Court case

Talton v. Mayes

In 1896 the Supreme Court held the Fifth Amendment's grand jury rule did not apply to a Cherokee Nation murder prosecution.

Citation
163 U.S. 376 (1896)
Court
U.S. Supreme Court
Year
1896
Nations
Cherokee Nation
Treaty at issue
none (Cherokee constitution; treaties background)
Effect on land rights
mixed

What happened

Talton was convicted of murder in a special Supreme Court of the Cherokee Nation, in Cooweeskoowee District, and sentenced to be hanged on February 28, 1893. He was held in the national jail at Tahlequah, Indian Territory, by the Cherokee Nation's high sheriff.

In February 1893 he filed a petition for habeas corpus in the federal court for the Western District of Arkansas. He argued that his indictment was void because it was returned by a body of five grand jurors. That was too few, he said, under the Constitution and laws of the United States, and under the laws of the Cherokee Nation. He said he was deprived of liberty without due process of law.

On May 18, 1896, the Supreme Court affirmed the denial of relief. Justice White wrote that murder committed by one Cherokee upon another within the Cherokee Nation's jurisdiction is "not an offence against the United States, but an offence against the local laws of the Cherokee nation." The Fifth Amendment "does not apply to local legislation of the Cherokee nation."

The Court explained that "as the powers of local self government enjoyed by the Cherokee nation existed prior to the Constitution, they are not operated upon by the Fifth Amendment." It also said that whether an earlier Cherokee law had been repealed was a question solely for the courts of that nation. Justice Harlan dissented.

Summarized with AI assistance from 3 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error

What the sources say, and how this was checked

Well supported by the sources below.

  1. The Fifth Amendment to the Constitution does not apply to local legislation of the Cherokee nationTalton v. Mayes, 163 U.S. 376 (1896) (U.S. Reports, Library of Congress)
  2. powers of local self government enjoyed by the Cherokee nation existed prior to the ConstitutionTalton v. Mayes, 163 U.S. 376 (1896) (U.S. Reports, Library of Congress)
  3. The crime of murder committed by one Cherokee Indian upon the person of another within the jurisdiction of the Cherokee nationTalton v. Mayes, 163 U.S. 376 (1896) (U.S. Reports, Library of Congress)

Research notes. The page also says the case "led indirectly to the Indian Civil Rights Act (1968)"; no opened source says so and it is not asserted here. Talton's own tribal membership is stated in the narrative only through the Court's description of the offense as one Cherokee upon another.

Who is doing the work

This history belongs to living nations. Start with them:

Native legal and land defense, nationally

Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.

Connections

Links marked “suggested” were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.

Doctrine applied 2

Policy era 1

Nations named 1

Sources

  1. supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/163/376/legal text copy
The record’s fields
Holding
The Fifth Amendment grand-jury requirement does not bind the Cherokee Nation's own laws, because tribal self-government predates the Constitution and is not a delegation of federal power.
Kind
Court case
Confidence
High

Correct this record