Land return

Fort Reno return campaign (Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes)

Not yet reviewed by this nation. What follows comes from public records and research. It does not speak for the nation.

The Cheyenne-Arapaho Tribes say Fort Reno should have reverted to them; Congress has barred its transfer, and a 2026 draft would make that permanent.

Nation
Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes
Where
West of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Acres
6,700
Began
1948
Status
Blocked

Where the land is

Fort Reno, Canadian County, Oklahoma. Location approximate.

This land is inside Land of the Arapaho and Cheyenne in Oklahoma, ceded 1891 (area 525). It also lies inside Reservation of the Comanche and Kiowa in Colorado, Kansas and Texas (area 478), land the 1899 record shows the nation kept.

about 6700 acres soughtabout 4.4 million acres ceded in 1891

Location from en.wikipedia.org.

What happened

Fort Reno, west of Oklahoma City, is the center of a long campaign by the Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes. In a 2012 submission to a federal trust commission, the Tribes' governor said the United States carved 9,600 acres out of their reservation in 1883 for Fort Reno "for military purposes exclusively," with the understanding that it would be returned to the Tribes at the end of military use. The submission says an Interior Department Solicitor's opinion found the fort was not included in the Tribes' 1890 cession.

The same document sets out what happened next. In 1937, one thousand acres went to the Bureau of Prisons. In 1948 the balance was transferred to the Department of Agriculture without a hearing. In 1965 the Tribes settled a claim before the Indian Claims Commission for $15 million, but Fort Reno was not included, because the commission could not consider claims that arose after August 13, 1946. In 1999 an Interior opinion said the Tribes had a credible and equitable claim, but for the statute of limitations. The Tribes lost a quiet title suit in 2009.

According to Tribal Business News, a new House draft of the 2026 farm bill, advanced by the Agriculture Committee 34 to 17, would remove the expiration date on a prohibition on transferring the 9,500-acre property. It says the restriction has appeared in farm bills since 2002. Gov. Reggie Wassana wrote that returning the land would "acknowledge and remedy that dispossession." Rep. Frank Lucas argues the claims were resolved by earlier settlements.

Good to know. Sources give different acreages: about 6,700, 9,500, or 9,600 acres set aside in 1883. The farm bill draft status is as of March 2026.

Summarized with AI assistance from 4 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error

What the sources say, and how this was checked

Supported by the sources below; some details rest on one source.

  1. In 1883, the United States carved 9,600 acres out of this reservation to create Fort RenoCheyenne and Arapaho Tribes of Oklahoma: Return of the Fort Reno Lands (submission to DOI Trust Commission, 2012)
  2. in 1948 without hearing or report the balance of Fort Reno was transferred to the Department of Agriculture’s, Agriculture Research ServiceCheyenne and Arapaho Tribes of Oklahoma: Return of the Fort Reno Lands (submission to DOI Trust Commission, 2012)
  3. would remove the expiration date on a prohibition blocking the U.S. Department of Agriculture from transferring the 9,500‑acre Fort Reno propertyFarm bill draft would block return of Fort Reno to Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes (Tribal Business News, Mar. 22, 2026)
  4. acknowledge and remedy that dispossessionFarm bill draft would block return of Fort Reno to Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes (Tribal Business News, Mar. 22, 2026)

Research notes. Acreage differs by source: the atlas shows about 6,700 acres (a USDA research-station figure not found in the pages opened); Tribal Business News says 9,500 acres; the Tribes' 2012 submission says 9,600 acres were set aside in 1883 and about 8,500 acres went to USDA in 1948, with 1,500 later moved to the Bureau of Prisons. The Tribes' 2012 document is advocacy by the Tribes, quoted as their account; the Interior opinion it cites was not opened. A bill number (H.R. 7567) from the seed was not confirmed. The farm bill draft status is as of March 2026 only.

Who is doing the work

Working with these nations

Native legal and land defense, nationally

Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.

Connections

Links marked “suggested” were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.

Nations named 1

Located in 1

Policy era 1

Responds to 1

Supported by 1

Sources

  1. nondoc.com/2026/03/20/farm-bill-draft-would-permanently-block-return-of-fort-reno-to-cheyeunclassified
Kind
Land return
Confidence
High
Nation review
Not yet reviewed by this nation

Correct this record