal to the sale of Seneca reservations; the sale was never carried out at Tonawanda, and later treaties reworked it.
- Treaty
- Treaty of Buffalo Creek (1838); Treaty with the Seneca (1842); Treaty with the Tonawanda Band (1857)
- Nations
- Seneca Nation (Seneca Nation of Indians) and Tonawanda Band of Seneca; other New York nations
- When
- 1838-1842
- Land affected
- Buffalo Creek reservation (and, until 1857, most of Tonawanda). Allegany and Cattaraugus retained.
What happened
The Treaty of Buffalo Creek (Jan. 15, 1838; 7 Stat. 550) was made between commissioner Ransom H. Gillet and "the chiefs, head men and warriors of the several tribes of New York Indians." The tribes gave up their Green Bay lands and the United States set aside land in Indian Territory as a "future home" for the Senecas, Onondagas, Cayugas, Tuscaroras, Oneidas, St. Regis, Stockbridges, Munsees and Brothertowns. The treaty also recites that Thomas L. Ogden and Joseph Fellows, assignees of Massachusetts, had bought Seneca claims to certain lands, with the price given as two hundred and two thousand dollars.
The Seneca sale covered four New York reservations, the 1842 treaty says: Buffalo Creek, Cattaraugus, Allegany and Tonawanda. That treaty records "divers questions and differences" over the sale. It let the Seneca Nation keep the Cattaraugus and Allegany reservations, and granted Buffalo Creek and Tonawanda to Ogden and Fellows. The 1857 Tonawanda Band treaty says that "for divers reasons and differences" the earlier treaties "remain unexecuted" for Tonawanda. In it the band gave up its claims to western land and removal, the United States agreed to pay $256,000, and the band was allowed to buy back its reservation from Ogden and Fellows.
This is context about a sale that the government itself later said was never carried out at Tonawanda, not a court ruling. The database lists the Tonawanda Band of Seneca, Seneca Nation of Indians and Seneca-Cayuga Nation as successors.
Summarized with AI assistance from 3 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error
What the sources say, and how this was checked
Well supported by the sources below.
a future home for the following tribes, to wit: The Senecas, Onondagas, Cayugas, Tuscaroras, Oneidas, St. Regis, Stockbridges, Munsees, and Brothertowns
Treaty with the New York Indians, 1838 (Buffalo Creek), 7 Stat. 550, Tribal Treaties Databasedivers questions and differences having arisen between the chiefs and headmen of the Seneca nation of Indians
Treaty with the Seneca, 1842, 7 Stat. 586, Tribal Treaties Databasethe said treaties remain unexecuted as to the said Tonawanda reservation, and the band of Senecas residing thereon
Treaty with the Seneca, Tonawanda Band, 1857, 11 Stat. 735, Tribal Treaties Database
Research notes. Not confirmed in sources read: that Tonawanda chiefs were not consulted or did not sign, bribery or forged consent, the Quaker role, and the Senate margin; all are omitted. The 1838 treaty text says the new home was in "Indian Territory" west of the Missouri; the input said Kansas Territory. Input said the 1838 treaty covered four Seneca reservations; the 1842 text confirms the sale covered four (Buffalo Creek, Cattaraugus, Allegany, Tonawanda).
Who is doing the work
This history belongs to living nations. Start with them:
Working with these nations
- Oneida Indian Nation Nation government About 18,000 acres in trust (2022 est.), 25,000-acre cap under 2013 agreement
- Rematriation Native-led Indigenous women-led media, education, community advocacy Give on their site Website
- The Nature Conservancy (TNC) Allied land trust Funder/partner in several tribal land returns Website
Land return and Native-led work nearby
- Shinnecock Kelp Farmers Native-led Indigenous kelp farming and Shinnecock Bay restoration Give on their site Website
Native legal and land defense, nationally
- Native American Rights Fund (NARF) Native-led Litigation and legal advocacy for tribal sovereignty, treaty rights, land and resources Give on their site Website
- NDN Collective (LANDBACK Campaign) Native-led LANDBACK campaign (launched 2020; Mount Rushmore closure and return of Black Hills public lands), Indigenous… Give on their site Website
- Indian Land Tenure Foundation (ILTF) Native-led Land recovery and control by tribes and individual Indian landowners Website
- Decolonizing Wealth Project (Indigenous Earth Fund; California Tribal Land Return) Native-led Reparative philanthropy Give on their site Website
Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.
Connections
These links were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.
Nations named 3
Concerns the instrument 2
Located in 1
Policy era 1
- Removal1830
Sources
The record’s fields
- What happened
- Treaty of Buffalo Creek (1838): sale of Seneca reservations and the 1842 and 1857 corrections -- The Jan. 15, 1838 treaty, signed by the U.S. and nine New York nations as part of the removal program, acknowledged that the Ogden Land Company would buy the four remaining Seneca reservations in New York, with proceeds to fund removal to Kansas Territory. The Tonawanda Seneca said they were not consulted and that their chiefs did not sign; they refused to leave. A 1842 treaty modified the 1838 agreement: the Ogden Company had bought only two reservations (including Tonawanda), and the Seneca kept Cattaraugus and Allegany. In 1857 the Tonawanda Band's separate treaty let it use its share of the earlier sale to repurchase most of its reservation.
- Legal aftermath
- Corrected only by new treaties (1842, 1857). Widely reported allegations of bribery and forged consent, and the Senate's narrow ratification margin, were not confirmed in sources read.
- Kind
- Violation
- Confidence
- Medium
- Nation review
- Not yet reviewed by this nation
- Notes
- Some details not yet checked against a source
- Some details unverified