All treaties and agreements

Treaty

Sioux (Oglala) at Fort Sully, Dakota Territory (1865)

The Oglala Sioux treaty of October 1865 paid $10,000 a year for twenty years to leave overland routes.

Signed
October 28, 1865
Senate
Ratified

What happened

What happened

On October 28, 1865, a United States commission met chiefs and head-men of the Oglala band of Dakota (Sioux) at Fort Sully, Dakota Territory. Commissioners were Governor Newton Edmunds, Edward B. Taylor, Major-General S. R. Curtis, Brigadier-General H. H. Sibley, Henry W. Reed and Orrin Guernsey. It is one of several separate band treaties made there in the fall of 1865.

In Article 1 the band acknowledged itself "subject to the exclusive jurisdiction and authority of the United States." It promised to stop hostilities against United States citizens and to use its influence, and force if necessary, to keep other Sioux bands or neighboring tribes from hostile acts. Later articles had it stop attacks on other tribes unless attacked first, and send quarrels with other tribes to the President.

Article 4 is the exchange. The band would "withdraw from the routes overland" already or later established through its country. In return the United States agreed to pay $10,000 a year for twenty years, in articles chosen by the Secretary of the Interior, as long as the band kept the treaty.

Article 5 protected individuals who chose to settle on band land to farm. When twenty lodges or families had settled to farm and told their agent, each would get $25 a year for five years in implements and improvements. At one hundred families they would be entitled to a farmer and blacksmith at government expense, and to teachers at the Secretary's option. Any Senate amendment, the treaty adds, would bind the band as if the chiefs had agreed to it. It was ratified March 5, 1866, and proclaimed March 17, 1866.

Good to know. This treaty ceded no land. Its header dates it October 28, 1865, but its closing clause says the chiefs signed on October 26.

Summarized with AI assistance from 3 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error

What the sources say, and how this was checked

Well supported by the sources below.

  1. hereby acknowledge themselves to be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction and authority of the United StatesTribal Treaties Database (Oklahoma State University): Sioux (Oglala) at Fort Sully, Dakota Territory (1865)
  2. ten thousand dollars annually for twenty years, in such articles as the Secretary of the Interior may directTribal Treaties Database (Oklahoma State University): Sioux (Oglala) at Fort Sully, Dakota Territory (1865)
  3. shall receive the sum of twenty-five dollars annuallyTribal Treaties Database (Oklahoma State University): Sioux (Oglala) at Fort Sully, Dakota Territory (1865)

Research notes. This account covers the signed terms only; the treaty text does not say what happened afterward, including later treaties. The text shows no cession of land. The treaty is dated October 28, 1865, but its closing clause says the chiefs set their hands 'this twenty-sixth day of October'; the two dates in the document disagree. The text calls the band 'O'Gallala'.

What happened next

Everything the record holds about this land and this treaty, in order: what earlier agreements said, what this one did, and what the United States, the courts and the nations did afterwards.

Who is doing the work today

The nations connected to this treaty come first, then groups returning land and defending treaty rights. Support goes directly to them.

Who is doing the work

This history belongs to living nations. Start with them:

Working with these nations

Native legal and land defense, nationally

Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.

Sources

Sources

  1. treaties.okstate.edu/treaties/treaty-with-the-sioux-oglala-band-1865-0906reference work
    Treaty with the Sioux-Oglala Band, 1865 Oct. 28, 1865. | 14 Stats., 747.

Shapes are approximate and are not legal descriptions of land, title or jurisdiction.