All treaties and agreements

Treaty

Six Nations with Virginia and Maryland at Lancaster, Pennsylvania (1744)

At Lancaster in 1744, Six Nations deputies gave up Maryland claims for 300 pounds and signed a Virginia deed for goods and gold.

Signed
1744-06
Senate
Not recorded
Promises
0 of 1 broken or only partly kept

What happened

What happened

This is a colonial record from 1744, long before the United States existed. The National Archives series includes it because United States treaty-making, in the Archives' words, followed a custom set by Great Britain and the colonial governments.

The council opened on 22 June 1744 in the court house at Lancaster, Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania's lieutenant governor, George Thomas, hosted commissioners from Virginia and Maryland and deputies of the Six Nations (Onondaga, Seneca, Cayuga, Oneida and Tuscarora, as listed). The Six Nations' speaker, Canassatego, said they had conquered the earlier people of the Susquehanna country, so its land now belonged to them. He also said that the lands now in question had never been sold.

Maryland's commissioners said they could not admit the Six Nations' right, but offered 300 pounds in currency, partly in goods, if the Six Nations gave a written release of all claim to Maryland lands. A deed for Maryland's proprietor, Lord Baltimore, was signed by Canassatego and thirteen other leaders, and the rest signed it on 2 July.

Virginia's commissioners offered goods worth 200 pounds and 200 pounds in gold in return for a deed recognizing the King's right to Virginia lands, plus an agreed road. The Six Nations agreed, and asked that their case be put to the King as settlement spread. At Logstown in 1752, Ohio Indian leaders said they had understood the deed's reach differently.

What was promised, and what happened

  • Not known

    Maryland would pay 300 pounds currency for a release of the Six Nations' claim to Maryland lands. (Council)

    a Compensation to the Value of Three Hundred Pounds Currency treaties.okstate.edu

Good to know. The 300 pounds for Maryland is in colonial "Currency"; the Virginia goods are priced in "Pennsylvania Money".

Summarized with AI assistance from 5 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error

What the sources say, and how this was checked

Supported by the sources below; some details rest on one source.

  1. we have conquered them, and their Country now belongs to usTreaty of Lancaster, 1744, Tribal Treaties Database, Oklahoma State University
  2. upon your giving us a Release in Writing of all your Claim to any Lands in MarylandTreaty of Lancaster, 1744, Tribal Treaties Database, Oklahoma State University
  3. These Goods, and Two Hundred Pounds in Gold, which lie on the Table, we will give youTreaty of Lancaster, 1744, Tribal Treaties Database, Oklahoma State University
  4. Upon Condition that you immediately make a Deed recognizing the King's Right to all the LandsTreaty of Lancaster, 1744, Tribal Treaties Database, Oklahoma State University
  5. Negotiation of formal treaties with the Indians by the United States Government followed a custom established by Great Britain and the colonial governments.National Archives, Ratified Indian Treaties, 1722-1869 (microfilm publication M668)

Research notes. The 300-pound Maryland figure is 'Currency' as stated; the Virginia goods are priced in 'Pennsylvania Money'.

What happened next

Everything the record holds about this land and this treaty, in order: what earlier agreements said, what this one did, and what the United States, the courts and the nations did afterwards.

Who is doing the work today

The nations connected to this treaty come first, then groups returning land and defending treaty rights. Support goes directly to them.

Who is doing the work

Working with these nations

Native legal and land defense, nationally

Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.

Sources

Sources

No source is linked to this record yet. That is a gap we are working to close.

Shapes are approximate and are not legal descriptions of land, title or jurisdiction.