Statute

Burke Act

The 1906 Burke Act let the Interior Secretary end trust protection of an allotment early if he judged the owner competent.

Citation
Act of May 8, 1906, ch. 2348, 34 Stat. 182 (amending sec. 6 of the Dawes Act)
Year
1906
Effect on land rights
eroded

What happened

The Burke Act, approved May 8, 1906, rewrote Section 6 of the 1887 Dawes Act. That law had made Indians citizens once they received allotments. The Burke Act delayed citizenship for allottees until "the expiration of the trust period" and the conveyance of a fee patent.

The key change is a proviso. The Secretary of the Interior could, whenever he was "satisfied that any Indian allottee is competent and capable of managing his or her affairs," have a patent in fee simple issued. After that, "all restrictions as to sale, incumbrance, or taxation of said land shall be removed." The text does not say the allottee had to ask. Until then, allottees with trust patents stayed under the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States.

Another section covered inheritance. If an allottee died during the trust period, the allotment was cancelled and the Secretary would find the legal heirs and issue them a fee patent, or sell the land and pay the heirs the net proceeds. His findings on heirs were "conclusive and final." The Act did not extend to Indians in the Indian Territory.

The Library of Congress calls the Act the "Forced Fee Patenting Act." The Oklahoma Historical Society's encyclopedia says Congress feared that freed allottees would be cheated of their land, and that many saw the law as an attempt to hasten assimilation. A 1928 report quoted in a Department of the Interior opinion said patents under the Dawes or Burke Acts removed Indians "in part at least" from federal jurisdiction.

Good to know. An Oklahoma encyclopedia describes the timing of the competency decision differently from the statute; this page follows the statute's text.

Summarized with AI assistance from 5 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error

What the sources say, and how this was checked

Well supported by the sources below.

  1. shall be satisfied that any Indian allottee is competent and capable of managing his or her affairsBurke Act, May 8, 1906, 34 Stat. 182 (Statutes at Large), govinfo.gov
  2. all restrictions as to sale, incumbrance, or taxation of said land shall be removedBurke Act, May 8, 1906, 34 Stat. 182 (Statutes at Large), govinfo.gov
  3. or the Forced Fee Patenting ActFrom the Serial Set: Citizenship and Suffrage for Native Americans, Library of Congress
  4. This legislation was also seen by many as an attempt by Congress to hasten the assimilation of American Indians into white culture.Burke Act (1906), Encyclopedia of Oklahoma History and Culture
  5. the effect of removing them in part at least from the jurisdiction of the national governmentSolicitor's Opinion M-37055 (citing the 1928 Meriam Report), Department of the Interior

Research notes. The old record's phrase 'forced fee patents' and its claim of accelerated land loss are not stated in the sources opened here; no acreage lost under the Act was found. The Oklahoma encyclopedia entry says the Secretary decided competency 'before he could even receive an allotment', which differs from the statute text; the statute text was followed. The Solicitor's opinion quotes the 1928 Meriam Report secondhand.

Who is doing the work

Native legal and land defense, nationally

Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.

Connections

Links marked “suggested” were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.

Doctrine applied 2

Policy era 1

Sources

  1. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burke_Actpointer
Kind
Statute
Confidence
High

Correct this record