Statute
Indian Reorganization Act (Wheeler-Howard Act)
The 1934 Indian Reorganization Act stopped allotment and let the Interior Secretary buy land to hold in trust for tribes.
- Citation
- Act of June 18, 1934, 48 Stat. 984 (Pub. L. 73-383), 25 U.S.C. 5101 et seq. (section 5 at 25 U.S.C. 5108, formerly 465)
- Year
- 1934
- Effect on land rights
- advanced
What happened
For almost fifty years before 1934, federal law had broken up reservations into individual allotments. The Indian Reorganization Act of June 18, 1934 reversed course in its first section. It said that no land of any Indian reservation "shall be allotted in severalty to any Indian." Section 2 extended existing trust periods, so protected Indian lands stayed protected until Congress said otherwise.
Section 5 gave the Secretary of the Interior a tool that is still used today. The Secretary may, in his discretion, acquire land "within or without existing reservations" for the purpose of providing land for Indians. Title to land acquired this way is taken in the name of the United States in trust for the tribe or individual, and the land is exempt from state and local taxation. Section 16 let any tribe organize for its common welfare and adopt a constitution and bylaws.
The Act did not settle who counts as a tribe. Section 19 defined "Indian" to include members of any "recognized Indian tribe now under Federal jurisdiction." In Carcieri v. Salazar (2009), the Supreme Court held that "now" means 1934. It ruled that the Secretary could not take a 31-acre parcel into trust for the Narragansett Tribe, because the Tribe was not under federal jurisdiction in 1934.
Section 5, now codified at 25 U.S.C. 5108, remains the main authority for fee-to-trust acquisitions. Carcieri sets the limit on who may use it.
Summarized with AI assistance from 5 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error
What the sources say, and how this was checked
Well supported by the sources below.
shall be allotted in severalty to any Indian.
Indian Reorganization Act, 48 Stat. 984 (June 18, 1934), Statutes at Largeare hereby extended and continued until otherwise directed by Congress.
Indian Reorganization Act, 48 Stat. 984 (June 18, 1934), Statutes at Largeshall be taken in the name of the United States in trust for the Indian tribe or individual Indian for which the land is acquired
25 U.S.C. 5108 (IRA section 5), Cornell LIIAny Indian tribe shall have the right to organize for its common welfare, and may adopt an appropriate constitution and bylaws
25 U.S.C. 5123 (IRA section 16), Cornell LIIthe Secretary does not have the authority to take the 31-acre parcel into trust.
Carcieri v. Salazar, 555 U.S. 379 (2009), U.S. Reports
Research notes. Acreage restored under the Act is not stated here because no opened source gave it (the record's 'over two million acres' is unsourced).
Who is doing the work
Native legal and land defense, nationally
- Native American Rights Fund (NARF) Native-led Litigation and legal advocacy for tribal sovereignty, treaty rights, land and resources Give on their site Website
- NDN Collective (LANDBACK Campaign) Native-led LANDBACK campaign (launched 2020; Mount Rushmore closure and return of Black Hills public lands), Indigenous… Give on their site Website
- Indian Land Tenure Foundation (ILTF) Native-led Land recovery and control by tribes and individual Indian landowners Website
- Decolonizing Wealth Project (Indigenous Earth Fund; California Tribal Land Return) Native-led Reparative philanthropy Give on their site Website
Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.
Connections
Links marked “suggested” were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.
Doctrine applied 4
Policy era 1
- Indian New Deal and Reorganization1934suggested
Limited by 1
- Carcieri v. Salazar2009suggested
Sources
- law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/25/5108legal text copy
- Kind
- Statute
- Confidence
- High