Statute
House Concurrent Resolution 108 (termination policy)
House Concurrent Resolution 108 in 1953 declared Congress's sense that named tribes should be freed from federal supervision at the earliest possible time.
- Citation
- H. Con. Res. 108, 83d Cong., 1st Sess., 67 Stat. B132 (Aug. 1, 1953)
- Year
- 1953
- Effect on land rights
- eroded
What happened
House Concurrent Resolution 108, passed August 1, 1953, is a statement of congressional policy, not a law that ended any tribe by itself. Its preamble says it is the policy of Congress "as rapidly as possible" to make Indians subject to the same laws and entitled to the same privileges and responsibilities as other citizens, "to end their status as wards of the United States," and to grant them the rights of American citizenship.
The operative part declares it "the sense of Congress" that, "at the earliest possible time," all Indian tribes and their members in California, Florida, New York and Texas, and five named tribes, "should be freed from Federal supervision and control." The named tribes were the Flathead of Montana, the Klamath of Oregon, the Menominee of Wisconsin, the Potawatomi of Kansas and Nebraska, and the Turtle Mountain Chippewa members in North Dakota. Bureau of Indian Affairs offices serving freed tribes should be abolished, and the Secretary of the Interior was to report recommended legislation to Congress by January 1, 1954.
The National Archives says the resolution launched what is called termination: it ended federal recognition of affected tribes, federal services, and the trust status of their reservations, often shifting jurisdiction to states. Public Law 280 followed on August 15, 1953. From 1953 to 1970, the Archives says, Congress began 60 termination proceedings and over three million acres of tribal lands were relinquished. The Nixon administration repudiated termination in 1970, but the Archives calls its effect "devastating for many tribes" nonetheless.
Good to know. A concurrent resolution states Congress's view and does not have the force of law; the actual terminations were done by separate statutes.
Summarized with AI assistance from 4 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error
What the sources say, and how this was checked
Well supported by the sources below.
should be freed from Federal supervision and control and from all disabilities and limitations specially applicable to Indians
H. Con. Res. 108, Aug. 1, 1953, 67 Stat. B132 (Statutes at Large), govinfo.govit is the policy of Congress, as rapidly as possible, to make the Indians within the territorial limits
H. Con. Res. 108, Aug. 1, 1953, 67 Stat. B132 (Statutes at Large), govinfo.govFrom 1953 until 1970, Congress initiated 60 separate termination proceedings
Bureau of Indian Affairs Records: Termination, National ArchivesTermination ended federal recognition of affected tribes and the federal aid and services that came with that recognition.
Bureau of Indian Affairs Records: Termination, National Archives
Research notes. A concurrent resolution states Congress's view and does not have the force of law; the actual terminations were done by separate statutes, which were not read here. Which tribes were restored later, and when, was not confirmed from an opened source. The 'about 100+ tribes terminated' figure in the old record is replaced by the National Archives' count of 60 proceedings.
Who is doing the work
Native legal and land defense, nationally
- Native American Rights Fund (NARF) Native-led Litigation and legal advocacy for tribal sovereignty, treaty rights, land and resources Give on their site Website
- NDN Collective (LANDBACK Campaign) Native-led LANDBACK campaign (launched 2020; Mount Rushmore closure and return of Black Hills public lands), Indigenous… Give on their site Website
- Indian Land Tenure Foundation (ILTF) Native-led Land recovery and control by tribes and individual Indian landowners Website
- Decolonizing Wealth Project (Indigenous Earth Fund; California Tribal Land Return) Native-led Reparative philanthropy Give on their site Website
Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.
Connections
Links marked “suggested” were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.
Doctrine applied 2
Policy era 1
- Termination1953suggested
Used to carry out 1
Sources
No source is linked to this record yet. That is a gap we are working to close.
- Kind
- Statute
- Confidence
- High