Doctrine

citizenship

Elk v. Wilkins (1884) held the Fourteenth Amendment did not make Native people citizens at birth; Congress declared all remaining non-citizen Indians citizens in 1924.

Definition
U.S. citizenship of Native people (Elk v. Wilkins; 1924 Act).

What happened

The Fourteenth Amendment makes citizens of persons "born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof." In Elk v. Wilkins (1884), the Supreme Court held that did not reach John Elk, who had left his tribe and lived in Omaha, Nebraska. The Court wrote that Indians born within the United States, "members of, and owing immediate allegiance to, one of the Indian tribes," were "no more 'born in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof'" than the children of subjects of a foreign government born within that government's domain. Elk was refused the right to register to vote.

Congress changed the rule by statute. The Act of June 2, 1924 provided that "all non-citizen Indians born within the territorial limits of the United States be, and they are hereby, declared to be citizens of the United States." A proviso added that citizenship would not impair or affect the right of any Indian to tribal or other property.

The rule is now in the Immigration and Nationality Act. Today's 8 U.S.C. 1401(b) lists, among those who are citizens at birth, a person born in the United States to a member of an Indian, Eskimo, Aleutian, or other aboriginal tribe, with the same protection for tribal property.

American Indian citizenship is therefore separate from tribal citizenship, which each nation decides for itself. Nothing in the sources here describes how states responded to the 1924 Act.

Summarized with AI assistance from 4 sources and checked against their words; not yet reviewed by historians or by the nations. Report an error

What the sources say, and how this was checked

Supported by the sources below; some details rest on one source.

  1. members of, and owing immediate allegiance to, one of the Indiana tribesElk v. Wilkins, 112 U.S. 94 (1884), Cornell LII
  2. be, and they are hereby, declared to be citizens of the UnitedAct of June 2, 1924 (Indian Citizenship Act), 43 Stat. 253, Statutes at Large
  3. That the granting of such citizenship shall notAct of June 2, 1924 (Indian Citizenship Act), 43 Stat. 253, Statutes at Large
  4. a person born in the United States to a member of an Indian, Eskimo, Aleutian, or other aboriginal tribe8 U.S.C. 1401, Nationals and citizens of United States at birth, Cornell LII

Research notes. The opinion text is quoted as the Court wrote it (the OCR text reads 'Indiana tribes', a typographical error in the source page; the narrative uses 'Indian tribes'). The detail that Elk lived in Omaha and was refused registration is from the Court's statement of the case, which was only skimmed. States' continued voting bars after 1924 were not examined.

Who is doing the work

Native legal and land defense, nationally

Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.

Connections

Applied in 3

Sources

No source is linked to this record yet. That is a gap we are working to close.

Kind
Doctrine
Confidence
Medium

Correct this record