Statute
American Indian Religious Freedom Act (AIRFA)
The 1978 American Indian Religious Freedom Act set a policy to protect Native worship and site access; the Supreme Court found no enforceable rights.
- Citation
- Pub. L. 95-341, 92 Stat. 469 (Aug. 11, 1978); 42 U.S.C. 1996
- Year
- 1978
- Effect on land rights
- mixed
What happened
The American Indian Religious Freedom Act is a joint resolution, signed August 11, 1978. Its findings say that Federal laws and policies "often deny American Indians access to sacred sites required in their religions," that laws "at times prohibit the use and possession of sacred objects," and that traditional ceremonies had been "intruded upon, interfered with, and in a few instances banned." It says such laws were designed for purposes such as conservation and "were never intended to relate to Indian religious practices."
Section 1 then declares that "henceforth it shall be the policy of the United States to protect and preserve for American Indians their inherent right of freedom to believe, express, and exercise the traditional religions," including "access to sites, use and possession of sacred objects, and the freedom to worship through ceremonials and traditional rites." Section 2 told the President to have federal agencies evaluate their policies in consultation with native traditional religious leaders and report to Congress.
The Supreme Court read the resolution narrowly in Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Association (1988), a case about a Forest Service road and timber plan on land used for religious rituals. The Court wrote: "Nowhere in the law is there so much as a hint of any intent to create a cause of action"
Congress later added a 1994 amendment on the sacramental use of peyote. It makes use by an Indian for bona fide traditional ceremonial purposes "lawful," and says it "shall not be prohibited by the United States or any State," after the Court's 1990 decision in Employment Division v. Smith.
Summarized with AI assistance from 4 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error
What the sources say, and how this was checked
Well supported by the sources below.
such laws and policies often deny American Indians access to sacred sites required in their religions
American Indian Religious Freedom Act, Pub. L. 95-341, Aug. 11, 1978, 92 Stat. 469, govinfo.govincluding but not limited to access to sites, use and possession of sacred objects
American Indian Religious Freedom Act, Pub. L. 95-341, Aug. 11, 1978, 92 Stat. 469, govinfo.govNowhere in the law is there so much as a hint of any intent to create a cause of action
Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Assn., 485 U.S. 439 (1988), Cornell LIIis lawful, and shall not be prohibited by the United States or any State
42 U.S. Code sec. 1996a, Cornell LII
Research notes. The Lyng description names no site location. Details of how agencies responded to the Section 2 evaluation were not reviewed beyond the Court's remark that a report was completed in 1979. The 1994 amendment is cited from the current U.S. Code text of section 1996a, which does not itself show the public law number.
Who is doing the work
Native legal and land defense, nationally
- Native American Rights Fund (NARF) Native-led Litigation and legal advocacy for tribal sovereignty, treaty rights, land and resources Give on their site Website
- NDN Collective (LANDBACK Campaign) Native-led LANDBACK campaign (launched 2020; Mount Rushmore closure and return of Black Hills public lands), Indigenous… Give on their site Website
- Indian Land Tenure Foundation (ILTF) Native-led Land recovery and control by tribes and individual Indian landowners Website
- Decolonizing Wealth Project (Indigenous Earth Fund; California Tribal Land Return) Native-led Reparative philanthropy Give on their site Website
Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.
Connections
Links marked “suggested” were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.
Doctrine applied 2
Policy era 1
- Self-Determination1970suggested
Limited by 1
- Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Ass'n1988suggested
Sources
- Kind
- Statute
- Confidence
- High