All treaties and agreements

CaliforniaNever ratified

California Treaty A: Camp Belt, King's River, 1851 (unratified)

At Camp Belt in 1851, twelve tribes agreed to a King's River district and gave up other land claims; the Senate never ratified it.

Signed
May 13, 1851
Senate
Never ratified
Land set aside for the nations
about 369,000 acres
The land in this treaty’s record. Open on the map

The Senate never ratified this treaty, so under U.S. law it never took effect, even when the government acted on it.

What happened

What happened

On May 13, 1851, at Camp Belt on King's River, commissioner George W. Barbour signed a treaty of peace and friendship with the chiefs, captains and head men of twelve tribes, among them the Ta-ches, Cah-wai, Yo-kol and Ta-lum-ne. Article 3 set apart a district between the Cah-wai River and the Chou-chille River, running down to Tulare or Tache Lake and King's River. It was to be held forever for the tribes' sole use and occupancy. In return the tribes would "forever quit claim" to the government to all other lands to which they had ever had any claim or title. They could still hunt and gather in the hills between the two rivers.

Article 4 promised 600 head of beef cattle and 500 sacks of flour for each of 1851 and 1852. Article 5 promised, after ratification, brood mares, cows, ploughs, work oxen, tools, seeds, blankets and cloth. Article 6 promised a farmer, a blacksmith, a wood worker, teachers and a school-house. The United States kept the right to build military posts.

None of it took effect. It was one of 18 treaties made in California in 1851 and 1852. The National Archives' Prologue magazine says the senators found the commissioners' appointments irregular, were unsure whether Mexico had recognized native land title, and heard strong objections from white Californians. The Senate "rejected the treaties and, following Senate rules, imposed an injunction of secrecy on them." With the treaties rejected, Indian title was left unresolved. Prologue adds that Indians of California later sought compensation for lands taken without payment in a case before the Indian Claims Commission. It reports that "the case was decided in favor of the Indians."

Good to know. Sources give July 2 or July 8, 1852 as the date the Senate rejected it.

Summarized with AI assistance from 4 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error

What the sources say, and how this was checked

Well supported by the sources below.

  1. a district of country between the Cah-wai river, or the first of the four creeks, and the Chou-chille riverTribal Treaties Database (Oklahoma State University): Treaty with the Taches, Cah-wai, etc., 1851
  2. the said tribes hereby forever quit claim to the government of the United States to any and all landsTribal Treaties Database (Oklahoma State University): Treaty with the Taches, Cah-wai, etc., 1851
  3. the Senate rejected the treaties and, following Senate rules, imposed an injunction of secrecy on themNational Archives, Prologue: The Secret Treaties With California's Indians (Larisa K. Miller, 2013)
  4. The case was decided in favor of the Indians.National Archives, Prologue: The Secret Treaties With California's Indians (Larisa K. Miller, 2013)

Research notes. Prologue gives July 2, 1852 for the Senate's rejection; OSU cites the Senate Executive Journal of July 8, 1852, so only 'in 1852' is stated. The cited sources do not identify the signers' present-day nations. The treaty text gives no acreage.

What the treaty did to the land

About 369,000 acres recognized, kept or set aside for the nations. Each shape is a numbered area in the federal government’s 1899 record of land cessions.

What happened next

Everything the record holds about this land and this treaty, in order: what earlier agreements said, what this one did, and what the United States, the courts and the nations did afterwards.

  1. 1851

    This treaty

    About 369,000 acres set aside as a reservation for the Cah-wia, Choi-nuck and others

    At Camp Belt in 1851, twelve tribes agreed to a King's River district and gave up other land claims; the Senate never ratified it.

  2. 1852

    Promise broken

    California: 18 unratified treaties (1851-52) and the secrecy until 1905

    Eighteen 1851-52 treaties promised California tribes reserved land; the Senate rejected them in secret and kept them sealed until 1905.

  3. 2026

    Related history

    California goal of 7.5 million acres under tribal stewardship

    California's Natural Resources Agency set a goal in March 2026 of at least 7.5 million acres, about 7% of the state, under tribal stewardship.

  4. 2026

    Related history

    Mechoopda regain 450 acres in Big Chico Creek watershed

    The Mechoopda Tribe reportedly took back about 450 acres beside the Big Chico Creek watershed in June 2026, per one local report.

  5. Date unknown

    Related history

    California Tribal Nature-Based Solutions land return program

    California's Tribal Nature-Based Solutions program funds tribal land returns; its 2024 awards supported about 38,950 acres.

Who is doing the work today

The nations connected to this treaty come first, then groups returning land and defending treaty rights. Support goes directly to them.

Who is doing the work

This history belongs to living nations. Start with them:

Working with these nations

Native legal and land defense, nationally

Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.

Sources

Sources

  1. digicoll.lib.berkeley.edu/record/83366/files/arfs003-001.pdfreference work
Research notes

Letter A-R follows Heizer (1972) schedule. U.S. commissioner(s): Barbour. Tribal names as printed in Heizer, in 1850s spellings; present-day nation identification needs tribal consultation. Senate rejected all 18 in secret session 1852-07-08 (Heizer, Mechoopda); Prologue (NARA) article says 1852-07-02. Injunction of secrecy lifted 1905-01-18. Total proposed acreage not stated in Heizer; Mechoopda page says 'more than eight million acres' for all 18 (self-described tribal source).

Shapes are approximate and are not legal descriptions of land, title or jurisdiction.