All treaties and agreements

Treaty

Five Nations at Albany, New York (1726)

In 1726 at Albany, three Five Nations groups granted the British king their beaver-hunting land and a 60-mile strip, asking his protection.

Signed
September 14, 1726
Senate
Not recorded
Promises
0 of 1 broken or only partly kept

What happened

What happened

This is a colonial record from 1726, long before the United States existed. The National Archives series on ratified Indian treaties includes it because, in the Archives' words, United States treaty-making followed a custom established by Great Britain and the colonial governments.

On 14 September 1726, at Albany, New York, sachems (leaders) of the Seneca, Cayuga and Onondaga signed a deed addressed to King George. The deed says the Five Nations' leaders had given up their beaver-hunting land to the king in 1701, in a meeting with New York's lieutenant governor John Nanfan, asking him to be their protector and defender there. The 1726 deed ratified and confirmed that grant.

It also granted the king a strip of land sixty English miles deep, running inland from the water along Lake Ontario and the Niagara River. The strip began at a creek on the lake the deed calls Oswego. The deed says it took in the Castles (the main towns) of the three nations.

The key term is the trust. Both grants are written as land to be protected and defended by the king, for the use of the three nations and their heirs. The deed was recorded in New York's secretary's office on 9 November 1726. The deed does not record how the British government later used the grant.

What was promised, and what happened

  • Not known

    The king would protect and defend the granted land for the use of the three nations. (Deed)

    to be Protected & Defended by his Said Majesty his heirs & Successors to and for the use of us treaties.okstate.edu

Good to know. The deed is often labeled as made by the Five Nations, but it names only the Seneca, Cayuga and Onondaga.

Summarized with AI assistance from 5 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error

What the sources say, and how this was checked

Supported by the sources below; some details rest on one source.

  1. Give and Render up all their Land where the Beaver Hunting is which they won With the SwordDeed in Trust from Three of the Five Nations of Indians to the King, 1726, Tribal Treaties Database
  2. all that Land Lying and being Sixty miles distance taken Directly from the water into the CountryDeed in Trust from Three of the Five Nations of Indians to the King, 1726, Tribal Treaties Database
  3. thereby Including all the Castles of the aforesaid Three NationsDeed in Trust from Three of the Five Nations of Indians to the King, 1726, Tribal Treaties Database
  4. this fourteenth Day of September in The thirteenth year of his Majestys ReignDeed in Trust from Three of the Five Nations of Indians to the King, 1726, Tribal Treaties Database
  5. Negotiation of formal treaties with the Indians by the United States Government followed a custom established by Great Britain and the colonial governments.National Archives, Ratified Indian Treaties, 1722-1869 (microfilm publication M668)

Research notes. The deed is often labeled as made by the Five Nations at Albany, but the deed names only the Seneca, Cayuga and Onondaga.

What happened next

Everything the record holds about this land and this treaty, in order: what earlier agreements said, what this one did, and what the United States, the courts and the nations did afterwards.

Who is doing the work today

The nations connected to this treaty come first, then groups returning land and defending treaty rights. Support goes directly to them.

Who is doing the work

Working with these nations

Native legal and land defense, nationally

Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.

Sources

Sources

No source is linked to this record yet. That is a gap we are working to close.

Shapes are approximate and are not legal descriptions of land, title or jurisdiction.