Statute
Trade and Intercourse Act of 1834
The 1834 Trade and Intercourse Act made any purchase of Indian land invalid unless made by federal treaty, a rule still codified today.
- Citation
- Act of June 30, 1834, ch. 161, 4 Stat. 729 (section 12 at 4 Stat. 730 codified at 25 U.S.C. 177)
- Year
- 1834
- Effect on land rights
- advanced
What happened
On June 30, 1834, Congress passed "An Act to regulate trade and intercourse with the Indian tribes, and to preserve peace on the frontiers." It was the latest in a series of such laws, and it is the version whose land rule survives in the U.S. Code.
Section 1 defined where the law applied. It declared the Indian country to be the part of the United States west of the Mississippi, outside Missouri, Louisiana and the Arkansas Territory, and the part east of the Mississippi not within any state to which the Indian title had not been extinguished. Section 2 barred trade with Indians in the Indian country without a license from a superintendent of Indian affairs or an agent.
Section 12 is the land rule. It said that no purchase, grant, lease "or other conveyance of lands, or of any title or claim thereto, from any Indian nation or tribe of Indians, shall be of any validity in law or equity, unless the same be made by treaty or convention entered into pursuant to the constitution." A private person who tried to negotiate such a purchase without federal authority would forfeit one thousand dollars.
That sentence is now 25 U.S.C. 177. Its wording is nearly the same: "No purchase, grant, lease, or other conveyance of lands, or of any title or claim thereto, from any Indian nation or tribe of Indians, shall be of any validity in law or equity, unless the same be made by treaty or convention entered into pursuant to the Constitution." The statute still sets the penalty for unauthorized negotiators at $1,000.
Summarized with AI assistance from 4 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error
What the sources say, and how this was checked
Well supported by the sources below.
An Act to regulate trade and intercourse with the Indian tribes, and to preserve peace on the frontiers
Act of June 30, 1834, ch. 161, 4 Stat. 729, Statutes at Largeshall be of any validity in law or equity, unless the same be made by treaty or convention entered into pursuant to the constitution.
Act of June 30, 1834, ch. 161, 4 Stat. 729, Statutes at Largebe taken and deemed to be the Indian country.
Act of June 30, 1834, ch. 161, 4 Stat. 729, Statutes at Largeshall be of any validity in law or equity, unless the same be made by treaty or convention entered into pursuant to the Constitution.
25 U.S.C. 177, Purchases or grants of lands from Indians, Cornell LII
Research notes. The 1834 Act's criminal-jurisdiction provisions were not read. The 1834 Act was itself an updated version of earlier acts (see the record for the 1790-1802 Acts). How courts have enforced section 177 (for example in Oneida cases) is covered in separate records. Penalty wording in the current Code was read; any amendments to the dollar figure were not traced.
Who is doing the work
Native legal and land defense, nationally
- Native American Rights Fund (NARF) Native-led Litigation and legal advocacy for tribal sovereignty, treaty rights, land and resources Give on their site Website
- NDN Collective (LANDBACK Campaign) Native-led LANDBACK campaign (launched 2020; Mount Rushmore closure and return of Black Hills public lands), Indigenous… Give on their site Website
- Indian Land Tenure Foundation (ILTF) Native-led Land recovery and control by tribes and individual Indian landowners Website
- Decolonizing Wealth Project (Indigenous Earth Fund; California Tribal Land Return) Native-led Reparative philanthropy Give on their site Website
Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.
Connections
Links marked “suggested” were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.
Doctrine applied 3
Policy era 1
- Removal1830suggested
Used to carry out 1
Sources
- law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/25/177legal text copy
- Kind
- Statute
- Confidence
- High