Statute

TLA-S-1790

Trade and Intercourse (Nonintercourse) Acts, 1790-1802

Starting in 1790, Congress barred purchases of Indian land without federal approval, the root of the Nonintercourse Act used in later land claims.

Year
1790
Effect on land rights
advanced

What happened

In 1790, at the urging of President Washington and Secretary of War Henry Knox, Congress passed the first Indian Trade and Intercourse Act. The Supreme Court, in Oneida II (1985), describes its core: the Act "prohibited the conveyance of Indian land except where such conveyances were entered pursuant to the treaty power of the United States." The same Act regulated trade. Its first section said no person may carry on trade or intercourse with the Indian tribes without a license from the superintendent or another person the President appoints.

Congress strengthened the rule in 1793. As Oneida II quotes it, the 1793 Act provided that no purchase or grant of lands from any Indians "shall be of any validity in law or equity, unless the same be made by a treaty or convention entered into pursuant to the constitution," in the presence and with the approval of United States commissioners. Unlike the 1790 version, the new statute included criminal penalties. Congress passed further versions in 1796, 1799 and 1802.

The laws mattered long after they were passed. Oneida II involved a 1795 New York purchase of Oneida land that, the tribes alleged, violated the 1793 Act. The Court held the tribes have a federal common-law right of action for violation of their possessory rights, and that the Nonintercourse Acts did not preempt it. In 1980, Congress cited the 1790 Act when it settled the Maine land claims.

Summarized with AI assistance from 5 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error

What the sources say, and how this was checked

Supported by the sources below; some details rest on one source.

  1. person shall be permitted to carry on any trade or intercourse with the IndiansAct of July 22, 1790, ch. 33, 1 Stat. 137, Statutes at Large
  2. The Act prohibited the conveyance of Indian land except where such conveyances were entered pursuant to the treaty power of the United States.Oneida Indian Nation v. County of Oneida (Oneida II), 470 U.S. 226 (1985), Cornell LII
  3. Unlike the 1790 version, the new statute included criminal penalties for violation of its terms.Oneida Indian Nation v. County of Oneida (Oneida II), 470 U.S. 226 (1985), Cornell LII
  4. Respondents have a federal common-law right of action for violation of their possessory rights.Oneida Indian Nation v. County of Oneida (Oneida II), 470 U.S. 226 (1985), Cornell LII
  5. the Trade and Intercourse Act of 1790 (1 Stat. 137)Maine Indian Claims Settlement Act, Pub. L. 96-420, 94 Stat. 1785 (1980)

Research notes. Only the first page of the 1790 Act was available in the Statutes at Large, so the land-conveyance section itself (section 4) was not read; its content comes from the Supreme Court's description in Oneida II. The 1796, 1799 and 1802 acts were not opened. The 1790 Act did not include criminal penalties for land purchases according to Oneida II.

Who is doing the work

Native legal and land defense, nationally

Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.

Connections

Links marked “suggested” were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.

Doctrine applied 3

Policy era 1

Applied by 1

Used to carry out 1

Sources

  1. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonintercourse_Actpointer
The record’s fields
Citation
Act of July 22, 1790, ch. 33, 1 Stat. 137; Acts of Mar. 1, 1793 (ch. 19, 1 Stat. 329), May 19, 1796 (ch. 30, 1 Stat. 469), Mar. 3, 1799 (ch. 46, 1 Stat. 743), Mar. 30, 1802 (ch. 13, 2 Stat. 139)
Kind
Statute
Confidence
High

Correct this record