Nation

Wat-sa-he-wa

Wat-sa-he-wa

Not yet reviewed by this nation. What follows comes from public records and research. It does not speak for the nation.

Region
California

In the record

The United States made one treaty or agreement that names Wat-sa-he-wa as a party: California Treaty R: Camp in Scott's Valley, 1851 (unratified).

The records group it with Shasta.

Written from the records linked here; open any of them for its sources. This is what the United States’ treaty record says, not the nation’s own account.

Names

Each name shows where it comes from. A nation’s own name is shown as the nation writes it.

Names in treaties and records

Who is doing the work

This history belongs to living nations. Start with them:

Native legal and land defense, nationally

Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.

Connections

Links marked “suggested” were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.

Part of 1

Party to 1

Sources

  1. digitalassets.lib.berkeley.edu/anthpubs/ucb/proof/pdfs/arf009-007.pdfreference work
    Merriam (ms.) records that the village is referred to as Watsa-he'-wah, a group in Scott Valley, by a treaty of 1833.
Research notes

Named in an unratified California treaty of 1851-52. People: Shasta (Wats-ah-he'-wah village, Scott River). Heizer & Hester 1970, Shasta Villages no. 89 (the "1833" is as printed; the treaty is the 1851 Scott's Valley treaty). Candidate present-day communities (not verified this session; qvir.com returned HTTP 403): Quartz Valley Indian Community (Shasta and Karuk descent); Shasta descendants also at Siletz and Grand Ronde (Oregon) and in the non-federally-recognized Shasta Nation. OSU lists the Klamath Tribes (Oregon) as successor, which appears mistaken.

Kind
Nation
Confidence
High
Nation review
Not yet reviewed by this nation

Correct this record