Violation

Hawaii (context): overthrow of the Kingdom (1893), annexation (1898) and the 1993 Apology

Not yet reviewed by this nation. What follows comes from public records and research. It does not speak for the nation.

In Hawaii, after the 1893 overthrow, Congress annexed the islands by joint resolution in 1898 when a treaty lacked Senate votes.

Treaty
Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation (1849), 9 Stat. 977 (U.S.-Kingdom of Hawaii); not a treaty with a Native nation within the U.S.
Nations
Kanaka Maoli (Native Hawaiians); Kingdom of Hawaii (sovereign state)
When
1893-1898

What happened

This is context, not a ruling that a U.S. treaty with a Native nation was broken. The Kingdom of Hawaii's government was overthrown on January 17, 1893. A 1993 Congressional resolution (Pub. L. 103-150) "apologizes to Native Hawaiians on behalf of the people of the United States for the overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii on January 17, 1893 with the participation of agents and citizens of the United States."

A treaty of annexation was signed in 1897. That fall, the National Archives says, a Petition Against Annexation "was signed by 21,269 native Hawaiian people," and it was read to the Senate. The treaty fell short of the two-thirds Senate vote. The National Archives says "only 46 senators were willing to vote for annexation" by February 1898. Supporters turned to a joint resolution, which needs only a simple majority in each chamber. The Newlands Resolution had the Republic of Hawaii give up "all rights of sovereignty of whatsoever kind," and the islands were annexed on July 7, 1898.

The 1993 resolution states that "Nothing in this Joint Resolution is intended to serve as a settlement of any claims against the United States." In Hawaii v. Office of Hawaiian Affairs (2009) a unanimous Supreme Court held that it "did not strip Hawaii of its sovereign authority to alienate the lands." The 1993 resolution itself says that "the indigenous Hawaiian people never directly relin- quished their claims to their inherent sovereignty as a people." The atlas does not speak for Native Hawaiians.

Good to know. The Kingdom of Hawaii was a recognized independent state, not a tribal nation.

Summarized with AI assistance from 4 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error

What the sources say, and how this was checked

Well supported by the sources below.

  1. Nothing in this Joint Resolution is intended to serve as a settlement of any claims against the United StatesApology Resolution, Pub. L. 103-150, 107 Stat. 1510 (govinfo)
  2. only 46 senators were willing to vote for annexationJoint Resolution for Annexing the Hawaiian Islands (National Archives)
  3. did not strip Hawaii of its sovereign authority to alienate the landsHawaii v. Office of Hawaiian Affairs (2009) (Cornell LII)
  4. never directly relin- quished their claims to their inherent sovereignty as a peopleApology Resolution, Pub. L. 103-150, 107 Stat. 1510 (govinfo)

Research notes. Handle as annexation context: the Kingdom was a recognized state, not a tribal nation, and the 1849 treaty and the 21,269-signature petition in the input were not verified here and are omitted. House/Senate vote tallies for the 1898 resolution were not confirmed in the sources I read and are omitted. The 1993 apology quote is from the statute; the exact Statutes at Large page was read via text extraction. Some sources date the formal transfer to August 12, 1898; the National Archives gives July 7. Crown and government land acreage is unverified.

Who is doing the work

Working with these nations

Native legal and land defense, nationally

Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.

Connections

These links were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.

Nations named 2

Located in 1

Policy era 1

Concerns the instrument 1

Sources

  1. supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/556/163/legal text copy
  2. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annexation_of_Hawaiipointer
  3. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-9/pdf/STATUTE-9-Pg977.pdfprimary record
  4. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-107/pdf/STATUTE-107-Pg1510.pdfprimary record
The record’s fields
What happened
Hawaii (context): overthrow of the Kingdom (1893), annexation (1898) and the 1993 Apology -- LEGAL CATEGORY NOTE: the Kingdom of Hawaii was an internationally recognized state that signed treaties with the United States, e.g., the Dec. 20, 1849 treaty of friendship, commerce and navigation. The 1993 Apology Resolution (Pub. L. 103-150, Nov. 23, 1993) 'apologizes to Native Hawaiians on behalf of the people of the United States for the overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii on January 17, 1893 with the participation of agents and citizens of the United States.' A treaty of annexation signed in 1897 lacked the two-thirds Senate support; Congress instead annexed Hawaii by joint resolution (the Newlands Resolution, 30 Stat. 750): House 209-91 (June 15, 1898), Senate 42-21 (July 6, 1898), signed July 7, 1898. A 1897 petition against annexation gathered 21,269 signatures, more than half of the roughly 39,000 Native Hawaiians. The Territory was created in 1900. The resolution disclaims: 'Nothing in this Joint Resolution is intended to serve as a settlement of any claims against the United States.'
Land affected
Sovereignty and the Crown/government lands (acreage not verified).
Acreage
not verified
Legal aftermath
Hawaii v. Office of Hawaiian Affairs (Mar. 31, 2009, unanimous, Alito): the Apology Resolution's apology and acknowledgment clauses are non-binding, do not create enforceable rights, and do not strip Hawaii's power to sell or transfer the ceded lands granted to the State at statehood.
Kind
Violation
Confidence
Medium
Nation review
Not yet reviewed by this nation
Notes
  • Context record, not a treaty

Correct this record