Statute

Indian Reorganization Act (Wheeler-Howard Act)

The 1934 Indian Reorganization Act stopped allotment and let the Interior Secretary buy land to hold in trust for tribes.

Citation
Act of June 18, 1934, 48 Stat. 984 (Pub. L. 73-383), 25 U.S.C. 5101 et seq. (section 5 at 25 U.S.C. 5108, formerly 465)
Year
1934
Effect on land rights
advanced

What happened

For almost fifty years before 1934, federal law had broken up reservations into individual allotments. The Indian Reorganization Act of June 18, 1934 reversed course in its first section. It said that no land of any Indian reservation "shall be allotted in severalty to any Indian." Section 2 extended existing trust periods, so protected Indian lands stayed protected until Congress said otherwise.

Section 5 gave the Secretary of the Interior a tool that is still used today. The Secretary may, in his discretion, acquire land "within or without existing reservations" for the purpose of providing land for Indians. Title to land acquired this way is taken in the name of the United States in trust for the tribe or individual, and the land is exempt from state and local taxation. Section 16 let any tribe organize for its common welfare and adopt a constitution and bylaws.

The Act did not settle who counts as a tribe. Section 19 defined "Indian" to include members of any "recognized Indian tribe now under Federal jurisdiction." In Carcieri v. Salazar (2009), the Supreme Court held that "now" means 1934. It ruled that the Secretary could not take a 31-acre parcel into trust for the Narragansett Tribe, because the Tribe was not under federal jurisdiction in 1934.

Section 5, now codified at 25 U.S.C. 5108, remains the main authority for fee-to-trust acquisitions. Carcieri sets the limit on who may use it.

Summarized with AI assistance from 5 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error

What the sources say, and how this was checked

Well supported by the sources below.

  1. shall be allotted in severalty to any Indian.Indian Reorganization Act, 48 Stat. 984 (June 18, 1934), Statutes at Large
  2. are hereby extended and continued until otherwise directed by Congress.Indian Reorganization Act, 48 Stat. 984 (June 18, 1934), Statutes at Large
  3. shall be taken in the name of the United States in trust for the Indian tribe or individual Indian for which the land is acquired25 U.S.C. 5108 (IRA section 5), Cornell LII
  4. Any Indian tribe shall have the right to organize for its common welfare, and may adopt an appropriate constitution and bylaws25 U.S.C. 5123 (IRA section 16), Cornell LII
  5. the Secretary does not have the authority to take the 31-acre parcel into trust.Carcieri v. Salazar, 555 U.S. 379 (2009), U.S. Reports

Research notes. Acreage restored under the Act is not stated here because no opened source gave it (the record's 'over two million acres' is unsourced).

Who is doing the work

Native legal and land defense, nationally

Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.

Connections

Links marked “suggested” were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.

Doctrine applied 4

Policy era 1

Limited by 1

Sources

  1. law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/25/5108legal text copy
Kind
Statute
Confidence
High

Correct this record