Violation
Mille Lacs (1999): Minnesota's denial of 1837 hunting, fishing and gathering rights
Not yet reviewed by this nation. What follows comes from public records and research. It does not speak for the nation.
Minnesota said an 1850 order, an 1855 treaty and statehood ended Ojibwe treaty rights to harvest; the Supreme Court disagreed in 1999.
- Treaty
- Treaty with the Chippewa (1837), 7 Stat. 536
- Nations
- Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe (Chippewa)
- When
- 1850-1990s
- Land affected
- (Recovered, not lost) Rights had been denied in practice by state regulation until the ruling.
- Acreage
- n/a
- Legal aftermath
- Rights confirmed. Counterexample of treaty-rights vindication; shows that abrogation requires clear congressional intent.
What happened
Under the 1837 Treaty of St. Peters, several Chippewa bands ceded land in present-day Minnesota and Wisconsin. Article 5 guaranteed "the privilege of hunting, fishing, and gathering the wild rice" on the ceded lands "during the pleasure of the President." In 1850 President Taylor issued an executive order that ordered the Chippewa to leave the ceded territory and revoked those rights. The United States later abandoned removal. An 1855 treaty set aside reservations for the Mille Lacs Band but said nothing about earlier hunting and fishing rights. Minnesota became a state in 1858.
In 1990 the Mille Lacs Band and several members sued Minnesota over its restrictions on exercising those rights. The state argued that the 1850 order, the 1855 treaty and statehood had each ended them. In Minnesota v. Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians (decided March 24, 1999), the Supreme Court held that the Chippewa "retain the usufructuary rights guaranteed to them by the 1837 Treaty."
The Court said a President's order must rest on an Act of Congress or the Constitution, and none authorized the removal order. It found the order could not be split into a valid and invalid part. It held the 1855 treaty did not end the rights, and that statehood alone did not. The vote was 5 to 4. Justice O'Connor wrote for the Court, joined by Justices Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg and Breyer. Chief Justice Rehnquist dissented, joined by Justices Scalia, Kennedy and Thomas, and Justice Thomas also wrote separately. The Court added that it did not mean a President could never revoke the rights in line with the 1837 treaty's terms.
Good to know. This is a case where the treaty rights were upheld, not lost; the dates span the years of dispute.
Summarized with AI assistance from 3 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error
What the sources say, and how this was checked
Well supported by the sources below.
The Chippewa retain the usufructuary rights guaranteed to them by the 1837 Treaty.
Minnesota v. Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians, 526 U.S. 172 (1999), Cornell LIIThe privilege of hunting, fishing, and gathering the wild rice, upon the lands, the rivers and the lakes included in the territory ceded
Treaty with the Chippewa, 1837 (St. Peters), 7 Stat. 536, Tribal Treaties DatabaseTaylor signed an executive order cancelling the land usage rights of the Lake Superior Ojibwe.
Sandy Lake Tragedy, MNopedia (Minnesota Historical Society)
Research notes. Herrera v. Wyoming (2019) was not opened. Date range 1850-1990s is the dispute period; the rights were upheld, not lost.
Who is doing the work
This history belongs to living nations. Start with them:
- Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians of the Bad River Reservation, Wisconsin
- Bay Mills Indian Community
- Chippewa Cree Indians of the Rocky Boy's Reservation, Montana
- Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians, Michigan
- Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin
- Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa
- Lac Vieux Desert Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of Michigan
- Little Shell Tribe of Chippewa Indians of Montana
Working with these nations
- Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife Commission (GLIFWC) Nation government Ojibwe treaty rights in ceded territories, natural resource stewardship, manoomin, and a Land Conservancy program… Give on their site Website
- Honor the Earth Native-led Pipeline resistance, sovereignty, energy justice Give on their site Website
- White Earth Land Recovery Project (WELRP) Native-led Recover the original White Earth reservation land base Give on their site Website
- Native Land Conservancy (Massachusetts) Native-led Native-led land conservation Give on their site Website
Land return and Native-led work nearby
- Dream of Wild Health Native-led Owns a 30-acre farm in Hugo MN Give on their site Website
- Indigenous Environmental Network (IEN) Native-led Environmental and climate justice Give on their site Website
- Native Governance Center Native-led Strengthening Native nation governance and capacity to exercise sovereignty Give on their site Website
- Owamniyomni Okhodayapi (formerly Friends of the Falls) Native-led Dakota-led restoration and return of care for sacred St. Anthony Falls (Owamniyomni) site in Minneapolis, with… Give on their site Website
Native legal and land defense, nationally
- Native American Rights Fund (NARF) Native-led Litigation and legal advocacy for tribal sovereignty, treaty rights, land and resources Give on their site Website
- NDN Collective (LANDBACK Campaign) Native-led LANDBACK campaign (launched 2020; Mount Rushmore closure and return of Black Hills public lands), Indigenous… Give on their site Website
- Indian Land Tenure Foundation (ILTF) Native-led Land recovery and control by tribes and individual Indian landowners Website
- Decolonizing Wealth Project (Indigenous Earth Fund; California Tribal Land Return) Native-led Reparative philanthropy Give on their site Website
Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.
Connections
These links were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.
Taken to court in 2
Nations named 2
Located in 1
Policy era 1
- Removal1830
Concerns the instrument 1
Sources
The record’s fields
- What happened
- Mille Lacs (1999): Minnesota's denial of 1837 hunting, fishing and gathering rights -- The 1837 treaty ceded land but kept the 'privilege of hunting, fishing, and gathering the wild rice' on ceded land 'during the pleasure of the President.' An 1850 executive order attempted to revoke the privilege and order removal; the 1855 treaty ceded more land but did not mention the rights; Minnesota became a state in 1858. Minnesota argued each ended the rights. The Supreme Court (5-4, O'Connor) held the 1850 order ineffective (the removal portion lacked legal authority and was not severable), the 1855 treaty did not abrogate the rights, and statehood did not extinguish them.
- Kind
- Violation
- Confidence
- High
- Nation review
- Not yet reviewed by this nation