Statute

National Historic Preservation Act (Section 106; 1992 TCP amendments)

The 1966 Historic Preservation Act makes federal agencies weigh effects on historic places, and since 1992 places of religious and cultural importance to tribes can be covered.

Citation
Pub. L. 89-665, 80 Stat. 915 (1966), 54 U.S.C. 300101 et seq.
Year
1966
Effect on land rights
advanced

What happened

The National Historic Preservation Act became Public Law 89-665 on October 15, 1966. Its purpose, in its own words, was "to establish a program for the preservation of additional historic properties throughout the Nation." Nothing in the original text singled out tribes.

The key rule is section 106. Before approving federal money or issuing a license for an undertaking, a federal agency must "take into account the effect of the undertaking" on historic property, and must give the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation a reasonable chance to comment. In 1966 the covered places were those included in the National Register. The wording is about process. It tells agencies to consider effects; it does not command them to stop a project.

In 1992, Congress amended the Act to add protection for Native places. Today's 54 U.S.C. 302706 says property "of traditional religious and cultural importance to an Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization may be determined to be eligible for inclusion on the National Register." It also says that when carrying out section 106, a federal agency "shall consult with any Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization that attaches religious and cultural significance" to such property.

The result is a consultation duty, not a veto. The Advisory Council describes Section 106 as a review process in which the federal agency consults to assess effects and then explores ways to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects.

Summarized with AI assistance from 5 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error

What the sources say, and how this was checked

Well supported by the sources below.

  1. To establish a program for the preservation of additional historic propertiesNational Historic Preservation Act, Pub. L. 89-665, 80 Stat. 915 (Oct. 15, 1966), Statutes at Large
  2. shall take into account the effect of the undertaking on any historic property.54 U.S.C. 306108 (NHPA section 106), Cornell LII
  3. Property of traditional religious and cultural importance to an Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization may be determined to be eligible54 U.S.C. 302706, Eligibility for inclusion on National Register, Cornell LII
  4. a Federal agency shall consult with any Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization that attaches religious and cultural significance to property54 U.S.C. 302706, Eligibility for inclusion on National Register, Cornell LII
  5. The federal agency consults to assess the effects of the project on historic properties.Introduction to Section 106, Advisory Council on Historic Preservation

Research notes. The 1992 amendment is dated from the source notes to 54 U.S.C. 302706 (Pub. L. 102-575, Oct. 30, 1992). Only the statute and the Advisory Council's description were read; how courts have applied section 106 to tribal places was not examined. 'Does not command them to stop' describes the statutory text, not litigation outcomes.

Who is doing the work

Native legal and land defense, nationally

Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.

Connections

Links marked “suggested” were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.

Doctrine applied 2

Policy era 1

Sources

No source is linked to this record yet. That is a gap we are working to close.

Kind
Statute
Confidence
High

Correct this record