Violation

Maine: state treaties violating the Nonintercourse Act and the 1980 settlement

Not yet reviewed by this nation. What follows comes from public records and research. It does not speak for the nation.

Maine tribes said land deals lacked the congressional approval the Nonintercourse Act required; Congress settled the claims in 1980.

Treaty
State of Massachusetts/Maine treaties with the Passamaquoddy, Penobscot and Maliseet (1794-1833)
Nations
Passamaquoddy, Penobscot, Houlton Band of Maliseet
When
1790s-1980
Land affected
Most of the aboriginal territory of the Wabanaki nations in Maine.
Acreage
claim covered about 60% of Maine; settlement funded up to 300,000 acres
Legal aftermath
Settlement 1980 (claims extinguished); the settlement's effect on tribal sovereignty remains contested.not yet checked against a source

What happened

The Passamaquoddy and Penobscot Nations' claim began with a 1794 land treaty with Massachusetts, which then governed Maine. The Christian Science Monitor reports that under the 1790 Indian Nonintercourse Act "all land deals between whites and Indians in the Eastern United States had to be ratified by Congress." The tribes argued that the deals they had made with Massachusetts and Maine were never ratified.

The Monitor says the case began in 1957 when a Passamaquoddy woman found a 1794 land treaty with Massachusetts. In April 1980 it described a proposed out-of-court settlement. Over eight years of negotiations the tribes might have sued for return of 12.5 million acres and $25 billion in trespassing damages, a threat that hung over Maine's property owners. President Carter wrote that the claims had clouded title to some two-thirds of the State.

President Carter signed the Maine Indian Claims Settlement Act in October 1980. The Monitor described the deal the tribes had agreed to as a "$27 million development fund and $54.5 million to buy land from willing private land owners," with 300,000 acres to be returned to the tribes, in exchange for giving up their claim to two-thirds of Maine. The National Library of Medicine timeline records "an out-of-court settlement of $81.5 million in reparation for land taken from tribes." Tribal counsel Thomas Tureen said, "The slate is effectively wiped clean."

Good to know. Whether the 1980 settlement limited tribal sovereignty is contested.

Summarized with AI assistance from 2 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error

What the sources say, and how this was checked

Supported by the sources below; some details rest on one source.

  1. all land deals between whites and Indians in the Eastern United States had to be ratified by Congress'Biggest Indian victory since the Little Big Horn' (Christian Science Monitor, 1980)
  2. an out-of-court settlement of $81.5 million in reparation for land taken from tribesNative Voices timeline: Maine Indian Claims Settlement Act (National Library of Medicine)

Research notes. The Monitor's April 1980 figures describe the proposed settlement; the Native Voices timeline gives $81.5 million for the signed Act and the sources do not reconcile the two. Carter's statement is dated Oct. 11, 1980 on the NLM page. The 1975 Maliseet and Passamaquoddy v. Morton ruling and the text of Pub. L. 96-420 were not opened. Whether the settlement affected tribal sovereignty is contested and not sourced here. The tribes' own accounts were not consulted.

Who is doing the work

This history belongs to living nations. Start with them:

Working with these nations

Native legal and land defense, nationally

Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.

Connections

These links were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.

Nations named 3

Land returns that respond to this 2

Taken to court in 1

Carried out through 1

Located in 1

Policy era 1

Sources

  1. law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/25/177legal text copy
  2. nhpr.org/new-england-news/2026-09-17/11-000-acres-of-ancestral-homeland-returned-to-the-peunclassified
  3. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maine_Indian_Claims_Settlement_Actpointer
  4. pressherald.com/2026/06/22/land-returned-to-mikmaq-nation-will-double-tribes-territory/unclassified
The record’s fields
What happened
Maine: state treaties violating the Nonintercourse Act and the 1980 settlement -- The tribes' claim, litigated beginning in the 1970s, was that their land transfers to Massachusetts and Maine violated the Nonintercourse Act because Congress never approved them. The First Circuit's Passamaquoddy v. Morton (1975) recognized that the Act applied. The claim covered about 60% of Maine (Wikipedia's lead; other sources vary). The Maine Indian Claims Settlement Act (Pub. L. 96-420, signed Oct. 10, 1980) allocated $81.5 million and funds to buy up to 300,000 acres. In 2026 TPL-led and other transfers (e.g., about 11,000 acres to the Penobscot Nation in the first phase of a nearly 30,000-acre project, Sept. 17, 2026; about 3,400 acres to the Mi'kmaq Nation, June 2026) continue the process.
Kind
Violation
Confidence
Medium
Nation review
Not yet reviewed by this nation
Notes
  • Some details are disputed

Correct this record