Land area

Reservation of the Nir-muck, Nome Cult and others in California (area 331)

Shape traced from the 1899 maps; approximate. Open on the map
  1. 1854

    Set aside as a reservation

    The 1899 record: “Superintendent Henley establishes a reserve called Nome Lackee”

In the record

Set aside in 1854 by Superintendent Henley, not by treaty, as the Nome Lackee reserve for the Nome Lackee, Nome Cult and Nir-muck; not a cession, and later abandoned. The area covers about 47 thousand acres in what is now California.

This area was not ceded. The 1899 record shows it as a reservation the nation kept, at least until the record ends in 1894.

Written from the records linked here; open any of them for its sources.

See this cession on the map

Shapes come from C. C. Royce’s 1899 maps as georeferenced by the US Forest Service. They are approximate and are not legal descriptions of land. Royce recorded land the United States treated as ceded; the shape does not show a nation’s territory.

Who is doing the work

Working with these nations

Land return and Native-led work nearby

Native legal and land defense, nationally

Gifts go straight to each organization; this atlas takes nothing. Listing is not endorsement: how organizations are listed.

Connections

Links marked “suggested” were matched automatically by name or date and have not yet been reviewed by a person.

Nations named for this land 2, matched by the Forest Service, under review

Located in 1

Sources

  1. Royce, Indian Land Cessions (1899), Schedule entry dated 1854-09-01primary record
  2. Royce’s map sheet: California 2 (Library of Congress)primary record
  3. USDA Forest Service, Tribal Lands Ceded to the United States (digitized Royce maps)reference work
The record’s fields
Area number in the 1899 record
331
Dates in the 1899 record
1854-09-01
Peoples as named in the 1899 record
Nir-muck; Nome Cult; Nome Lackee
States
CA
Counties
Tehama
Map sheets in the 1899 record
California 2
Geometry
Approximate shape from Royce’s 1899 maps
Research notes

geometry_role is 'cession' for every USFS feature: no field in the source distinguishes cessions from reservations.

Kind
Land area
Confidence
Medium

Correct this record