Nation

Tat-nah

Tat-nah

Not yet reviewed by this nation. What follows comes from public records and research. It does not speak for the nation.

Region
California

In the record

The United States made one treaty or agreement that names Tat-nah as a party: California Treaty I: Camp Colus, Sacramento River, 1851 (unratified).

The records group it with Patwin. Today, Cachil DeHe Band of Wintun Indians of the Colusa Indian Community of the Colusa Rancheria, California carries this history, as their own pages or research records say.

Written from the records linked here; open any of them for its sources. This is what the United States’ treaty record says, not the nation’s own account.

Names

Each name shows where it comes from. A nation’s own name is shown as the nation writes it.

Names in treaties and records

Who is doing the work

This history belongs to living nations. Start with them:

Native legal and land defense, nationally

Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.

Connections

Links marked “suggested” were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.

Part of 1

Party to 1

Present-day governments that carry this history 1

Sources

  1. digitalassets.lib.berkeley.edu/anthpubs/ucb/proof/pdfs/arf009-006.pdfreference work
    Tat'-nah. Patwin. W. side of Sacramento River, about 2.5 mi. N. of Colusa
Research notes

Named in an unratified California treaty of 1851-52. People: Patwin (Tat'-nah village above Colusa). Present-day link by location (medium).

Kind
Nation
Confidence
High
Nation review
Not yet reviewed by this nation

Correct this record