Court case
Talton v. Mayes
In 1896 the Supreme Court held the Fifth Amendment's grand jury rule did not apply to a Cherokee Nation murder prosecution.
- Citation
- 163 U.S. 376 (1896)
- Court
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Year
- 1896
- Nations
- Cherokee Nation
- Treaty at issue
- none (Cherokee constitution; treaties background)
- Effect on land rights
- mixed
What happened
Talton was convicted of murder in a special Supreme Court of the Cherokee Nation, in Cooweeskoowee District, and sentenced to be hanged on February 28, 1893. He was held in the national jail at Tahlequah, Indian Territory, by the Cherokee Nation's high sheriff.
In February 1893 he filed a petition for habeas corpus in the federal court for the Western District of Arkansas. He argued that his indictment was void because it was returned by a body of five grand jurors. That was too few, he said, under the Constitution and laws of the United States, and under the laws of the Cherokee Nation. He said he was deprived of liberty without due process of law.
On May 18, 1896, the Supreme Court affirmed the denial of relief. Justice White wrote that murder committed by one Cherokee upon another within the Cherokee Nation's jurisdiction is "not an offence against the United States, but an offence against the local laws of the Cherokee nation." The Fifth Amendment "does not apply to local legislation of the Cherokee nation."
The Court explained that "as the powers of local self government enjoyed by the Cherokee nation existed prior to the Constitution, they are not operated upon by the Fifth Amendment." It also said that whether an earlier Cherokee law had been repealed was a question solely for the courts of that nation. Justice Harlan dissented.
Summarized with AI assistance from 3 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error
What the sources say, and how this was checked
Well supported by the sources below.
The Fifth Amendment to the Constitution does not apply to local legislation of the Cherokee nation
Talton v. Mayes, 163 U.S. 376 (1896) (U.S. Reports, Library of Congress)powers of local self government enjoyed by the Cherokee nation existed prior to the Constitution
Talton v. Mayes, 163 U.S. 376 (1896) (U.S. Reports, Library of Congress)The crime of murder committed by one Cherokee Indian upon the person of another within the jurisdiction of the Cherokee nation
Talton v. Mayes, 163 U.S. 376 (1896) (U.S. Reports, Library of Congress)
Research notes. The page also says the case "led indirectly to the Indian Civil Rights Act (1968)"; no opened source says so and it is not asserted here. Talton's own tribal membership is stated in the narrative only through the Court's description of the offense as one Cherokee upon another.
Who is doing the work
This history belongs to living nations. Start with them:
Native legal and land defense, nationally
- Native American Rights Fund (NARF) Native-led Litigation and legal advocacy for tribal sovereignty, treaty rights, land and resources Give on their site Website
- NDN Collective (LANDBACK Campaign) Native-led LANDBACK campaign (launched 2020; Mount Rushmore closure and return of Black Hills public lands), Indigenous… Give on their site Website
- Indian Land Tenure Foundation (ILTF) Native-led Land recovery and control by tribes and individual Indian landowners Website
- Decolonizing Wealth Project (Indigenous Earth Fund; California Tribal Land Return) Native-led Reparative philanthropy Give on their site Website
Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.
Connections
Links marked “suggested” were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.
Doctrine applied 2
Policy era 1
- Allotment and Assimilation1887suggested
Nations named 1
- Cherokeesuggested
Sources
- supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/163/376/legal text copy
The record’s fields
- Holding
- The Fifth Amendment grand-jury requirement does not bind the Cherokee Nation's own laws, because tribal self-government predates the Constitution and is not a delegation of federal power.
- Kind
- Court case
- Confidence
- High