All treaties and agreements

CaliforniaNever ratified

California Treaty P: Camp Fernando Feliz, 1851 (unratified)

At Camp Fernando Feliz in 1851, four Russian River peoples agreed to move to Clear Lake; the Senate never ratified it.

Signed
August 22, 1851
Senate
Never ratified
Land given up
about 4.9 million acres
The land in this treaty’s record. Open on the map

The Senate never ratified this treaty, so under U.S. law it never took effect, even when the government acted on it.

What happened

What happened

On August 22, 1851, at Camp Fernando Feliz on the Russian River, Indian agent Redick McKee made a treaty with the Sai-nell, Yu-ki-as, Mas-su-ta-ka-ya and Po-mo tribes. In Article 3 they agreed to "relinquish, cede, and forever quit claim" to the United States all their right, title, claim or interest in lands or soil in California. In Article 4 they agreed that within one year, or when the United States required, they would "remove with their families and property from the lands they now occupy on Russian river" to the Clear Lake reservation named in the Camp Lu-pi-yu-ma treaty.

The United States agreed to defray the cost of the removal, run by the Indian agent. It promised 100 head of beef cattle and 200 sacks of flour in 1851 and for two years after the move. Article 5 provided a physician, paid by the United States, until a military post with a surgeon was set up on the reservation.

None of it took effect. It was one of 18 treaties made in California in 1851 and 1852. The National Archives' Prologue magazine says the senators found the commissioners' appointments irregular, were unsure whether Mexico had recognized native land title, and heard strong objections from white Californians. The Senate "rejected the treaties and, following Senate rules, imposed an injunction of secrecy on them." With the treaties rejected, Indian title was left unresolved. Prologue adds that Indians of California later sought compensation for lands taken without payment in a case before the Indian Claims Commission. It reports that "the case was decided in favor of the Indians."

Good to know. Sources give July 2 or July 8, 1852 as the date the Senate rejected it.

Summarized with AI assistance from 4 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error

What the sources say, and how this was checked

Well supported by the sources below.

  1. they will remove with their families and property from the lands they now occupy on Russian riverTribal Treaties Database (Oklahoma State University): Treaty with the Sai-nell, Yu-ki-as, etc., 1851
  2. relinquish, cede, and forever quit claim to the United StatesTribal Treaties Database (Oklahoma State University): Treaty with the Sai-nell, Yu-ki-as, etc., 1851
  3. the Senate rejected the treaties and, following Senate rules, imposed an injunction of secrecy on themNational Archives, Prologue: The Secret Treaties With California's Indians (Larisa K. Miller, 2013)
  4. The case was decided in favor of the Indians.National Archives, Prologue: The Secret Treaties With California's Indians (Larisa K. Miller, 2013)

Research notes. Prologue gives July 2, 1852 for the Senate's rejection; OSU cites the Senate Executive Journal of July 8, 1852, so only 'in 1852' is stated. The cited sources do not identify the signers' present-day nations. The treaty text gives no acreage.

What the treaty did to the land

About 4.9 million acres given up. Each shape is a numbered area in the federal government’s 1899 record of land cessions.

What happened next

Everything the record holds about this land and this treaty, in order: what earlier agreements said, what this one did, and what the United States, the courts and the nations did afterwards.

  1. 1851

    This treaty

    About 4.9 million acres ceded to the United States by the Mas-su-ta-ka-ya, Po-mo and others

    At Camp Fernando Feliz in 1851, four Russian River peoples agreed to move to Clear Lake; the Senate never ratified it.

  2. 1852

    Promise broken

    California: 18 unratified treaties (1851-52) and the secrecy until 1905

    Eighteen 1851-52 treaties promised California tribes reserved land; the Senate rejected them in secret and kept them sealed until 1905.

  3. 2026

    Related history

    California goal of 7.5 million acres under tribal stewardship

    California's Natural Resources Agency set a goal in March 2026 of at least 7.5 million acres, about 7% of the state, under tribal stewardship.

  4. 2026

    Related history

    Mechoopda regain 450 acres in Big Chico Creek watershed

    The Mechoopda Tribe reportedly took back about 450 acres beside the Big Chico Creek watershed in June 2026, per one local report.

  5. Date unknown

    Related history

    California Tribal Nature-Based Solutions land return program

    California's Tribal Nature-Based Solutions program funds tribal land returns; its 2024 awards supported about 38,950 acres.

Who is doing the work today

The nations connected to this treaty come first, then groups returning land and defending treaty rights. Support goes directly to them.

Who is doing the work

This history belongs to living nations. Start with them:

Working with these nations

Native legal and land defense, nationally

Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.

Sources

Sources

  1. digicoll.lib.berkeley.edu/record/83366/files/arfs003-001.pdfreference work
Research notes

Letter A-R follows Heizer (1972) schedule. U.S. commissioner(s): McKee. Tribal names as printed in Heizer, in 1850s spellings; present-day nation identification needs tribal consultation. Senate rejected all 18 in secret session 1852-07-08 (Heizer, Mechoopda); Prologue (NARA) article says 1852-07-02. Injunction of secrecy lifted 1905-01-18. Total proposed acreage not stated in Heizer; Mechoopda page says 'more than eight million acres' for all 18 (self-described tribal source).

Shapes are approximate and are not legal descriptions of land, title or jurisdiction.