Statute
National Historic Preservation Act (Section 106; 1992 TCP amendments)
The 1966 Historic Preservation Act makes federal agencies weigh effects on historic places, and since 1992 places of religious and cultural importance to tribes can be covered.
- Citation
- Pub. L. 89-665, 80 Stat. 915 (1966), 54 U.S.C. 300101 et seq.
- Year
- 1966
- Effect on land rights
- advanced
What happened
The National Historic Preservation Act became Public Law 89-665 on October 15, 1966. Its purpose, in its own words, was "to establish a program for the preservation of additional historic properties throughout the Nation." Nothing in the original text singled out tribes.
The key rule is section 106. Before approving federal money or issuing a license for an undertaking, a federal agency must "take into account the effect of the undertaking" on historic property, and must give the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation a reasonable chance to comment. In 1966 the covered places were those included in the National Register. The wording is about process. It tells agencies to consider effects; it does not command them to stop a project.
In 1992, Congress amended the Act to add protection for Native places. Today's 54 U.S.C. 302706 says property "of traditional religious and cultural importance to an Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization may be determined to be eligible for inclusion on the National Register." It also says that when carrying out section 106, a federal agency "shall consult with any Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization that attaches religious and cultural significance" to such property.
The result is a consultation duty, not a veto. The Advisory Council describes Section 106 as a review process in which the federal agency consults to assess effects and then explores ways to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects.
Summarized with AI assistance from 5 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error
What the sources say, and how this was checked
Well supported by the sources below.
To establish a program for the preservation of additional historic properties
National Historic Preservation Act, Pub. L. 89-665, 80 Stat. 915 (Oct. 15, 1966), Statutes at Largeshall take into account the effect of the undertaking on any historic property.
54 U.S.C. 306108 (NHPA section 106), Cornell LIIProperty of traditional religious and cultural importance to an Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization may be determined to be eligible
54 U.S.C. 302706, Eligibility for inclusion on National Register, Cornell LIIa Federal agency shall consult with any Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization that attaches religious and cultural significance to property
54 U.S.C. 302706, Eligibility for inclusion on National Register, Cornell LIIThe federal agency consults to assess the effects of the project on historic properties.
Introduction to Section 106, Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
Research notes. The 1992 amendment is dated from the source notes to 54 U.S.C. 302706 (Pub. L. 102-575, Oct. 30, 1992). Only the statute and the Advisory Council's description were read; how courts have applied section 106 to tribal places was not examined. 'Does not command them to stop' describes the statutory text, not litigation outcomes.
Who is doing the work
Native legal and land defense, nationally
- Native American Rights Fund (NARF) Native-led Litigation and legal advocacy for tribal sovereignty, treaty rights, land and resources Give on their site Website
- NDN Collective (LANDBACK Campaign) Native-led LANDBACK campaign (launched 2020; Mount Rushmore closure and return of Black Hills public lands), Indigenous… Give on their site Website
- Indian Land Tenure Foundation (ILTF) Native-led Land recovery and control by tribes and individual Indian landowners Website
- Decolonizing Wealth Project (Indigenous Earth Fund; California Tribal Land Return) Native-led Reparative philanthropy Give on their site Website
Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.
Connections
Links marked “suggested” were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.
Doctrine applied 2
Policy era 1
- Termination1953suggested
Sources
No source is linked to this record yet. That is a gap we are working to close.
- Kind
- Statute
- Confidence
- High