Statute

American Indian Religious Freedom Act (AIRFA)

The 1978 American Indian Religious Freedom Act set a policy to protect Native worship and site access; the Supreme Court found no enforceable rights.

Citation
Pub. L. 95-341, 92 Stat. 469 (Aug. 11, 1978); 42 U.S.C. 1996
Year
1978
Effect on land rights
mixed

What happened

The American Indian Religious Freedom Act is a joint resolution, signed August 11, 1978. Its findings say that Federal laws and policies "often deny American Indians access to sacred sites required in their religions," that laws "at times prohibit the use and possession of sacred objects," and that traditional ceremonies had been "intruded upon, interfered with, and in a few instances banned." It says such laws were designed for purposes such as conservation and "were never intended to relate to Indian religious practices."

Section 1 then declares that "henceforth it shall be the policy of the United States to protect and preserve for American Indians their inherent right of freedom to believe, express, and exercise the traditional religions," including "access to sites, use and possession of sacred objects, and the freedom to worship through ceremonials and traditional rites." Section 2 told the President to have federal agencies evaluate their policies in consultation with native traditional religious leaders and report to Congress.

The Supreme Court read the resolution narrowly in Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Association (1988), a case about a Forest Service road and timber plan on land used for religious rituals. The Court wrote: "Nowhere in the law is there so much as a hint of any intent to create a cause of action"

Congress later added a 1994 amendment on the sacramental use of peyote. It makes use by an Indian for bona fide traditional ceremonial purposes "lawful," and says it "shall not be prohibited by the United States or any State," after the Court's 1990 decision in Employment Division v. Smith.

Summarized with AI assistance from 4 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error

What the sources say, and how this was checked

Well supported by the sources below.

  1. such laws and policies often deny American Indians access to sacred sites required in their religionsAmerican Indian Religious Freedom Act, Pub. L. 95-341, Aug. 11, 1978, 92 Stat. 469, govinfo.gov
  2. including but not limited to access to sites, use and possession of sacred objectsAmerican Indian Religious Freedom Act, Pub. L. 95-341, Aug. 11, 1978, 92 Stat. 469, govinfo.gov
  3. Nowhere in the law is there so much as a hint of any intent to create a cause of actionLyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Assn., 485 U.S. 439 (1988), Cornell LII
  4. is lawful, and shall not be prohibited by the United States or any State42 U.S. Code sec. 1996a, Cornell LII

Research notes. The Lyng description names no site location. Details of how agencies responded to the Section 2 evaluation were not reviewed beyond the Court's remark that a report was completed in 1979. The 1994 amendment is cited from the current U.S. Code text of section 1996a, which does not itself show the public law number.

Who is doing the work

Native legal and land defense, nationally

Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.

Connections

Links marked “suggested” were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.

Doctrine applied 2

Policy era 1

Limited by 1

Sources

  1. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Indian_Religious_Freedom_Actpointer
Kind
Statute
Confidence
High

Correct this record